similar to: One Time Migration script from a Windows NT 4.0 PDC to a Samba PDC

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 Corentin Delcourt <codl at codl.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |codl at codl.fr --- Comment #8 from Corentin Delcourt <codl at codl.fr> --- Note that Arch Linux's

Hi devels, there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: 1. this document: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain examples on optimization step. 2. If i am not wrong there is no tool, which integrates all steps: llvmgcc->opt->llc into something like llcc (and

Hello Samba team ! I'am in a very delicate situation. After an upgrade to debian Stretch my DRS stopped working. I have three DCs (fichdc, fichds01, fichds02), all Debian Stretch, all with the same problem. Everything seems to be fine except DRS. -> File shares works -> DNS (with bind9 DLZ) works -> "kinit administrator" works -> "kinit -k FICHDC$" works ->

21.06.2017 11:45, L.P.H. van Belle via samba пишет: > I suggest before you upgrade do a very good read here. > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba#Notable_Enhancements_and_Changes > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Features_added/changed_(by_release) > And a summerize version for with all parameter changes as of upgrade from 4.2 up to 4.6 >

this is at the bottom of auth.c. What is it? struct passwd * fakepw(void) { static struct passwd fake; memset(&fake, 0, sizeof(fake)); fake.pw_name = "NOUSER"; fake.pw_passwd = "$2a$06$r3.juUaHZDlIbQaO2dS9FuYxL1W9M81R1Tc92PoSNmzvpEqLkLGrK"; fake.pw_gecos = "NOUSER"; fake.pw_uid = -1; fake.pw_gid = -1; fake.pw_class =

This is on Solaris 10 x86, do not see this behavior on Solaris 10 sparc. Seen on multiple machines. Sshd debug: debug1: server_input_channel_open: ctype session rchan 256 win 16384 max 16384 debug1: input_session_request debug1: channel 0: new [server-session] debug2: session_new: allocate (allocated 0 max 10) debug3: session_unused: session id 0 unused debug1: session_new: session 0 debug1:

On Sat, 1 May 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: > > 1. > this document: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html > is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section > > An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain > > examples on optimization step. That's an

On Sun, 27 May 2007, Aaron Gray wrote: >> I just checked in a new LLVMBuilder class into llvm/Support/LLVMBuilder.h, > It does not seem to be on the LLVM cvsweb, is that still showing 1.9 or 2.0 > and not cvs ? It is there: http://llvm.org/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/llvm/include/llvm/Support/LLVMBuilder.h?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:31:02 +1200 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 11:13 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > > Now choose, of > > dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab > > To be clear, this parameter is not used in the AD DC. > > Thanks, > > Andrew Bartlett > Shouldn't that be

2017-06-21 14:29 GMT+02:00 Prunk Dump <prunkdump at gmail.com>: > Thank you very much Louis, Rowland, Mike ! > > I have made all the changes proposed by Louis but still have the same problem. > > -> kinit works now with /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab > ------------------------ > ~# kinit -k -t /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab FICHDC$ > ~# >

Hi samba team ! I'm face with a new problem on a new Samba PDC install (Debian 9). I don't know why, but systemd run multiples "rndc reconfig" commands during the init script. So the bind9 log file show : -> A successful start -> A failed reconfig (samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone) at each boot/reboot. So I need to restart bind9 each time manually. I created a wrapper

Hai Baptiste, What you can try; Type: ktutil (enter) rkt /etc/krb5.keytab rkt /var/lib/samba/private/krb5.keytab list Now check if you see, host/server.internal.domain.tld at REALM host/server at REALM (same (both) for nfs/.. at REALM) And NETBIOSNAME$@REALM If you see all, you can write this back to a new file. wkt /etc/krb5.keytab.new1 And if needed you can also cleanup the keytab

Hai Baptiste, You missed my first message but here it is again. . systemctl cat bind9 # /lib/systemd/system/bind9.service [Unit] Description=BIND Domain Name Server Documentation=man:named(8) After=network.target Wants=nss-lookup.target Before=nss-lookup.target [Service] EnvironmentFile=/etc/default/bind9 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -f $OPTIONS ExecReload=/usr/sbin/rndc reload

Hello, I read in the announce of Xen 3.2.0 released that it has "preliminary support for a wider range of bootloaders in fully virtualised (HVM) guests, using full emulation of x86 ''real mode''" . I''d like to know what is the level of the emulation of x86 ''real mode''? I ask that because I tried to install OpenSuse 10.3 (I used the iso file

Dear all Lartc, I try to split my Internet access to my 2 ISP with 1 linux (GNU/Debian sarge) 3 NIC router, I want all my users conneted with ISP1 and just some IP connected with ISP2 Here is my configuration: Internal network: 10.117.71.0/24 Interface eth0 ISP1: IP for my linux box: 1.2.3.4/29 Interface: eth1 Gateway: 1.2.3.5 ISP2: IP for my

I wrote: > If you look at the 3 lines above the assert that is failing, you'll see > this: > // FIXME: This code should handle a couple of common cases efficiently, but > // it should also implement the general case by code-gening a new anonymous > // nullary function to call. > Basically it's saying that we only support one argument functions that > take

I'm running 'make check' to run the testsuite, and I did it this way so the ssh-basic test would run: # export rsync_enable_ssh_tests=yes # make check I did set up ssh so this would run, and here's what I get for output: POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 TOOLDIR=`pwd` rsync_bin=`pwd`/rsync srcdir="." ./runtests.sh ============================================================

Hi, Suppose I want to redefine the Ruby String class in a Rails app. In which file is it the most suitable to write the redefinition? Thanks Guillaume Carbonneau -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060816/5b0da204/attachment.html

> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> I just checked in a new LLVMBuilder class into >>> llvm/Support/LLVMBuilder.h, >> It does not seem to be on the LLVM cvsweb, is that still showing 1.9 or >> 2.0 >> and not cvs ? > > It is there: >

Okay, it's done. Here is the file Le mar. 6 ao?t 2019 ? 10:55, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 06/08/2019 09:36, Guillaume Couvreur wrote: > > it doesn't work, here is the log file > > Nothing there, can you try raising the log level ? > > start by adding: > > log level = 4 > > to smb.conf and restart Samba and