similar to: Windows 2000 Printers: "Access Denied, Unable to Connect"

I am attempting to get printing services for Windows 2000 clients working with Samba on a Red Hat 7.2 box. The problem is I can not cancel print jobs (either from a PC or the local smb client). File sharing, and printing other than this problem, work fine. Here is a listing of configuration and system info: 1) the samba packages installed, 2) output of "uname -a", 3) the

I have configured Samba on both a RH Linux 7.2 box and Solaris 8 box and am not able to remove print jobs. The lprm command is not getting called. I know that for a fact because I changed lprm command to equal a script which will log when it is called. And that script is never called. There are no errors in any log files - system or samba. The printing parts of the smb.conf file are:

To Samba Users Group: I posted the message below, and a member of the group called me and talked me through the problem. The solution is at the bottom of the page. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Neilson > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:40 PM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Samba and Windows 2000 Password Authentication > > Is there a

Good question. AFAIK, the IR-printer doesn’t understand the semantics of parameter attributes. In this case, it only knows that there is an attribute on the parameter that is integer valued (with value 1) and that has the name “align”, so it prints it out. If we don’t want it printing out ‘align 1’ then it’s up to us to not set the alignment parameter attribute to a value if that value would be 1.

Yes, all that is correct. My question is more a long term question: why do the .ll printer specify the alignment if it is equivalent to the default one? That is, it seems the sed script expect the printer to not specify it (this would match the load/store behavior), but the ll-printer does specify it, which either means the printer is not ideal on this case and I should fix it, or in this case

Hi Sanjoy, Responses inlined… > On May 8, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > [+CC Mehdi, Vedant for the auto upgrade issue] > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> **Method** >> >> Clearly we are going to have to teach

Is there a way to configure Samba so that all password authentication is done through the Windows domain controllers? As I understand it, the variable "encrypt passwords" must be set to yes if "security" is set to "domain". This causes Samba to reference the smbpasswd file, so if the W2K user's password on the domain controller is not the same as that in the

Reverted: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314922 On Oct 4, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: + Rui, the patch author Do we know what the oldest glibc which works with this patch is? For context, the most recent REHL 5 ships with glibc 2.5. REHL 6 ships with 2.12 and REHL ships with 2.17. I have evidence

Hi Sanjoy, Response/thoughts below... On Aug 19, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com<mailto:sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>> wrote: Hi Daniel, On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Cons: One more attribute to check when implementing a pass that

On Jan 18, 2018, at 10:48 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org<mailto:clattner at nondot.org>> wrote: On Jan 18, 2018, at 7:45 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi all, This change has been reviewed, and appears to be ready to land (review available here if anyone still wants to chime in:

> On Jan 18, 2018, at 7:45 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > This change has been reviewed, and appears to be ready to land (review available here if anyone still wants to chime in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41675 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D41675> ). The process that we’re going to use for landing this will take a few

Hi Alexandre, Before the change you would have been expecting one of the following, correct? a) call void @llvm.memcpy.p3i8.p1i8.i64(i8 addrspace(3)* bitcast ([512 x float] addrspace(3)* [[SPM0]] to i8 addrspace(3)*), i8 addrspace(1)* [[APTR]], i64 2048, i32 0, i1 false) b) call void @llvm.memcpy.p3i8.p1i8.i64(i8 addrspace(3)* bitcast ([512 x float] addrspace(3)* [[SPM0]] to i8 addrspace(3)*), i8

Thanks, that worked like a charm except for the following: llvm generate: call void @llvm.memcpy.p3i8.p1i8.i64(i8 addrspace(3)* align 1 bitcast ([512 x float] addrspace(3)* @a_scratchpad to i8 addrspace(3)*), i8 addrspace(1)* align 1 %0, i64 2048, i1 false) And we expected: call void @llvm.memcpy.p3i8.p1i8.i64(i8 addrspace(3)* bitcast ([512 x float] addrspace(3)* [[SPM0]] to i8

Consider the following IR example: define void @simple([4 x double] *%ptr, i64 %idx) { %stack = alloca [4 x double] %ptri8 = bitcast [4 x double] *%ptr to i8* %stacki8 = bitcast [4 x double] *%stack to i8* call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8 *%stacki8, i8 *%ptri8, i32 32, i32 0, i1 0) %dataptr = getelementptr inbounds [4 x double], [4 x double] *%ptr, i32 0, i64 %idx

Hi Alexandre, The script uses extended-sed syntax, so you need to run sed with the -E option. For example, when preparing the patch I created a file ( script.sed ) containing all of the lines that I copied into the commit message. Then, I ran this bash one-liner from the test directory: for f in $(find . -name '*.ll'); do sed -E -i ‘.sedbak' -f script.sed $f; done When I was happy

Hello, Is there a script to update those test cases? I see mention of a sed script in the commit message but when I try it (see attached) on sed I get the following error: sed: file script line 2: invalid reference \3 on `s' command's RHS Did I lose something in a copy-paste? Is it not really a sed script? How do I run it? On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Daniel Neilson via

Good day all, I’ve spent a few days resurrecting the circa-2015 work on removing the explicit alignment argument (4th arg) from the @llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset intrinsics in favour of using the alignment attribute on the pointer args of calls to the intrinsic. This work was first proposed back in August 2015 by Lang Hames: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089384.html (item

Hello list, I''m developing an application that needs to number the TC rule (and keep it in a internal array table) to be possibly deleted later if its needed. I didn''t find a easy way to do that and will be thankful if somebody can help me. Sorry if the question has a simple answer ... I''m a beginner in TC ... :-) Happy 2004 ...

> To Samba Users Group: > > I posted the message below, and a member of the group called me and talked > me through the problem. The solution is at the bottom of the page. > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Neilson > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:40 PM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Samba and Windows 2000 Password

Hi all, A quick note just to let people know that as of this past Friday my go at this work has been fully landed. It ended up being a back-burner item, so it took longer than I would have liked to get completed. None the less, the changes made were: 1) The IRBuilders in LLVM, Clang, and Polly were all updated to create only the new form of the memory intrinsics. 2) All LLVM passes to understand