similar to: htree 2.4.19-dxdir patch

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I applied this patch last night, installed e2fsprogs 1.30WIP, and now am seeing the following periodically in my logs: VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer issue? or not? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org gethostbyintuition()

Hi Ryan, > I am running your program now over an hour without any corruption on the > loopback mounted ext3 filesystem. shit, I thought testing over an hour (10mins your program, umount, fsck -fD test.img in a loop) is enough but it isn't. Damn f*ck :( root@codeman:[/] # fsck -fD test.img fsck 1.29 (24-Sep-2002) e2fsck 1.29 (24-Sep-2002) Truncating orphaned inode 6871 (uid=0, gid=0,

Just out of curiosity: Is htree in 2.6.0-test11 ? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze - AIM. ralfpostfix

I've backported all of the bugfixes to the 2.5 dxdir/htree patches to 2.4, and have created a new set of patches for Linux 2.4.21rc5. At this point it *looks* like we've fixed all of the htree bugs that people have reported, including the brelse bug, the memory leak bugs, and the NFS compatibility problems. I've done *very* light testing, and things seem to work, but I'm now

Hi All, Is http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/ext3-dxdir/patch-ext3-dxdir-2.4.21rc5 the latest htree patch for 2.4 or should I be using bitkeeper to extract the patch?

Guys, I have recently applied the latest 2.4 htree patch on a heavily loaded nfs server. The nfs server serves around four very busy clients that deliver email in maildir format and pop3/imap clients. Being maildir I presumed that the htree patch would improve performance - but I was wrong. Load on the server went up by around 25-40%. After 3-4 hours of heavy use the clients load went up to

Hi Ryan, >> This is a completely fresh loopback EXT3 filesystem, untouched by fsck -D, >> and normally unmounted. > Oh, and I've attached the current version of my test program if anyone is > interested. > ... > It can corrupt my loopback test filesystems in under 5 minutes. Note that it > will completely destroy any data in its working directory, however. I am

There's a new set of ext2/3 patches for 2.4.21-pre5 available at: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/extfs-update-2.4.21pre5-2 and in broken out form at: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/broken-out-2.4.21pre5-2 New to this patch set include: * A kludge to help htree work well with Linux's NFS implementation * Allow the orlov allocator to be disabled via a

Wow, it takes a really long time to make a 2TB ext2fs. Are there better-than-default options that could be used for a large filesystem? mke2fs 1.34 (25-Jul-2003) Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) 244203520 inodes, 488382016 blocks 24419100 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=0 14905 block groups 32768 blocks per group,

Over the last two days we've been seeing a fair bit of this: ---- # ls -laR > /dev/null ... ls: ./server2/b/user/bxyz/392.: Input/output error ---- This is with the latest htree patches applied to 2.4.19, and latest e2fsprogs-test, on a dual AMD system, with 5x73GB SCSI drives on a MegaRAID controller. We're using the gcc 2.96 that comes with RH7.3. esfsck shows "Inodes that

Client: Bynari Insight Connector 3.0.5. (http://www.bynari.net/) This is an IMAP-based plugin for Outlook that can also store Outlook collaboration objects (calendar, tasks, notes, etc.) in IMAP messages on the server side. It does not require special server extensions, and it was actually (mostly) working with 1.0-stable. Below is a rawlog dump showing what is going back and forth. After

I've installed Sun's SUNWski package on Solaris 8 (32-bit) that provides a /dev/random interface. It appears to as cat'ing it gives me a bunch of well, random data. However, when I ran my configure, it gives me the WARNING.RND message to the effect that I'm using the built-in. I've seen allusions on this list to building openssl with to get random support, so I rebuilt it

Hi there, I'm using an embedded device sold by a german company called SSV. Further Information about the device can be found on the following URL. http://www.ssv-embedded.de/ssv/pc104/p170.htm The IDE Interface is a very basic one. Starting with syslinux 1.51 the system stopped booting correctly (1.67 does not work as well). With syslinux Version up to 1.50 erything works fine. The boot

Hi Guys, I am planning on upgrading an existing NFS exported filesystem to the ext3 htree patch on kernel v2.4.23. Will the patch index directories automatically after tune2fs -O dir_index or should I do an e2fsck -Dfy on the filesystem before remounting?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Have *ALL* the filesystem corruption issues that plague(d?) HTREE on 2.4.x cleaned up for 2.6? I believe they have, but before I enable this feature again, I'd like to be sure. Thanks. - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net && http://www.linux-sxs.org A day without sunshine

My reading of the kernel.src.rpm doesn't indicate that Severn has ext3 htree patches. Stephen, were there any issues seen during Cerberus testing ? Regards, Yusuf -- Yusuf Goolamabbas yusufg@outblaze.com

Hello, Could someone create some newer htree patches for the 2.4.x kernel? There are some bug fixes in the 2.4.21-rc releases that would be nice to have but the htree patches preceed those and they won't apply cleanly to later pre/rc kernels. It sounds like Marcelo may be about ready to put out 2.4.21 so it may just be worth holding off until that happens, but I don't suspect much will

Hi, Someone knows if the htree patch is applied in the last kernel for RedHat 8 (kernel-2.4.20-18.8) for the ext2/ext3 filesystems ? Greetings. --- Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó carles@unlimitedmail.org http://www.unlimitedmail.net/ ---

Well here is what I got from testing htree with NFS. http://labs.zianet.com/benchmarks_html/postmark_benchmarks_NFS_100_htree.html It looks like htree improves performance when the storage device is local(as per my previous post) but it looks like htree degrades performance when used in conjunction with NFS. I am going to try it with gigabit ethernet when I get the time to see if maybe I am

Apologies for the newbie question: I have a (stock) 2.4.20 build (*not* -ac), and I'm trying to work with large ext3 directories. By large, I mean 160,000 files per directory. (Yes, I know it would be better in nested directories but such is life). I feel htree would benefit me. Having upgraded from an earlier version of 2.4, I don't see any change, and close reading of the 2.4 changelog