similar to: Re: ATARAID on 2.4.19?

What is really puzzling me is that the ataraid device (/dev/ataraid/d0p1 mounted as /bigdisk) 2x 123GB IBM Deskstar's is formated as ext2...top and ps etc... show a fight between kjournald and kupdated and all searches for kjournald or kupdated fights suggest ext3 issues... :-) It's a RedHat 7.2, 2.4.7-10 custom kernal (I added in the Promise FastTrak support and HIGH mem support to

My system is RH7.2 with custom 2.4.18 or 2.4.19 kernel(s), downloaded from kernel.org. My root filesystem is ext3 on ataraid. I'm using initrd. My system comes up fine with 2.4.18 kernel, but when trying to boot a new 2.4.19 kernel I get the following sequence:

Today our server had seriuos problems, we had to reinitiate it and run fsck manually. Dou you think it's an ext3, kernel (vanilla 2.4.19) or hardware bug? The errors were (from syslog): -------------------------------- Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: 72:02: rw=0, want=230266240, limit=4882432 Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: attempt

Hi! Here is my isolinux.cfg. It's slackware based. ====================== default Kernels/bare.i/bzImage initrd=initrd.img load_ramdisk=1 prompt_ramdisk=0 ramdisk_size=8192 rw root=/dev/ram ZILIX_KERNEL=bare.i prompt 1 timeout 1200 font lat1-16.psfu display mensagem.msg F1 mensagem.msg F2 opcoes.msg F3 help.msg label linux kernel Kernels/bare.i/bzImage append - label adaptec.s kernel

hi, I was trying to use ext3 with quota and 2.4.18, but when the system had sustained load, eventually the system fell on deadlock. By that time, I was told to use the latest -ac patch, and maybe the problem would no longer exist. But instead I went back to ext2 and waited for 2.4.19 to come out. Now I tryed 2.4.19 with ext3 and all the same thing, but the system hanged up again. Please tell

hi, command-line parsing for kernels >= 2.4.19 doesn't work for me very well. i testet up to syslinux-2.01-pre3 and lines like APPEND nfsroot=192.168.168.1:/nfsboot ip=192.168.168.202:192.168.168.1:192.168.168.1:255.255.255.0:thin1 have no effect. bootmessage like: ... zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: Initializing CPU#0 ... even passing the command line parameters at the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am running a dual Athelon/Tyan MP system. It is a pretty simple minded setup, 512 MB ram + a few ide disks. No raid, no scsi, no disk quotas, no nfs, no samba. Recently I have been able to hang the system (requiring hardware reset, can't ping, console frozen) at will by doing large compile jobs. This has occurred with a stock RedHat 7.3

Hello After compiling and booting a RH 8.0 box with a 2.4.19 vanilla kernel i've started to experience some problems on my /home partition, (i/o errors on 2 files). After rebooting the machine failed the to mount /home and dropped me in the recovery shell. The fsck is still running after 9 hours. The system is a dual athlon MP with 1Gb ram and ASUS MB. the /home patrition is mounted on 3 120

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am very newbie to this group. I am working on ixdp425 embedded Board. I have brought up board with linux 2.4.19-rmk7-ds3 kernel with Qos support. Now i want to do traffic control (tc) on my board. Is there any patches available for this kernel and also application. I dont know which version of iproute2 is compitable one with

Hi everybody, I''ve got a little problem when adding HTB support to my SUSE 8.1 by patching its kernel 2.4.19. After i patch kernel getting some errors, the HTB kernel option shows up but when i make modules it finds something wrong with the sch_htb.o module. Could somebody give me a hand on this? Thanks in advance. I get this information when patching (patch -p1 <

A question about the tc binary and diff file that are included in htb3.6-020525.tgz. I can''t seem to patch tc in the source tree, and that has made me hesitate to alternatively substitute the native /usr/sbin/tc for the binary supplied with the patch materials. I''m running kernel 2.4.19-r9, and when I run xingu:/usr/src/linux #patch -p1 --dry-run < ../htb3.6.tc.diff the

Just looking through the 2.4.20pre changelogs, I see there's been a bunch of Ext3 patches since 2.4.19. I'm keen to take advantage of any bug fixes and performance improvements, but am nervous about using 2.4.20 until it's completed its release cycle. Is there any way to get a patch just containing the Ext3 changes? Are there any changes since 2.4.20 that are very important, either

Just wondering if someone could help me debug this: I was moving data from an ATARAID (via Promise FastTrack100 Controller) into the LVM device below: 58,1: # cat /proc/lvm/VGs/foo3/LVs/bar name: /dev/foo3/bar size: 476315648 access: 3 status: 1 number: 0 open: 1 allocation: 0 device: 58:01 # /sbin/pvscan pvscan -- reading all physical volumes

Hello, I've met some quite strange reboots recently on my home gateway. I'm trying to reduce its power consumption, so I've loaded the cpufreq(4) driver, and enabled powerd. After this the box started to reboot randomly all over the place. I started to think what can cause the trouble, removing the cpufreq(4) support would be too trivial, so I've removed the ALTQ references from

Hi, I have updated my old 2.4.7 kernel to 2.4.19 using the full download from kernel.org and installed samba-2.2.6 Using my old kernel i can access every share and everything works fine. Using my new kernel also everything works but samba,. i can telnet the system, ftp also works ok, but windows 2k tells me server not found if i try to acces the shares. i think, i forgot something to compile to

Hi there, : without index mount: root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 20000 real 1m10.501s user 0m0.240s sys 1m8.590s root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 100000 real 32m55.929s user 0m1.890s sys 32m2.500s : with index mount: root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 20000 real 1m8.428s user 0m0.350s sys 1m6.780s root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I applied this patch last night, installed e2fsprogs 1.30WIP, and now am seeing the following periodically in my logs: VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer issue? or not? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org gethostbyintuition()

OK,I have updated my wrapper and I have successfully build whole-program bitcode file for BIND 9.6.1 > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:40:43 +0800 > From: Nan Zhu <zhunansjtu at gmail.com> > Subject: [LLVMdev] I have built a whole-program bitcode file for > openldap-2.19 > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Message-ID: >

Hello CentOS, Does anyone know if there's a driver out there that'll enable CentOS 4.x to use the Intel Matrix SATA RAID settings on the 915 chipsets? -- Best regards, Mickael mailto:mike at kamloopsbc.com www.MickaelMaddison.com

--Qz2CZ664xQdCRdPu Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87" Content-Disposition: inline --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Unfortunately there is a very unpopular announcement to be made on this list: A netfilter security advisory. Phillipe Biondi has been