similar to: Painfully slow writes in MS-DOS

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Painfully slow writes in MS-DOS"

2003 Feb 15
1
File won't copy to client
This is strange, but I use samba for a software archive at work, and we are having trouble with Office 97. I traced it back to riched20.dll. The file is one the server, but it never copies. I can't even see the file. If i rename it, it shows up. What is up with that? /\/\/\/\/\/\ Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool. /\/\/\/\/\/\ coreyfro@coreyfro.com http://www.coreyfro.com/
2002 Nov 14
0
Reason for slow MS-DOS MS client writes
The low speed of writes with the MS-DOS, MS newtworking client has to do with the limit of MAXSENDSIZE (from TCPUTILS.INI) By default, the value is 1024, but the maximum value is 2048. If this value is not set to the same as the Samba server's SO_RCVBUF, then performence will suffer GREATLY. We had a Windows system hosting Norton Ghost images, but it took a dive, and our company has
2003 Apr 08
3
Automating cupsaddsmb or some alternative
I am developing a print server for a client, and I need to make the ability to add and configure print servers as simple as possible. So far, cups and samba are top notch, but there are two problems I have. One, I need to restart the samba service every time I add a printer. Two, I need to log in via console or SSH to run cupsaddsmb, and I need to then authenticate. I was wondering if there was
2004 Jan 05
0
No subject
2000) into dos, and with your boot disk, read the share listing of machine A from a linux box and mount it, and the rsync the whole drive if shared (say c:\ with c:\winnt and all the good stuff). Though, i still could NOT actually restore this 'mirror' image like i could a 'mirror' image of a linux root?? So, ultimately, there is no reason to even waste the hard-drive space
1998 Oct 09
0
Requesting simple assistance - details included.
Hi, could you please assist me with this problem? PROBLEM: Samba-1.9.17p4-3.i386 I CAN map Linux drives via Samba successfully from WINNT 4.0, but I can't see my samba server 'hurricane' in Network Neighborhood'. ACTIONS: diagnosis.txt results Test 1 - passed Test 2 - passed Test 3 - passed Test 4 - passed Test 5 - failed (nmblookup -B hercules '*' message: sending
2002 May 21
1
smbfs related oops
Hi [1.] One line summary of the problem: rsync segfaulting and the kernel oops'ing while synchronizing two smbfs's [2.] Full description of the problem/report: I am implementing file synchronization between two Windows NT 4 machines through two smbfs mounts. Rsync runs for about half an hour; then the kernel gives an oops and rsync segfaults. Hereafter the smbfs file system is
2009 Apr 08
1
watchdog timeout
Hello I have some problems with 3Com nics, after a upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.4-STABLE. This machine has two 3com nics (one is LAN other is WAN) and i see too much "watchdog timeout" on both cards. This on/off up/down on cards, affect the interrupt to clients that are downloading from apache web server, especially on large files. --------------------------------------------
2007 Jun 08
2
Can't get if_txp(4) to attach to a 3CR990B-TXM NIC
Good morning, I'm having a bit of an issue getting a 3CR990B-TXM NIC detected and usable. Just wondering if anyone knows of any issues with this NIC chipset and/or with the motherboard chipset. The motherboard is a Biostar GeForce 6100 AM2 using an nVidia nForce 410 chipset and nVidia GeForce 6100 vide chipset. I've tried FreeBSD 6.1, 6.2, 6-STABLE (from Wed), and 7-CURRENT (from
2008 Mar 05
0
--fake-super and xattr between Linux and Solaris 10
Hello trusty rsync list, I'm excited about --fake-super as it will replace too much work with none at all. I have gotten it to work under linux and I have a fair grasp with what is happening there. I have a problem, though, and that is, in the long term, I'll need to archive my Linux systems not to a Linux box, but to a Solaris 10 box. I understand that Solaris does have extended
2003 Mar 24
1
(Repost to list) Copying large files xp pro -> Samba very slow
