similar to: Very large (~1.12 TB) filesystems and wasted space.

Also, it's important to note that 'du -h' reports the appropriate amount of space used and that the drive appears, in all other regards, to be properly using the space. Is this perhaps a bug with how Windows reads the available space left on SMB shares? (Likely a Windows problem) -Tal

>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM Walter H. <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: >> > >> > On 15.02.2019 06:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data? >> > whats your budget? >> > >> > and 50 TB = 50

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:55 PM Phoenix, Merka <merka.phoenix at hpe.com> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM Walter H. <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > >> > > >> > On 15.02.2019 06:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > Could you recommend affordable

So I'm playing around with S3 and elasticdrive, and I create a filesystem on it with a block size larger then 4k. mkfs.xfs -b size=8k /mnt/ed5/ed0 -f This completes fine and sets up the proper filesystem. When I try to mount it, however, I get: mount /mnt/ed5/ed0 /mnt/eds35/ -o loop mount: Function not implemented looking at dmesg I get: XFS: Attempted to mount file system with

When we are blocked waiting for POLLOUT during a request, and happen to receive notice of POLLIN instead, we know that the work done in response to POLLIN will be non-blocking (it returns to %.READY as soon as it would block, which in turn jumps right back into ISSUE_COMMAND because we have a pending request not fully sent yet). Since the jaunt through REPLY was non-blocking, it is unlikely that

I hear momentary audio drop-outs (silences) in some flacs I have encoded. These occur at the same time as "wasted bits" messages in my mplayer output. [flac @ 0x860fb00]coding type: constant [flac @ 0x860fb00]1 wasted bits [flac @ 0x860fb00]coding type: constant [flac @ 0x860fb00]6 wasted bits Is there a way to prevent these at encode-time? If this is not the appropriate list for

I'm guessing here, but it seems that some encoders might only be able to process samples in 4-bit or 8-bit groups, maybe even 16-bit multiples, so this flag would allow the decoder to remove any padding that might have been necessary on the encoder side. For example, if someone were to encode 12-bit samples, but the encoder was forced to use 16-bit registers for calculations, then

2010/4/27 Brian Willoughby <brianw at sounds.wa.com> > i.e. I wouldn't be surprised if there are no FLAC files with this flag > set. > If you look for lossyWAV you'll find that it is actually being used -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20100427/12821b2a/attachment.htm

On 6/25/19 4:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:11:52PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >> When we are blocked waiting for POLLOUT during a request, and happen >> to receive notice of POLLIN instead, we know that the work done in >> response to POLLIN will be non-blocking (it returns to %.READY as soon >> as it would block, which in turn jumps right

Hello everybody. I'm trying to create a local group with this command and I get this error: net sam createlocalgroup peocio [2007/06/28 11:03:16, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:pdb_new_rid(1066) Trying to allocate a RID when algorithmic RIDs are active [2007/06/28 11:03:16, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:pdb_default_create_alias(468) Could not allocate a RID -- wasted a gid :-( Am I missing anything?

Hello all, I'm trying to get CAPI to work with two B channels (AVM B1 PCMCIA) on a P4 2GHz (linux kernel 2.4.21) system. All are ok with just one B channel. But when I open a second B chan, the sound is choppy, with too long gaps, and the CPU load is too high (~50%). On the Asterisk's console I get these messages: -- Executing Dial("H323:4478",

Hi, I am using libvorbis-1.0.1 and I am trying to debug the example decoder (examples/decoder_example.c) using gdb. I have compiled the source tree for debug and can single step through the program. However i am facing the following problem (which I think is more of C than vorbis) 1. after single steppig I finally arrive at the function shown below (in file lib/info.c) static int

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:11:52PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > When we are blocked waiting for POLLOUT during a request, and happen > to receive notice of POLLIN instead, we know that the work done in > response to POLLIN will be non-blocking (it returns to %.READY as soon > as it would block, which in turn jumps right back into ISSUE_COMMAND > because we have a pending request not

Hi again Timo, As agreed earlier tonight, you'll find as attachments 4 diffs (diff -u) implementing the new workaround "tb-lsub-flags". The 4 impacted files are: ./src/imap/imap-settings.h ./src/imap/imap-settings.c ./src/imap/cmd-list.c ./src/config/all-settings.c Here is the proposed description for the dovecot.conf file: # tb-lsub-flags: # Usually IMAP servers don't

Hi, I notice in the Changelog that the tb-negative-fetch workaround shouldn't be needed any longer. We have a user running Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 that is experiencing the same problem described in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263904 The current command did not succeed. the mail server responded: error in imap command uid: invalid body[..] parameter. Missing '>' in

This would be so it could auto-disable GLODA - its new 'Global Search and Indexing' scheme - for that account - assuming they accept (and implement) my bug request to be able to do that: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544100

Just a status note - my beta group is upgrading/upgraded to the new Thunderbird 2.0.0 (OS X & Win32 so far, Linux to come) and beating it up against Dovecot 1.0.0 and all is A-OK, nary a problem in sight. Obviously just an initial status report, but good mojo so far for those curious about trying it. -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

Hi, I am currently searching for storage solutions to use in an environment with two CentOS servers. Both are web/MySQL servers hosting several web applications that forward HTTP requests for files to storage servers (all with 3ware cards offering RAID5 arrays) that collectively serve 10TB of images. The data grows by 2TB every year. This has been working so far but this current implementation

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Jeff Boyce <jboyce at meridianenv.com> wrote: > Sorry for breaking the threading, as I only get the daily digest. My > comments (interspersed) begin with the **. > > <...snipped...> > > > Arch Linux create soft-raid - > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Software_RAID_and_LVM > > ** I had not found this one. My first

Have you tried manually putting the kernel/initrd files where they are missing from? Having said that, relying on this machine as a server seems questionable under the circumstances. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gilbert Sebenste" <sebenste at weather.admin.niu.edu> > To: centos at