similar to: sticky bit, etc.

Hello Samba experts, Please read all email because i'm desperate!!!!! I have problem on joining to LAN-s using Samba. Finally i got a solution to "see" booth workgroups on "Entire Network", but i'm having problem with stations located in LAN2. From any station located in LAN1, I can see LAN2 workgroup and the browse list with stations located in LAN2, but when

I''m converting my network from a "one interface per segment" to a "single connection with vlans", well, some hardware I have requires using different vlan IDs. suffice it to say I need bridges to connect a few different vlans that should all be one but can''t be because of firmware constraints. so my first step is to get shorewall to know about bridges.

Hello to everyone, Here is the situation: [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\ | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet] [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/ Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24. So I need: LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other. LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24). All LANs have to get only internet. How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?

An very interesting test did yesterday that, LAN1 and LAN2 setup an tinc VPN which is quite simple(the physical link between tinc nodes are quite stable/fast), and no any application traffic to go through the tinc. Later, I setup smokeping which LAN1 initial 20 ping to LAN2 on a per-minute basis, but as you saw from the below picture, it had packet drop. But if I perform a constantly ping from

Hi, We have a 256 kbits/s (kilobits per second) link to the internet. it is a router running Linux that belongs to our ISP. They have given us 8 internet ips. (i.e- subnet is 255.255.255.248). one has been given to this router. I have given another internet ip to the firewall running CentOS 4.5. iptables is running on it. And also, I have installed iproute2 pkg as well. pls see below for

Hi, list members. I''ve been reading a lot about traffic control because at work we have the following configuration...... LINUX BOX _____ 100 mbit | | LAN1--------------|eth0 | | | 2 mbit SDSL | eth1|-------------------INTERNET 100 mbit | | LAN2--------------|eth2 | | | ------- The linux box (REDHAT 9-2.4.20-30.9) acts as a firewall-NAT solution for both

Dear Friends, I have been using shorewall for some years. I want to set up "shorewall 2" router behind firewall, accordind to this picture: I have lost at setuping "zone"-s (wifi, lan1, net). Plese help me ! Thanks, psw net | | SHOREWALL 1 ------- lan 1 | | |wifi | | SHOREWALL 2 ------- lan 2 | ---------------- lan 3

I have the following situation: A Linux 2.4.22 server: Physical ethernet: lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet) lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port) Tunnel: tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode VLAN's: lan2.201 lan2.202 lan2.203 tap1.201 tap1.202 tap1.203 Bridges: br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201) br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202) br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203) On the other end, the same type of server:

Hello, I am a newbie in Asterisk IP PBX but I am very impressed by its functionalities. I have read that It can work over IP network and across the PSTN. I am not very sure how it works over the PSTN.. In case if people have not yet the Internet or SDL access, I would like just to know if it is possible to interconnect two IP LANs using the traditionnal analog Network and Asterisk PBX? In such I

Is there a way to specify a variable for the gateway in /etc/shorewall/providers? I have in my scenario: eth0 dsl (static IP) eth1 cable (dhcp assigned IP) eth2 lan1 Is it possible to specify the gateway as a variable based on the current DHCP lease (like $eth0_gw)? I''m following the documentation at http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_and_Routing.html. -Scott

I'm new at this - perhaps my terminology is not correct. I've been trying to set up 3 shares on a samba server (latest version supported on Ubuntu 8.04), and I'm having mixed success in obtaining the behavior I desire: My server, cayenne, is in the DOCS workgroup, and has these shares: PUBLIC - read-only by anyone, writable by 'docadmin' members SUBMIT - the common place for

Hi all, I''m running Xen-3.2 and linux-image-2.6.18 as Dom0 kernel on a VT-x processor. The problem is that broadcast arp who-has packets are not seen in Dom0 kernel. I''ve tried both precompiled debian kernel and compiled latest one from sources as described at http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2008-01/msg00699.html There is no linux bridge invoked,

Hopefully this is a simple issue or just my ignorance on the results returned by "df -k" but can anyone explain why the available block is 0 if total 1k-blocks - Used is greater than 0? #df -k /ems/bigdisk/ Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg0-bigdisk 397367512 383562960 0 100% /<name> Filesystem volume

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: > Not true, it reveals that I forgot to put it in the patch, that's all. As > I cannot run several of these tests because of memory constraints I link > the file to a copy in a rw area where I modify the list and just run one > of the subtests at a time. If I try to run the whole it always fails > after a couple of

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

I have an ext3 filesystem that has several directories and each directory gets a large number of files inserted and then deleted over time. The filesystem is basically used as a temp store before files are processed. The issue is over time the directory scans get extremely slow even if the directories are empty. I have noticed the directories can range in size from 4k - 100M even when they are

Problem: We have a share defined using Samba 3.5.8 on AIX 6.1. Several people can map a Windows Network Drive to the share and it works fine. Several other people get Windows errors or system errors when trying to map a drive to the same share. Command line errors (from the net use command): System error 59 or System error 64 Windows Explorer error: The specified network name is no

Hi, I have a linux system which is router between several subnets (each also a different segment), in total 3 different lans, 2 dmz, and 4 internet connections, my default FORWARD policy is DROP, here is a simplified example of my config with only two lan segments and internet connection: Allow forwarding between lans -A FORWARD -s lan1/mask -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -d lan1/mask -j ACCEPT -A

Hi all I have a problem splitting traffic behind 2 adsl. My situation: _________router2 | lan1 ------- fw ----------- router1 | lan2----------| lan1 use router1, lan2 router2. The linux default gw is set to router2, lan2 browse internet without any problem (icmp, tcp..). Lan1 is blocked. >From lan1 i can ping router1, and i''ve set

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |