similar to: Access Samba Servers from the Internet?

DrTebi, I would setup a VPN (Which is outside the scope of this list) tunnel into your machine running Samba. Then you could use Samba as though you were locally connected to the network the Samba server is living on. Other then that, I wouldn't recommend using Samba connected directly to the internet. Of course, that is based upon my limited knowledge of Samba and network

i am running freebsd 4.6.2 i am using this command to mount a windows share from windows xp mount_smbfs //user@server/share_name /path/to/mount_point and everytime i get this message mount_smbfs: can't get server address: ssyerr = operation timed out i have also tried this command mount -t smbfs //user@server/share_name /path/to/mount_point and get the same message can any one give me some

Am 11.03.2018 um 11:53 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: > > I've experimented some more, and I have a partial success. Here, I'm > redirecting all HTTPS traffic *except* the one that goes to my bank: > > iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $IFACE_LAN -p tcp ! -d > www.credit-cooperatif.coop --dport 443 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3129 > > This works

Hello, I hope this isn't too off topic, but I'm attempting to set up a Spectralink 8002 Wifi phone with our Asterisk installation, and seem to be running into a brick well (more of a wall than others that have posted their experiences). My problem is that the phone boots, associates with the wireless, grabs an IP (tried static too - same thing), contacts the TFTP server for firmware, then

We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps international internet pipe / , as this: Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting Network lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an

I have a Samba AD running Samba 4.7.5. Everything was working fine, when, seemingly out of the blue, the users started to be denied access to all shares. If I try from a Windows 7 or Windows 10 machine, logged in as a user in "Domain Uses", I get: "Windows cannot access \\server-name\share_name. You do not have permission to access \\server-name\share_name" If I use

I'd like comments (suggestions, improvements, messages that start with "you moron you forgot that. . .") on the following horrible dirty kludge to make a (nearly, with any luck) un-hackable set of shares available to specific users on the internet. On the Server, initially all packets bound for port 139 are rejected as the default policy. The server is connected to the internet full

Here is another log from the * server CLI, I reall hope some one can help me out on this one. thanks |SELECT count(*) FROM vicidial_auto_calls where status = 'LIVE' and server_ip='127.0.0.1' and campaign_id = '' and call_time < "" and lead_id != '';| -- VDAD get agent: |0|update of vla table: |127.0.0.1 |UPDATE vicidial_live_agents set

On 12/03/18 11:28, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:11:44 +0000 > Sebastian Arcus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have a Samba AD running Samba 4.7.5. Everything was working fine, >> when, seemingly out of the blue, the users started to be denied >> access to all shares. If I try from a Windows 7 or Windows 10 >>

Dear Sirs, I have been given your e-mail address by Jeremy Allison. I would like to submit the following issue I have. You should also know I have been searching Internet for articles before and found that the behavior I wish you to help me with is quite common. The issue is the Samba 4 server integration into a Microsoft Windows network. I have done this and that configuration as particular

Hello, Is there any reason why an IP-phone would pounder on port 5060 ? My firewall blocks the public IP because it thinks the remote IP is port scanning on port 5060. I think the phone is just registering but for some reason it does this repeatedly in a very short time. Oct 28 09:01:48 astserver kernel: Firewall: *UDP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00

I just installed Samba for the first time. Installed and setup like a dream. Unfortunately, I can't login to save my life. The server appears in the Net. Neighborhood, but when I double-click to login, the login window give the following message: Incorrect password or unknown username for \\SERVERNAME Entering a username and password (from /etc/passwd) returns: \\SERVERNAME is not

In installed a new DC (Samba 4.12.8 on Ubuntu 20.4) and initially everything appeared to work smoothly. Now I experience issues: DCDIAG /s:cobra.samba.lindenberg.one Directory Server Diagnosis Performing initial setup: [cobra.samba.lindenberg.one] LDAP bind failed with error 1326, The user name or password is incorrect.. With the other DC (still samba 4.11.14 on Ubuntu

Hi all, I need to mount a Windows share locally on my laptop. However, I cannot do this via sudo mount -t smbfs //host_name/share_name /local_mount because the host_name has two IP addresses with it as shown by nmblookup //host_name. (That is, I try mounting and I'm given this error: mount error(115): Operation now in progress Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)

If in one time 3 IP adresses using internet. TC script: DEV=eth0 # LAN SERVER_IP=192.168.1.2 # eth0 ip address tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 255 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 384Kbit quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 384Kbit prio 0 quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128Kbit

Hello, I will take your last version, but I have fresher news about the bug that occurs every mornings in fact... I think this is ntpdate which is causing the problem, as the time of the machine change for more than one second. Here is all the info: 09:46:17 up 1 day, 1:22, 2 users, load average: 0.60, 0.71, 0.68 86 processes: 84 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU states: 10.4%

I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so I downloaded the relevant files from the install page. Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port. I''ve turned

I have a mail server running on Centos 7.2 which has been working for my LAN for a long time. I'm at the point where I have to make it accessible to the internet. At the moment, access can be insecure but as it's on my LAN it isn't an issue. However, for internet access I wish to force SSL/TLS. Having read the documents I think it's as simple as changing 10-ssl.conf from

HI all :-) Using debian stable (samba version 2:3.2.5-4 ) often I mount ntfs partition (using mount.ntfs-3g) of a usb external disk. So I can access from my lan to this usb disk. [usb0] path=/media/usb0 writable = yes browseable = no valid users = nick [...] when I finish to use this disk and I try to umount it samba doesn't release this the disk: umount /media/usb0 (or umount

I am new to samba and I have two questions. I have a linux box connected to a box running windows 98. Windows is set to share-level access control. 1. How do I allow nonroot users to "smbmount"? 2. When I mount a share as root, root has full access to the share, however, a nonroot user has read-only access. How do I allow a regular user to have full access to a share? Thanks