I previously posted this to the linux.samba mailing list. I'm not sure that was the right place, so here it is again. Apologies if you've already seen it. Hi, I would really appreciate any hep with a big problm I'm having with XP (Pro / SP1 ) transferring to a samba share. The transfer starts off OK, using about 66% of my 100Mbs network. Then, after about 10-15 seconds, it drops off
2002 Aug 09
1
ext3 assertion failure
While doing this on an 80gig ibm ide drive: dd if=/dev/cdrom of=cd.iso I got the following assertian failure Aug 9 14:43:27 budder kernel: Assertion failure in __journal_remove_journal_head() at journal.c:1733: "jh2bh(jh) == bh" Aug 9 14:43:27 budder kernel: kernel BUG at journal.c:1733! Aug 9 14:43:27 budder kernel: invalid operand: 0000 Aug 9 14:43:27 budder kernel: CPU: 0 Aug 9
2014 Dec 29
3
sites and subnets
We had a samba 4.1.9 AD DC running since July. We have 3 campuses and brought up a secondary AD at another campus. This setup seemed to be running as expected. We could see our primary AD DC authenticating requests fine. We could see the secondary AD authenticating requests as well at our second campus. Then we started experiencing bandwidth issues between our campuses. Our metro-etherlink
2003 Oct 01
1
Upgrade to 4.8 STABLE - Root mount failed: 6
I have same problem on same class machine, here is dmesg from failing boot (via serial console): -------------------- Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p7 #0: Sat Sep 20 17:07:38 EEST 2003
1998 Jul 10
0
SAMBA digest 1743
On Sat, 11 Jul 1998 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > SAMBA Digest 1743 > From: Carlos Vidal <carlos@tarkus.se> > To: samba@samba.anu.edu.au > Subject: Problems accessing a W95 share > Message-ID: <199807091801.SAA03246@tarkus.se> > > Hi! > > I'm trying to use a printer connected to a Win95 box from Linux but when I try > 'smbclient -L
2003 Oct 01
1
4.9 RC1 (i386) mplayer induced panic
All: I cvsup'ed earlier this evening and am still able to reproduce this panic at will. Command line, panic backtrace, dmesg, ldd output, and mplayer version follow. If more information is needed, just let me know. % mplayer foo.mov [a quicktime file] [plays for awhile, and then panics] # gdb -k -s /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LICHEN/kernel.debug -e /var/crash/kernel.2 -c /var/crash/vmcore.2
2003 Apr 29
0
Kernel Panic in 4.8-STABLE
-- Previously Posted to FreeBSD-questions Update: I've changed the RAM in the machine. That seemed to fix the problem for a little bit, but the problem has started occuring again. Also, I'm not subscribed to the list, so please reply to this message directly. Thanks for all your help. -- Hello, Recently, I've been having kernel panics on 4.8RC. This made me upgrade to
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE #1: Tue Oct 10 18:09:51 CDT 2000 root@test-drive.tamu.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/TEST-DRIVE Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (501.14-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383fbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CM
2003 May 01
1
Youch! Painfully loud beep...
I just called 6610 from Zap/1 exten => 6610,1,Dial,Zap/1&Zap/2 (Don't try this with the handset pressed up against your ear) ...is this the call waiting indicator? Is it a file, can it be turned down - and does it get used anywhere else? These are both fxs ports. In zapata.conf changinging to callwaiting=no stops this. The text implies that this affects fxo ports. John This e-mail
2004 Oct 14
1
painfully slow uploads
I have several mail accounts, but collect all spam e-mail in the spam mailbox on one of them. After switching to dovecot (from imap-uw) I notice a very slow speed of bulk transfers and a very high CPU utilization by the dovecot's imap process during it -- sustained 62% of my server's Pentium2 @266MHz. Never saw such effects under imap-uw... My client is KMail (despite the awfull quality
2005 Aug 31
1
Painfully slow under windows
I did some testing on the speed. found tinc under windows is paintfully slow, particularly, it is paintfully slow to transfer anything from the windows machine. here is my setting. I have two windows xp in local network 100MB. use ftp to test speed. without tinc, the speed is about 5MB/sec. but through the vpn interface, speed is about only 10-20KB/sec. the next test, I installed VMWare 5.0 on