similar to: FireWall Effects on Samba (Newbie)

All~ I recently started coding an SFTP client in Qt, since i noticed their seemed to be a lack of one with a gui for really any platform that didn't cost money. I wrote most of the FTP portion, and then I decided to begin working on the SFTP part. I couldn't really find documentation for an sshlib to use for developing this portion of my program. Sorry if i'm sending this email to

I've just tried setting up a Shrike (9) version of Redhat. Using the medium settings of lokkit, then adding manually accept commands for ports 137/udp 138/udp, 139/tcp and 445/tcp, I thought I should have been ready to go. This isn't the case, however. I know it's not the smb.conf settup because when I kill iptables samba works. When iptables IS running however, it will respond

* distro: ubuntu breezy ( 6.06 ) * samba version: shipped version with updates ( 3.0.22-1ubuntu3.1 ) * no ssl * openLDAP is running on the same machine as samba, and referenced as localhost/127.0.0.1 where applicable ( 2.2.26-5ubuntu2.1 ) * nscd is not installed, much less running I've set up a samba pdc with ldap by following the Samba Guide very closely, adapting it to Ubuntu/Debian where

ok, i've been buggering on and off with this for way too long now. I'm just plain stuck. The objective is to get full authentication working for a samba machine by integrating it into and existing AD system as a member server. The domain is windows 2003, in native mode. There are two domain controllers. The samba box is running debian sarge, using only the official sarge packages.

I have two different systems (on different networks) showing this behavior. Both are running Ubuntu Dapper/606.1 LTS with samba version 3.0.22 and windows 2003 sp1 servers (not R2). AD integration is done via winbind, with nss using winbind. At some point in time (which is unknown to me), the samba server stopped seeing new users, groups, machines which are added to AD. scenario: I add a new

I have a little home network with one Windows 98 PC and a pc running linux. My idea is that as soon as DSL is finally made available to my area (which I keep getting told will be real soon now) I want to route it through the linux box and up to the Windows PC, using IP masquerading, etc. At present I have samba enabled on the unix box which opens up several worthwhile conveniences to me:

Hi Tinc Mailing-Group, I am a bit stuck with firewalling rules at the moment. Maybe someone could please advise me a good rc.firewall script to use on my setup. If anyone runs an ipchains firewall script on their linux box which is ALSO running tinc, could they please mail it to me, for my perusal. I have tinc pre3 set up and working on my systems, however I can only get it to work if I set the

I have tried to replace these lines from ipchains to work with shorewall. # /NFS requires 111/tcp (sunrpc/portmapper) and *all* UDP ports./ # ipchains -A input -p tcp -s $SUBNET -i eth0 -d 0/0 111 -j ACCEPT ipchains -A input -p udp -s $SUBNET -i eth0 -d 0/0 -j ACCEPT # /These ports are required by bootp, tftpd, and PXE./ # /There are also a handful of udp ports that need to/ # /be open,

Hi all! I try to make port based routing, because a have two connections to the internet. My router is a "one disk floppy router for linux". It is a big router project www.fli4l.de. I try also to make a opt, it is like a plugin for this router. This project uses Kernel 2.2.19 compiled with libc5 (because it is small and you can use one floppy disk). At the moment, iproute2 is not

Hi List, I am not familiar with the commands of IPtables so I want use tools on top of it. What do you suggest. Can I make test of it inside CentOS on top of VMWare server with only one LAN inteface? I try to use Pfsense, I believe it has easy to understand GUI but it fails to install on my desktop machine to test, maybe due to hardware comaptibility. Kernel panic during boot even after disabling

Can anyone tell me what the absolute minimally permissive ipchains rule would be to allow tinc to operate correctly between two hosts. If we were to presume each tinc host had a default-deny policy, what ipchains command(s) would allow tinc to do its thing? I've scanned the docs on the tinc site and not found the answer- sorry if I'm blind or dumb. Thanks, Patrick - Tinc:

Hi All, I am new to CentOS and I signed up for a Mosso Cloud Server that runs Cent OS 5.2 I can ssh in. I ran: yum install vnc vnc-server then: vncserver (and set desktop viewing password) But I cannot connect. How do I add 5900 to the centos firewall? How do I edit the conf file? I only have SSH ability at this point... -jason

I have a couple questions that I will submit separately. When I have IPchains running I can't get my samba box to show up in network neighborhood, but when I turn ipchains off the box shows up. What rules do I need to add for things to work properly? -- Raymond Norton Little Crow Telemedia Network 320-234-0270

Hi All, very new to the linux thing. I have tried our local linux list but no luck. I have setup Samba on the box which is running Rh7.3 with Samba 2.2.3a-6 (server/common & client) I got a tut from IBMs site on how to setup a pdc with samba and redhat. I followed the tut step for step but still when I want to login on wind98 onto the box I get a message that the pdc is not found. When I

Hi ; MY script: tc-htb3 qdisc del dev eth2 root ipchains -F tc-htb3 qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 10: htb default 20 r2q 40 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 50Mbit burst 2000 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10:1 classid 10:100 htb rate 12mbit ceil 50mbit prio 1 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10:1 classid 10:20 htb rate 38mbit ceil 50Mbit prio 8 ipchains

Hi! I just recently entered the wonderful world of the so called "advanced routing" and decided to try and limit the bandwidth of a MASQed network here and ended up in trouble :(. The setup is (as far as I can tell) pretty straightforward. eth0 is connected to the "real" network with a proper IP, and eth2 is 192.168.10.x (the MASQed network). All of it is basicly right out of

Hi there. I''ve two Internet connections at the same box, one connection is made through ADSL, and another is made with a Radio-Link (WaveLAN IE822). I wan''t to do a backup connection with the ADSL link. With what tools I can do this? ipchains, iptables, a third party tool? -- ____________________________________________________________ PIII 500MHz - 98MB RAM -

Hi guys, I was thinking aboiut this for a while: If I have nested resource routes, for example /building/1/floor/2/ room/ 3 (building has_many floors and so on), I have to call the room_path method like this: room_path @room.floor.building, @room.floor, @room Isn´t there a better way to handle nested routes with foreign keys, or can I have this method overwritten somewhere? Greets Jonas

Hi. I''ve got here the following configuration: (turn on fixed pitch font to be able to see the scheme in a more accurately way) Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.0.0/24) (192.168.0.229) NAT Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.1.0/24) (192.168.1.229) NAT [if doesn''t really

I'm just about to give up in despair of getting Samba working on my network. I've browsed through several books, HOWTOs and websites and still can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Before I quit, could someone double check this and maybe spot what I've missed? First, let me describe my network. Names and IP addresses have been changed to protect the innocent. :-)