similar to: samba & fat32 lockup my linux machine

I know syslinux supports FAT16 and works very well, but how about FAT32? Does syslinux support FAT32? If so, which version? eg., 3.11 and above Thanks!

When trying to installing Syslinux on a FAT32 drive formatted using Ridgecrop's Large FAT32 formatting tool [1], the installer will bail due to the minfatsize check, as there is an extra sector being used. This fix addresses that. [1] http://www.ridgecrop.demon.co.uk/index.htm?fat32format.htm -------------- next part --------------

Sorry for the late response. I am set to digest on this list. One of my chief complaints about mailman (besides non-searchable archives), is that you can either get every message or digest, but not "digest except for threads to which I have responded for which I want every message directly". > The command line installers have the core module and the bootloader file, all embedded

hello, I plan to use rsync for backing up my data to a FAT32 USB disk. I'm running the last Mandriva linux 2006 and my filesystem is ext8 using UFT-8 charset. I run into a problem with some of my folders that have full caps names on the ext3 disk (/home/foo/BAR/ for example). When rsync creates the folder on the USB disk, it doesn't create /home/foo/BAR/ but /home/foo/bar/. And then

Hi, I have a problem backing up my music collection, that is stored on a fat32 formated hard drive to my ext3 formated backup drive (ext3 to ext3 works like a charm :) ). The problem is, that rsync always transfers all of the files and not only the one that were changed/added. I know of the limitations fat32 has but I can't find the correct options to run the backup. Thanks Thomas

Hi, I have been using rsync for over ten years. Thank you! It is a great tool. Recently I had the misfortune to have to use it to sync files to a USB stick that is for a platform that only supports FAT32. After missing the point a few times and having it copy some of the same directories and files needlessly I saw the timestamps on the source files (in reasonable filesystems like JFS, XFS,

Hi, I am not an engineer or linux expert but I have been using syslinux to boot live disk filesets (extracted from iso's) residing on fat32 and NTFS volumes. In FAT32 there has been no problem going with larger cluster sizes up to the nominal maximum of 64K however, with NTFS it has not been possible to exceed the cluster size of 4096. With NTFS formatted using clusters of 8192 or larger,

Hi... I decided to delete my fat32 partition (sda1, with win2k on it). I did that with fdisk and added a linux partition, then formated it with "mkfs -t ext3 /dev/sda1" ... Everything seemed to work fine... I can even mount it with "mount -t ext3 /dev/sda1 /mnt" ... but there seem to be some fat32 rubbish left because when I do "mount /dev/sda1 /mnt" it seems to

I am trying to mount a FAT32 partition in CentOS. I'm following the instructions on this page: http://www.linuxforum.com/linux_tutorials/14/1.php This is the line I put into /etc/fstab /dev/hda /mnt/windows vfat users,owner,rw,umask=000 0 0 And this is the error I get: [root at localhost mnt]# mount -a mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on

Gene, thanks for doing "Reply-All". I only get digest, so this keeps me in the loop. Appreciated. > which appears to be included in diskstart.inc. I will have to dig in and > see > > how this all gets compiled (pointers always appreciated :-) ). > > Yes. > Is the build process documented? Or am I just going to have to plod through the makefiles? > As Ady said,

Hi Syslinuxers, I am trying to understand the basic load chain in fat32 and ext4. I dug into the assembly for MBR, which is pretty straightforward: 1. Find boot partition (or use the pre-defined one at byte 440 for altmbr.bin) 2. Load the first 512-byte sector of the partition (VBR for fat32, Block Group 0 padding for ext). 3. Execute that code The code that is loaded, however, has to be too

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10675 Summary: rsyncing >2GB file onto fat32 partition should fail earlier Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Thanks for the response, Gene. Much appreciated. I didn't get all of it; mind if I follow on below? ldlinux.sys is ldlinux.bin without the VBR (Volume Boot Record) code. > Makes sense. > > 1. Where is the code that goes in the VBR or Block Group 0 padding? > > diskboot.inc. > which appears to be included in diskstart.inc. I will have to dig in and see how this all gets

> You might want to read Wikipedia's articles about "FAT32" and "Design of the FAT file system", Good pointer. I spent far far too long on that page figuring out how fat32 is designed. But the reserved sectors, there is the key. > reserved sectors Right! Immediately after the FSIS before the FAT.And it usually is 32 sectors for fat32. Take off the VBR and the FSIS,

Hi Ady, I won't comment on the reasons why the original computation was wrong, but thanks for the detailed analysis. On 2016.02.26 08:05, Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> Thus we can finally get a formula for Fs that satisfies the above: >> >> Fs = (To - Rs + Nf * Cs) / ((Ss * Cs / Fe) + Nf) + 1 > > I believe such formula is slightly inaccurate too. > > My

I am trying to rsync some files from ext3 to fat32 pen drive. What is the correct way to do this? I am currently using, --progress -av --no-o --no-g --exclude '*iso' /ext3 /fat32 Are there any other options I should consider? TIA

Hi, The following are my steps: 1. Insert a FAT32 format HDD into usb port of Linux PC. 2. After HDD mounted successfully, configure and start samba to share the HDD. 3. Using Map Network Drive of Windows XP to map the HDD to a windows network drive. 4.Open the mapped network drive, can see "NTFS" file system on the left details. It shows the wrong info, could anybody help me? Thanks

Thanks a lot, Kevin. I have a new Linux box and tried to set it to UTC but I think gnome outsmarted me... I'll use -rt and maybe ignore timestamps entirely rather than the window. If I find something wrong on the USB stick I can always copy it again. I love the -c option, but it takes forever on slow media. John On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 13:27 -0500, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote: > #1 yes,

> > > Is the build process documented? Or am I just going to have to plod > through > > the makefiles? > > I don't think so. > Oh well... > > 1. Run installer > > 2. Installer loads ldlinux.sys onto the filesystem (and copies > ldlinux.c32, > > but irrelevant for now). > > 3. Installer calculates which blocks in the filesystem contain

Hi Ady, On 2016.02.25 02:08, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > There is an "extra" sector, in comparison to... what exactly? Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think I implied that the Large FAT32 fat size had an extra sector compared to minfatsize, when of course I meant the opposite (the Large FAT32 has one less sector than the minfatsize computed by the unpatched code, hence the check