similar to: Assertion... buffer_jdirty(bh) - I read past archives...

I use redhat7.3 . Sep 20 20:39:31 Xhwsrhtrs2 kernel: Assertion failure in journal_commit_transaction() at commit.c:535: "buffer_jdirty(bh)" Sep 20 20:39:31 Xhwsrhtrs2 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Sep 20 20:39:31 Xhwsrhtrs2 kernel: kernel BUG at commit.c:535! Sep 20 20:39:31 Xhwsrhtrs2 kernel: invalid operand: 0000 Sep 20 20:39:31 Xhwsrhtrs2 kernel: autofs eepro100

Hello: My RedHat 7.3 machine just locked up and I could not reboot it. I had to punch the reset button. Here is what I found in the /var/log/messages file: May 19 12:50:16 server1 kernel: Assertion failure in journal_commit_transaction() at commit.c:535: "buffer_jdirty(bh)" May 19 12:50:16 server1 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ May 19 12:50:16 server1 kernel: kernel BUG

Hello,ext3-users: Yep, We meet the same problem. Jul 17 22:41:40 sh_intel5 kernel: Assertion failure in journal_commit_transaction() at commit.c:535: "buffer_jdirty(bh)" Jul 17 22:41:40 sh_intel5 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Jul 17 22:41:40 sh_intel5 kernel: kernel BUG at commit.c:535! Jul 17 22:41:40 sh_intel5 kernel: invalid operand: 0000 Jul 17 22:41:40 sh_intel5

We're getting the below errors about once a day on a system we're trying to set up with RedHat 7.3. This has happened to multiple filesystems on multiple physical and logical disks (basically we've got 4 drives as 2 sets of RAID 1 arrays, details below). Until a week ago, this box was a high-volume IMAP server running RedHat 6.2 with uptimes in the 200-day range, so I don't

Hi all I've been getting some emails from the R package maintainers that I need to update some code in a CRAN packge that uses FORTRAN, to comply with (not so recent) changes. I've been a little busy... I'm having trouble adjusting my code. I hope someone can help. The package was working fine, and a few R functions in my package had lines like this: tmp <- .Fortran(

Hello all, I have count data with about 36% of observations being zeros. I found in some of the examples of the r-help mail archives that a tweedie family of distributions could be used to fit a model with random effects. Upon installing the tweedie package and attempting to fit the following model: lmer(SUS ~ 1 + (1|

Dear Catarina, I prefer to leave the AIC value as NA for the tweedie GLM family because it takes extra time to compute and is only occasionally wanted. It's easy to compute the AIC yourself using the dtweedie() function of the tweedie package. Best wishes Gordon At 03:05 AM 14/08/2007, Catarina Miranda wrote: >Dear Gordon; > >I have also sent this email to R help mailing list,

Hi all (and developers in particular) I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the subject, and ends with: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the

Anyone got a clue about this: Server: DELL EdgeServer 2550 with PERC RAID card RH 7.3. Interestingly it happen with PureFTP and then started to hang socket connections until the box hung.. (or was it something else - maybe I have it backwards... that's why I'm comming to you guys..) Log entry in /var/log/messages: Jul 16 01:45:34 ETG3 kernel: <0>Assertion failure in

Dear R-users, I'm trying to model some data using a tweedie GLM approach. My response variable is the number of pupae that are the offspring of a subordinate wasp on a wasp's nest. However, they're not count data- for each nest, I only know the mean number of pupae per subordinate, which is continous. The data also contain a high proportion of zeros. I'm not very experienced at

Hi all. I am running the 2.4.18-3smp kernel and over the poast couple of days, ext3 has been crashing. Here is the output: Assertion failure in journal_commit_transaction() at commit.c:535: "buffer_jdirty(bh)" ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at commit.c:535! invalid operand: 0000 loop autofs nfs lockd sunrpc 3c59x ns83820 ide-scsi ide-cd cdrom usb-uhci usbc CPU: 0

Dr. Tweedie, et al.: I have decided to move to EXT3 from ReiserFS if I can get tail packing for EXT3. Last I had asked about it, someone had written some sort of patch but it was not official (I think), and was questionable if it had worked or not. Can someone tell me the status in the instant? If I installed 2.4.18 or a later kernel, would tail packing be part of EXT3? How would I turn it on or

Hello I am on Athlon 1Gz, kernel 2.4.8. I was running a perl pgm with a lot of disk access, deletions and symlinks creations... Maybe It is due to the kernel version. Could you please inform me if must upgrade to a more recent kernel ? Thanks a lot the kernel logs are : in errors logs Oct 18 17:31:16 tadorne kernel: Assertion failure in journal_revoke_Rb5884a32() at revoke.c:307:

Hello Folks, We have 2 (identical hardware) busy public 2U rack servers, both have several hundred users & peak email (for example) deliveries at 300/5min during the daytime. Both servers run RAID1 over 2 EIDE disk drives. One server is fine - it never has problems - it is running RH7.3 and CPU loads are normal. The other server has constant disk activity & kjournald at CPU load of

Hello there, I was wondering if somebody could offer me some advice on which error distribution would be appropriate for the type of data I have. I'm studying what continuous predictor variables such as grooming received, rank, etc. affect the amount of grooming given. This response variable is continuous with many zeros, and so positively skewed. So I can't use gamma because of the

Hi R-users: New to R and I am trying to run a GLM with random effects. I have 3 replicates ('Replicate) of counts of parasites ('nor.tot.lep') before and after an experiment ('In.Out'). When I run lmer I get the error messages (16 of each) below... > lmer(nor.tot.lep ~ In.Out + (In.Out|Replicate),data=coho, family =tweedie(var.power = 1, + link.power = 1)) Generalized

Hello everybody, Could someone please explain to me what is the difference between kjournald and jbd (precisely, what does each of them do?) Thank you, Alina _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Hi there, I'm using the tweedie distribution package and I cant figure out how to run a model using an identity link. I know I can use a log link by having link.power=0 and I think identity would be link.power=1, but I'm not sure. Furthermore when I try running it with link.power=1 it requires starting values which I cant manage to give appropriately so I'm not sure if its

Hello R-users, First my settings: R-1.8.1, compiled as a 64bit application for a Solaris 5.8, 64 bit. The OS has 8Gb of RAM available and I am the sole user of the machine, hence pretty much all the 8Gb are available to R. I am pretty new to R and I am having a hard time to work with large data sets, which make up over 90% of the anlyses done here. The data set I imported in R, from S+, has a

Hi Dr. Snow, I am a graduate student working on analyzing data for my thesis and came across your post on an R forum: The default link function for the glm poisson family is a log link, which means that it is fitting the model: log(mu) ~ b0 + b1 * x But the data that you generate is based on a linear link. Therefore your glm analysis does not match with how the data was generated