similar to: strange locks

Al, Could this be included in the vfs queue? This patch adds ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy XFS pre-allocation ioctls (XFS_IOC_*RESVP*). The implementation effectively invokes sys_fallocate for the new ioctls. Also handles the compat_ioctl case. Note: These legacy ioctls are also implemented by OCFS2. Signed-off-by: Ankit Jain <me at ankitjain.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph

Hi, I don't understand why this doesn't work: matTest <- matrix(nrow=3, ncol=3) testMove <- function(I, J){ for(i in 1:I){ for(j in 1:J){ matTest[i, j] <- i+j } } } testMove(2, 3) matTest Why the elements of the matrix matTest are still NA? How could I fix it? Thanks, Ken

Hello, I see a reproducable panic when doing ibping and aborting it with ^C. My setup is two machines with Mellanox Infinihost III HCAs (one Linux one FreeBSD) connected back-to-back. Details below. I can upload 2 crash dumps, if this is useful. For some reason the port doesn't become ACTIVE, so no packets arrive, but that is probably unrelated. % uname -a FreeBSD cosel.inf.tu-dresden.de

We're currently support two paths from VFS to preallocate unwritten extents(from FS_IOC_RESVSP, or fallocate()), likewise, behavior of punching-hole should be treated as the same, this patch tries to teach file_ioctl() to handle FS_IOC_UNRESVSP, underlying filesystem like ocfs2 is wise enough to do the rest of work;-) Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye <tristan.ye at oracle.com> --- fs/ioctl.c

We're currently support two paths from VFS to preallocate unwritten extents(from FS_IOC_RESVSP, or fallocate()), likewise, behavior of punching-hole should be treated as the same, this patch tries to teach file_ioctl() to handle FS_IOC_UNRESVSP, underlying filesystem like ocfs2 is wise enough to do the rest of work;-) Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye <tristan.ye at oracle.com> --- fs/ioctl.c

Hi, My Samba AD-DC installation is using CPU all time on a process. I'm trying everything to fix it, but without success. It started when using it on Ubuntu 16.04, I upgraded o Ubuntu 18.04, and now Ubuntu 18.10, that is using Samba 4.8.4 and the problem persist. Using samba-tool process, I could see that the process using resources is CLDAP. I did samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs samba-tool

The parts of klibc specific to the mips architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 8dc79563c06020d8844b9e9b821741828039b59e tree b957c8fb1fddf486f5c26b1880726051d4f6aaad parent bc9b363b31d301ab94c115cccc2e079c0d318498 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:31 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

Jessie also has the problem, even before the meltdown patches. The kernel 3.16.x had ksoftirqd probems, eating up cpu cicles. Make sure you use kernel 4.9.0-6 And i suggest move up to samba 4.7.x or 4.7.4 from debian/buster, Or use my 4.6.12/4.7.6 packages for stretch, or ask if Tranquil.it can make them. The 4.6.14 is still in the make atm for stretch, 4.6.14 for jessie is done. And last,

Hi Louis, Move up to 4.7 is planned soon but I'm little scared to update bridgehead if it actually had performance problem. I would like to fix all problem before updating. My smb.conf is really simple: [global] workgroup = PR realm = pr.educationetformation.fr netbios name = DC000 server role = active directory domain controller bind interfaces only

Hello, I'm trying to figure out a problem with our AD DC with the FSMO roles, name DC1. When starting the Windows RSAT Active Directory Users and Computers program against DC1 it takes about 90 seconds to load. A samba process on the server is at 100% CPU while waiting for it to load. Once loaded the CPU goes back to normal. When connecting the Active Directory Users and Computers program

Hi everybody ! I am encountering performance problem on my bridgehead DC. I have 19 DC (Debian Stretch / Samba 4.6.7 from Tranquil.it repo) and they all synchronized on a main bridgehead DC. This performance problem first appears when the bridgehead DC was on Debian Jessie and kernel was updated with meltdown/spectre patch from Debian (3.16.51-3+deb8u1) I added "nopti" option to grub

Dear All, We're running smbd "Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu", and it populates our log files with these two lines per every connect: === [2016/07/18 18:42:31.544726, 1] ../source3/printing/printer_list.c:234(printer_list_get_last_refresh) Failed to fetch record! [2016/07/18 18:42:31.544780, 1] ../source3/smbd/server_reload.c:69(delete_and_reload_printers) pcap cache not loaded

Hai, Can you tell the following that helps. OS ? Samba Version? ( pre-builded or source ) Kernel version? I think you need to wait for 4.9.4 if all patches ive seen on vfs_fruit are getting in. These might help. Go through bugzilla, you might find more about this here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]

Commit-ID: 11bd4ea5f3d960c4d208180deae91d88aa940149 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=11bd4ea5f3d960c4d208180deae91d88aa940149 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:39:34 +0000 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:45:04 +0000 [klibc] fcntl: Fix struct flock

Listing directories with many files (10000+) from a Windows client is nociceably slower when vfs_fruit is enabled on the samba server compared to the same setup without vfs_fruit. On my setup it's roughly 2.5 times slower. To me it looks like this is caused by the getxattr call which is only present with vfs_fruit activated and introduces an additional delay of ~ 0.00033 s per listed

Hi I look at list archives and at samba docs but I did not found ... please can some one help me? I have to write a unix program that need to check if it can write to a file and place the apropriate locks before write. Those files are in a Samba share. I intend to use fcntl() function to check and set the locks. I wrote a test program to see if the fcntl() function can see the samba locks

I got more information ,after enable log_level to 10: ``` push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3 push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 2 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3 Security token: (NULL) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups Adding cache entry with key=[ACCT_POL/password history] and timeout=[Thu Jan 1 03:00:00 AM 1970 MSK]

Hi Slight problem - linux 2.4 running dovecot, Solaris 2.8 home directory server. Full lockd support etc. I had to make the following code patches (at end of mail for clarity) to get dovecot to read the users mbox files at all. 1) fcntl with F_SETLKW will not work against a Solaris 2.8 server as proved with a small test program. Other forms of fcntl (ie F_SETLK) are OK. I noticed there are

Sure. ``` [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE server string = dns proxy = no interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 # new options log level = 5 netbios name = FILES #panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d server role = STANDALONE SERVER local master = no security = user encrypt passwords =

I've been trying to determine if a file is locked by samba from unix. Is there some magic incantation to find this? E.g. if someone is copying a file in from a windows system via samba. I'm using the default locking parameters on 3.0.10 with a 2.6 kernel. I've tried checking posix byte ranges, posix locking, and kernel op locks. Here is my test program: #include <sys/types.h>