similar to: What will happen when disk(ext3) is full while i continue to operate files ?

hi, My system will crash when the disk(ext3) is full while i continue to launch 50 proceses to operate files(such as create, rm, mv, ...). Does ext3 have such a capability to stop journaling the changes when it finds there is no space left? or which source file of ext3 do i need to check it? My System info: Redhat 7.3 Linux Kernel: 2.4.18-17 / : ext3 1.6G /boot : ext3 60M I

Just the sort of newbie question we all hate ;-) I'm a bit stuck with MOH. I think all is done right and I've read everyhing I can find, but whenever * tries to do MOH, all that happens is '-z: No such file or directory' Yes, I am on redHat. Yes I have installed real mpg123. Yes, it does seem to work from the command line. Any suggestions would be greta, I'm sire

hello: I have been reviewin my message slog and have found the following message: Dec 19 06:27:28 server02 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,7)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 What is error 28 and should I be worried about it? Ray Turcotte

Hi all, After much grief today, we'd like to support the 'TODO' note in source/lib/util_tdb.c :- /* TODO: If we time out waiting for a lock, it might * be nice to use F_GETLK to get the pid of the * process currently holding the lock and print that * as part of the debugging message. -- mbp */ It could have saved us a whole-sale restart of Samba if we could have more easily

I downloaded the jre-1_5_0_01-linux-i586-rpm.bin files and then run it as ./jre-1_5_0_01-linux-i586-rpm.bin. It resulted in an rpm file. and then i used rpm -iv jre-1_5_0_01-linux-i586-rpm Everything went fine and I didn't get any error. But when I do java -version ......i don't get any output. I would like to know whether java is installed on my system or not. PS: I have

Hello all. I have experienced an unusual behaviour from dovecot which I believe to be related to some interaction between dovecot and nss_ldap/Pam. Centos/Postfix/mbox(es)/Openldap/dovecot. The box is using PAM with ldap, and is also running BIND, SAMBA, and DHCPD. Dovecot 1.0rc2 from source. I left dovecot at the default, to use PAM for authentication and guess the mailbox. This worked

We are currently using Asterisk 1.0.8 and noticing a rather odd problem that occurs roughly during the middle of the day sometimes. It seems that Asterisk and Bellsouth are getting out of sync somehow on the the status of the PRI channels. I get warnings messages like: Jul 18 10:50:24 WARNING[744]: chan_zap.c:7585 pri_dchannel: Ring requested on channel 0/1 already in use on span 1.

Hello, i posted a question about a possible ext3fs bug a few month ago. I see this kernel-msg in the messages: Oct 8 18:30:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Oct 8 18:35:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Oct 8 18:40:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 they repead

Hi Jeremy, > The kernel checks the token attached to the process > at the time the process accesses the filesystem/resource. > > This is how OS'es work. It's how they *all* work. > > What you're complaining about is that changes to > the database that is used to create the process > token doesn't dynamically update running process > tokens. > >

http://go.cloudera.com/ml-h20-es-webinar?src=email1&elqTrackId=af5517eab2f543afbb31a0686d9ca566&elq=c68d9a8c25ba4b12944b8065d8a06e33&elqaid=4541&elqat=1&elqCampaignId= El 22 de junio de 2017, 22:59, Carlos Ortega <cof en qualityexcellence.es> escribió: > Hola, > > Tendrás RStudioServer en un nodo frontera de tu clúster. Y cuando lees > algo te lo estás

While compiling two kernels and untarring a third, my root fs was remounted r/w and I got the following in dmesg (kernel 2.4.19-pre9): EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Aborting journal on device ide0(3,2). ext3_abort called EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_journal_start: Detected aborted journal. Remounting filesystem read-only Remounting filesystem read-only

Hi, Subject line says it all. When one of the linux.org.uk machines got rebooted, it performed a full fs check of the main 160GB ext3 partition claiming it contained errors. During the check it found: Deleted inode 142279 has zero dtime. FIXED. The kernel message log contained lots of: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,1)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 We had used up all the available inodes.

Hi, I have a 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD box apparently hacked! Yesterday I ran chkrootkit-0.41 and I don't like some of the outputs. Those are: chfn ... INFECTED chsh ... INFECTED date ... INFECTED ls ... INFECTED ps ... INFECTED But all the rest is NOT PROMISC, NOT INFECTED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING DELETED, or NOTHING DETECTED. I know by the FreeBSD-Security archives that

hello list I have a network mounted home directory shared between all hosts on my network: [bluethundr at LCENT03:~]#df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 140G 4.4G 128G 4% / /dev/sda1 99M 35M 60M 37% /boot tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /dev/shm nas.summitnjhome.com:/mnt/nas

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:00:49AM -0500, Chad William Seys wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > > The kernel checks the token attached to the process > > at the time the process accesses the filesystem/resource. > > > > This is how OS'es work. It's how they *all* work. > > > > What you're complaining about is that changes to > > the database that

Hi Jeremy, > Because that's just the way the process model works. So security nuts didn't get involved early enough? Or maybe there is some performance problem of checking on each access (at least back when model developed). Or maybe the process model is more like gravity? That is how it is, but no-one knows why. ;) > Adding a user to a group won't change the token on

Hello, Over the last month or so, I've noticed the following error showing up repeatedly in my system logs under kernel 2.4.18-ac3 and more recently under 2.4.19-rc1: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,3)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 I've now been able to capture the following Oops before the system went down entirely: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611:

Hi! I fully understand and second efforts on educating people how to configure BIND to be stong to attacks and keep them from using "query-source address" with "port" option but how about binding named to particular IP address when host has many of them? Using "query-source address" without "port" is the only solution (not speaking of jails here) and safe

I'm not sure where else to ask about this, so please excuse me if this is the wrong forum. In trying to remove a 'nodump' flag on a directory with the 'chflags' command I have noticed that the 'nonodump' flag does not function. I see an open PR for the problem: o [2003/01/09] i386/46912 johan chflags nonodump fails I was wondering when this might be dealt with? Else is

Hi. I'm running Sernet Samba 4.7 on Ubuntu 16. I noticed that when my first DC went away, I had problems. The SOA record for the domain still points at that first DC. I found, in this entry from 2014 ( https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-August/184301.html) that "Windows AD servers actually 'lie' about the SOA record, and always say that it points to themselves. So in a