similar to: kernel: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() ...

Hi all (and developers in particular) I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the subject, and ends with: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the

I had the following spat out by syslog on my (2.4.18-pre7-ac3) mailer / web server: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" One of its partitions froze hard--I've rebooted it, and I have an oops which the BUG() triggered which won't decode at the moment, but I'll sort that one out

Hello All, I am running Redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7-10 on a Dual CPU, 2 GB RAM machine. I am running Sendmail , Cyrus IMAP and Ldap on the machine After few hours I get the following error in the syslog error file Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:606: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" May 26 17:29:37 netserv kernel: kernel

I got this.. The system was usuable, but not very. If I tried to access the ext3 volume, it would hang. Reboot hung too, complaining about too many open files. Any ideas? I have no idea what triggered it; this is a big file/web/mail server, with all of that on the ext3 volume. And I've never run ksymoops before, but I think I did it right. - Josh Assertion failure in

Hello, Over the last month or so, I've noticed the following error showing up repeatedly in my system logs under kernel 2.4.18-ac3 and more recently under 2.4.19-rc1: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,3)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 I've now been able to capture the following Oops before the system went down entirely: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611:

Hi, By running some scripts on our target system for a while, I lost all means of access to the system. It seems that the kernel is crashed with the following error message: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:731: "(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0)" Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 We are currently running Linux version

All, I know that there is no official port to Kernel 2.4.4, thus I may not get any help, however I am hoping someone could point me in the right direction for my problem. I am currently forced to use kernel 2.4.4 for reasons out of my control (embedded board). Here are the exact versions of everything I'm running: ExT3 Version: ext3-2.4-0.9.6-248 Util Version: util-linux-2.11f.tar.bz2 e2fs

Hi, I use ext3 over RAID1+0 LUN. When I disconnect my fiber cable to the RAID (in order to force a migration to a failover node) I expect to see I/O errors and then a failure to write/read to the filesystem, but in addition I get an Assertion failure. The end result is of course an unusable system which needs to be rebooted. (I reboot the system via machine_restart which works okay but I guess

We have DELL 2650 with CENTOS 3.4 installed. Today I saw following messages on /var/log/messages. Anyone know what it mean? Does it point to which disk? =================================== Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel: EXT3-fs unexpected failure: (((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0); Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel: Possible IO failure. Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel:

Hi All, I m a novice developer of Linux applications. Recently I faced a file system corruption. (I guess) I have a Kernel 2.4.7-10 with ext3 file system in compact flash. The system was up for 3 months and was running with average load conditions. One fine day, it just started sending kernel messages on the serial console. The message was like this. EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)):

I guess this could be filed under the 'shot myself in the foot' section, but I figured I'd report it anyways.. Kernel 2.5.50-bk6, x86, preempt, PIIX IDE, ext3 fs. I dd'ed the first part of a ext3 partition to tmp, then mounted it via loopback. (the image passed a fsck, except for warning about corrupt part. table or superblock) I tried to 'cd' into a directory within

This patch fixes an inefficiency and potential system lockup in the 2.4 kernel's ext3 filesystem. The problem has been present since 2.4.20-pre5. This patch is applicable to 2.4.20. A copy is at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.4/2.4.20/ext3-scheduling-storm.patch Anyone who is using tasks which have realtime scheduling policy on ext3 systems should apply this change.

I've been running into a kernel panic pretty consistently when using data=journal. This occurs during heavy IO, and is highly reproducible (only takes about 5 minutes of IO to cause it). The applications being used are MySQL, Postfix, and a mail filtering application which operates on postfix queue files using mmaped IO. Shortly before the crash, the following messages are logged: Mar

Hi, I just had my server cry this out to the console: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:658: "jh->b_transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction" kernel BUG at transaction.c:658! invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c015e1f6>] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010286 eax: 0000007d ebx: c2ff4200 ecx: c243e000 edx: c068af00 esi: c0d6d900

Hi, I'm running stock kernel 2.4.18, and was downloading some things when I filled up one of my partitions. This was sent to all attached terminals: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:708: "handle->h_buffer_credits > 0" I think: invalid operand: 0000 may have followed. Anyway, it also gave a stack trace and register dump (to syslog), which I've

Hi, as I mentioned in earlier mail to ext3-users I have been getting some corruption on an ext3 filesystem that has been serving NFS. I am now confident that I fully understand the problem and have a patch. It only affects data=journal mode and I wonder if it might also be the cause of the corruption noted by a number of people on linux-kernel. First I will explain the problem. Then display

Hello ext3-users-request, request ======= 2004-03-03 12:00:00 You writed======= >Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to > ext3-users at redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ext3-users-request at redhat.com >

I get 2 rejects applying 2.2.19-ext3 to latest errata rh 2.2.19 kernel. 1) fs/buffer.c Should I put "J_ASSERT(buf->b_count > 0);" before or after " *(int *)0 = 0;"? ===== ext3 0.0.7a patch --- 934,946 ---- if (buf->b_count) { buf->b_count--; + if (!buf->b_count && + (buf->b_jlist != BJ_None && buf->b_jlist

Hello, I am not subscribed to this mailing list. My apologies if non-members are not allowed to post in this forum. I have a Linux-2.4.19pre10aa4 computer and I have seen an error message "Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:598 (03:05 blocknr 0)" appears in the log. With a little bit of research I found that this message is printed from fs/jbd/journal.c,

I'm using redhat 7.2 without kernel upgrade and encountered following error. Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611: blah blah In this mailing list, I found out this is a kernel bug. ;( Which kernel can I use safely? in 2.4.9-31 from redhat, is it fixed? -- Chung Ha-nyung <alita@[kldp.org|neowiz.com> NeoWiz <http://www.neowiz.com> SayClub