similar to: "Add user script" option never running?

I had a similar issue on my Debian box. It seemed that setfacl didn't care for special characters. I changed the separator character to - (dash) instead of + or \ and it worked fine. Good luck! Tom Hallewell Radio Free Asia Washington DC USA > > (offlist replies discontinued due to increasing large number of people > involved) > > Gareth Davies wrote: > >

Hi all, Well, I'm getting somewhere I think, I now have both ACL support and domain login basically working. However I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to proceed. Basically I want to copy over a large number of files and directories (~300k files, ~60Gb total) from an existing W2k server to a Samba server. These files have existing ACLs set, so I need to preserve them somehow. I can

Hi all, I'm having trouble making Samba recognise ACLs properly - a W2k client isn't using them fully. I have patched the kernel, recompiled Samba, etc. I've gotten it working to the point where the kernel-side of things seems to work fine (with getfacl, etc). Also, the W2k machine (via Samba) can see the ACL settings that are applied to a file. The problem arises when I try

Hi all, I have a 2.2.7a member server (on Debian unstable), acting as a file server for a W2k domain (which also has some NT4 clients, ie. mixed mode). I'm also using ACLs. Imagine I have a file on the server with an ownership of DOMAIN+foo (full permission - rwx). I also have a user ACL on that file of DOMAIN+bar, also rwx. This all works fine. I was initially running into a problem

Hi all, The two problems I'm having with ACLs on a W2k domain are still no closer to a solution. To wit, they were: (a) Users accessing the ACL properties dialog on W2k can modify and remove existing ACLs on a given file, but they cannot add new ones (that can only be done with setfacl on the cmdline; the changes are then recognised); (b) In said ACL properties dialog, the usernames

It sounds like smbd isn't linking to the acl libs-have you run ldd against winbindd to see if it is linking to libacl.so.1? I recently had very similar symptoms running 2.2.7 under Debian and I found that I wasn't compiling against the acl libs. Make sure you have the line (this might work best if you put this line before --with-msdfs) --with-acl-support in debian/rules, Plus you have to

You should be able to find the server in W2K's server manager and confirm that it is a trusted member of the Domain. It sounds like smbd isn't linking to the acl libs-have you run ldd to see if you are linking to libacl.so.1? My recent problem was similar and I found that I wasn't compiling against the acl libs. Make sure you have the line (Max said you should have this before

Hi all, I'm trying to use xcopy /o to copy files from a W2k file server to a Samba 2.2.7 box (Samba manually compiled with ACLs). I'm coming up with Access Denied, as documented here: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-June/074548.html I gather that the "force unknown acl users" config option is supposed to fix that, although I haven't had a chance to try it out

Hi all, I'm using the smbcacls command to query a W2k server from a Linux Samba 2.2.7a client. (This is for the script that I'm writing, which I will post soon - I know at least one person was interested...) It all works fine, but it's very slow - it takes about 1 second per file. "Very" in this case is relative, but since I intend to run it on ~150k files... I've

Sorry for the log log file dump, but while looking at some problems mapping drives, I've run across some stuff. Below is a chunk of my log when I successfully map a network drive from a WinXP client to a Samba 3.0-alpha18 server. The thing that bothers me is that it looks like my DOMAIN\USERNAME combination isn't being honored and I'm getting in based on a check to the locally

Me too, also gmail. I emailed the list owner a couple of days ago, but no reply. Is everyone else affected also forwarding to another email address (gmail or not)? Could be wrong, but I'm guessing there may be an incorrect DMARC policy somewhere - although this is the only fail I could find in the headers. bounces at lists.digium.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE)

Same about me - need to re-enable membership all the time. Annoying (( ??, 12 ???. 2017 ?. ? 15:59, John Novack <jnovack at comcast.net>: > Not just gmail > Happening as well with Comcast.net > > My Comcast address is set to forward to another domain, as Comcast seems > to now block sending mail with a non Comcast "from" address. they turned > that on a couple

Do you know if the same symptoms appear with Windows 2000? In your conf file, what is the autentication set to? Share, Domain etc? Dan -----Original Message----- From: Ladner, Eric (Eric.Ladner) [mailto:Eric.Ladner@ChevronTexaco.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:44 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] Trying to debug a WinXP - Win2000 ADS problem..HELP! I can't believe

I've been working on this all night without success... I'm setting up a HEAD (from today) test domain and want to join XP machines to it. I've applied the signorseal patch to the client I've set use spnego = no in the smb.conf I'm using ldapsam talking to a remote machine. smbldap tools all work to change passwords add/del users etc. i've set the ldap admin password via

Hi there! I appear to be having problems with trusted domains using 3.0a21. Using Samba as a member server, as user "nirs" on domain "Exanet-il" I am unable to log on to a member server ("snow") who is a member of the "Exanet-qa" domain. The "exanet-qa" is supposed to trust "exanet-il", and it all worked with 2.2 . This is the relevant

Can anyone help me? I''m having problems with the following code where I want to test the null hypothesis that regression slopes are the same among regressions. Here''s the code I''ve written with comments that include the final error I get. ... initial.dir <- getwd() library(systemfit) library(multcomp) basdata <- read.table("data_into7_test.txt",

I am configuring two identical PDCs so that, if one goes down, the other can start to serve logins. The first PDC, a Debian 3.0 with Samba 2.999+3.0cvs20020723-1, works fine. The second PDC, that I bring up after killing manually smbd and nmbd on the first one, is a Red Hat 7.3 with Samba compiled from the same sources (but with gcc2.96 instead of 2.95) and the same smb.conf, except for the

if i understand correctly, only the owner, and root, can change attributes of a file? thus, even though group members may be given permissions to write, and delete, a file, they cannot change attributes, without the workaround of copying and replacing the file? and do i understand correctly that on winnt and successors, permission to change attributes (eg 'everything' permission) can be

Hi, I have samba 3.0a21 running and NT 4.0 WS clients. All workstations were previously in Samba 2.2 domain , so now I upgraded to samba 3.0a22 and just changed domain name (workstation = XXX) and rejoined workstations by changing domain name in every WS. To look at the log it seems like NT WS sends empty username? *** ldapsam_search_one_user: searching

Now I could be way of base here, but I run 2 samba web servers with approx 8 people working with them. So my exp is limited. When I got here the boxes were set up with server level security and I had tons of problems with them. When I reformatted the units, I actually joined the samba boxes to the domain and set the security to "domain" I found these steps in an old version of Linux-Mag,