similar to: Mounting a Samba Share in /etc/fstab

What I've done so far: Studied man samba Connected to my parents XP box on my LAN (two different connections, even). root@omega-fleet root]# smbclient -L 64.131.112.121 added interface ip=192.168.1.11 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.1.10 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 session request to some.ip failed (Called name not present) session request to

I am having difficulty with Windows shares mounted with smb on my linux machine. The mount directory will not have write permissions for anyone, no matter what. The mount directory that I use is /home/samba. It has 0700, or drwx------ permissions when it is not connected to Samba. It is owned by the user jhall, and the group root. When I mount it, if I use dmask 0777, I get dr-xr-xr-x. If I use

Hello, I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them. For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab: devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0 Where /pool is a ZFS filesystem. This has worked until today -when I upgraded from a previous 7-STABLE (FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #16: Fri Mar 7 14:30:08 CET 2008) to today's STABLE- but not

Lifeform is a 16-bit Windows based Health Management piece of software that I have used for years. It will not install under Vista without doing something insane like installing virtualpc and a full blown XP install. I did get it to install under Wine, kinda. The creation of a program group and icons failed but I was able to do that part manually. Part of the application allows you to select a

Hello all, turns out i'm having a bad R week. I am at my wits end with a function that I am trying to write. When I run the lines of code outside of a function, I get the desired output. When I wrap the lines of code into a function it doesn't work as expected. Not sure what is going on here. I suspected that the syntax of the if statement with the for loop was the culprit, but when I

Does R do its own swapping out to disk? I disabled Linux swapping and the system still gets stuck in Purgatory where there's little CPU activity but the disk goes like crazy. That's with R having almost the whole machine to itself and running a memory hungry compute only function. I've seen this behavior with other version numbers but I'm running R 2.0.0 under Fedora Core 3.

Hi, I have a situation in the office where I temporarily need to provide additional clients access to a share on a Windows 2000 Professional box. 2000 Pro seems to only allow 5 clients to connect to a share and there is no faclity to allow more as best I can tell. Upgrading isn't really an option and as I said, this is a temporary need. I have a linux box as a gateway so I decided to map the

Hi, I am a long time OpenBSD user trying FreeBSD. I am attempting to upgrade my system from FreeBSD RELEASE 4.7 to "STABLE" This is my first post to this list so please be gentle : ) I followed http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html But when I get to "21.4.9 Install the New System Binaries" This happens: root@smeagol /usr/src # make

That makes way more sense, thank you so much! >From your description it sounds like you were assuming that “D1”, rather > than “D0B”, is the original block “D”. In the source, “D1” is “BodyBlock” > and “D”/”D0”/”D0B” are “Target” (and “D0A” is “DirectSucc”). > I’d guess that the “easy cases” remark corresponds to bailing out on EH > pads. Yeah I could see how exception handling

Referring to the log messages from my previous mail… I confused myself (and probably others) by reading the “Adding MemMgr 0x55555959f440“ message as “Registering MemMgr 0x55555959f440”. Thus the address mismatch made no sense. How could we be registering a `MemMgr` address/key that does not match once we arrive in `notifyObjectLoaded` method? Answer: Because the registrations is NOT coming

* Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com> [2019-10-08 08:07:10 -0400]: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 7:08 AM Szabolcs Nagy <nsz at port70.net> wrote: > > why is that ok? > > > > Because there are no FP exceptions/signals for this IR opcode: > http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#floating-point-environment so llvm cannot support an iso c frontend on an ieee754 target?

On 09/08/2017 01:53 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 08.09.2017 14:50, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've a broken IMAP server, which doesn't support pipelining and fails >> on dovecot's attempt to do this ([C] is dovecot's imapc, [S] is the >> IMAP server): >> >> [C] 24 LOGIN "user" "pass" >> [S] 23 OK

Hi, On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >> >> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively

On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend. >> Dovecot issues the above command sequence (SELECT and UID FETCH pipelined), which doesn't work with this server. >>

Hello all! (I apologize if I've ended up in the wrong list!) I'm trying to get a better understanding of LLVM's critical edge splitting, as documented in `Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h`; specifically in the case of critical edges which are indirect transfer. The code comments discuss the following example: a CFG with direct edges A->D, B->D, and an indirect critical edge

On 09/23/2016 08:05 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 29.07.2016 15:35, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> I use pass and userdb with dict protocol in a similar way: >> >> key passdb { >> key = passdb^MAuth-User: %u^MAuth-Pass: %w^MAuth-Protocol: >> %s^MClient-IP: %r >> format = json >> } >> >> (^M is an \r character, inserted with vi CTRL-v + enter)

Hello, I'm using dovecot-1.0.b9 on a FreeBSD 6.1 system. Usually we have 6 clients connected to dovecot through IMAPs. These clients are Thunderbird 1.5 programs. After some hours, one or two processed go up to 100% WCPU. As an example, this is what I see when I run 'top': last pid: 5111; load averages: 1.34, 1.82, 1.75 up 13+00:04:09 15:26:59 150 processes: 2 running,

I have an *Ubuntu 16.04* mail server with postfix/spamassassin/*dovecot-2.2.2**2* with virtual mailboxes in maildir format. The whole process is working excellently since a year. Spams are marked with "*****SPAM*****" in subject and with "X-Spam-Flag: YES" in email header. I tried now to add sieve to dovecot to move the SPAM messages into the Junk folder without any

On 09/11/2017 11:14 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 11.09.2017 11:59, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >>>> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>>> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly >>>> implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend.

Hi, I have two datasets stored in tab-separated format in the following way file1: country year1 year2 Germany var1 var1 Hungary var1 var1 file2: country year1 year2 Germany var2 var2 Hungary var2 var2 I can easily read in these files, but how can I merge them as a panel dataset? Thanks, Viktor