similar to: Win95 Issue

For some reason I'm getting Access denied errors when I try to execute a .bat file that resides on a TRU64 samba share, from a Win95 command prompt. The drive is mapped as x:\ & for the sake of testing, the directory has been recursively set to 777 (chmod). Command prompt output: x:\> x:\r235\src\ntprpst\sharc\mta\src\build_sharc_fta.bat Access denied -

Anyone have any idea if the any of the Sharc or TigerSHARC DSPs are powerful enough to do realtime Speex? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.

They claim to max out at 1,800 MFLOPs And have a clock speed of up to 300 mhz. Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >Tell me how fast these chips are, I'll tell you if there's a chance... > > Jean-Marc > >Le jeu 18/12/2003 à 16:52, David Siebert a écrit : > > >>Anyone have any idea if the any of the Sharc or TigerSHARC DSPs are >>powerful enough to do realtime Speex?

I've been looking around for DSP backend projects (like f.i. ADIs SHARC), is there any such ongoing projects to the knowledge of the list members ? TIA /Rob

I''ve looked everywhere and I haven''t been able to find a solution. I''m running Apache and I have an app under version control (svn). I want to be able to have multiple check-outs on one server, and I don''t have to modify httpd.conf every time I do. Basically, I envisioned that it would work like this: There''s a development server:

On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >>> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >>> build_llvm) into the top-level directory.

I have been losing my mind over this problem, so any ideas are welcome. When running non-interactive jobs on remote machines, I want output to stderr and to stdout to remain separate in two streams just as if they were run locally. I also want jobs running remotely to die when I press Ctrl-C just as if they were run locally. At first glance these do not seem to be mutual exclusive, but when you

AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary to R_LIBS_SITE, it fails for R_LIBS_USER and the user's personal library is still available for test scripts. Should I revise my assumptions, or is that intentional? The short version. Shouldn't: $ R_LIBS_USER='' Rscript --vanilla -e

Hi, Why isn't 'R CMD check --force-multiarch' installing the package for all the architectures that are going to be checked? For some packages, it only installs for the default arch ('i386'). Then testing the package for 'x64' fails. For example, Output of R CMD check --force-multiarch fabia_1.5.0.tar.gz: ----------------------------------------------------------- *

Thanks Cristoph, I have that code in my backend, but unless I do the following, the registers are never considered 'live' into the call. / Handle a function call let isCall = 1, Defs = [ R0, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37, R38, R39, R40, R41,

hi list, SHARC, is a kind of DSP Processor from ADI. Who are making a backend for it, or already have one? If your code's not for business, would you mind share it for me? even incomplete is appreciated. Thanks, all. linduan at isoftstone.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Le ven 19/12/2003 à 09:38, David Siebert a écrit : > They claim to max out at 1,800 MFLOPs > And have a clock speed of up to 300 mhz. Are you kidding? Not only is this enough to encode/decode in real-time, but you can probably do ~50 channels (or more) at the the same time. Jean-Marc > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > >Tell me how fast these chips are, I'll tell you if

Trying to figure out a good way to implement this into an Analog Devices 21065L. Has anyone tried this yet? Any pointers? Available source code to start from? New to the Speex side, but am quite experienced at audio dsp processing in a Sharc. Thanks a lot in advance, John

On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >> build_llvm) into the top-level directory. > > Why not: > > $ RC_ARCHS="x86" make > echo Apple Build.

Hi Micah, > In X86InstrInfo.td for Call Instructions, it mentions that Uses for > argument registers are added manually. Can someone point me to the > location where they are added as the comment doesn't reference a > where or how? the register uses are added by the function X86TargetLowering::LowerCall() during the DAG Lowering phase. This is the relevant code segment: // Add

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:04 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > > On 18 March 2020 at 19:19, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > | AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package > | libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary > > What makes you think that? AFAIK --as-cran just sets a bunch of the (nearly

Full_Name: Jim Brown Version: 2.6.0 / 2.6.1 OS: Solaris 10 (SPARC) Submission from: (NULL) (35.8.15.102) I have been able to successfully compile version 2.5.1 using the Sun Studio 12 compilers on Sun Solaris 10 (SPARC). All tests using "make check" pass with a status of OK. However, the following section of "reg-tests-1.R" fails when I attempt to test after a build of

Hi, Just a couple tips to reduce complexity. First, I think you'd get a good speedup by enabling the PRECISION16 switch (if it's not done already). This (very) slightly reduces quality, but means you convert a lot of "emulated" 16x32 multiplications into 16x16. There are also several routines that would benefit from platform-specific optimizations. There are already

On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > >> >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >> >>> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >>>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >>>> copy two files

Hi all, For some time I noticed that my rsync server is not showing a colorfull MOTD... Researching a bit, it turns out to be a problem since rsync-2.6.7 (rsync-2.6.6 is OK). Looking at the NEWS: - The way rsync escapes unreadable characters has changed. First, rsync now has support for recognizing valid multibyte character sequences in your current locale, allowing it to