similar to: ext3 updates for 2.4.20

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "ext3 updates for 2.4.20"

2002 Dec 06
2
[patch] fix the ext3 data=journal unmount bug
This patch fixes the data loss which can occur when unmounting a data=journal ext3 filesystem. The core problem is that the VFS doesn't tell the filesystem enough about what is happening. ext3 _needs_ to know the difference between regular memory-cleansing writeback and sync-for-data-integrity purposes. (These two operations are really quite distinct, and the kernel has got it wrong for
2002 Dec 15
2
problem with Andrew's patch ext3
Hello Andrew, I patched 2.4.20 with your patch found out on http://lwn.net/Articles/17447/ and I have a big problem with: once server is booted on 2.4.20 with your patch, when I want to reboot with /sbin/reboot, server makes a Segmentation fault and it crashs. I tested it on 50-60 servers and it is the same problem. I tested kernel 2.4.20 without your patch: no problem. # uname -a Linux XXXXXX
2003 Mar 20
2
[Patch] ext3_journal_stop inode access
Hi Andrew, The patch below addresses the problem we were talking about earlier where ext3_writepage ends up accessing the inode after the page lock has been dropped (and hence at a point where it is possible for the inode to have been reclaimed.) Tested minimally (it builds and boots.) It makes ext3_journal_stop take an sb, not an inode, as its final parameter. It also sets
2012 Apr 26
7
[PATCH 2/4] Btrfs: fix deadlock on sb->s_umount when doing umount
The reason the deadlock is that: Task Btrfs-cleaner umount() down_write(&s->s_umount) sync_filesystem() do auto-defragment and produce lots of dirty pages close_ctree() wait for the end of btrfs-cleaner start_transaction reserve space shrink_delalloc() writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle()
2003 Apr 30
1
ext3 and data=journal bug
Greetings all, I have a question regarding the fsync data corruption bug that was introduced in 2.4.20 when using data=journal. I have patched the 2.4.20 kernel with the 3 sync patches available from zip.com.au, and I am wondering if with these patches the "bug" still exists: sync_fs.patch sync_fs-fix.patch sync_fs-fix-2.patch In addition the following two patches have also
2003 Apr 08
2
nasty ext3 problem
Using kernel 2.4.20 with the following patches ext3-scheduling-storm.patch ext3-use-after-free.patch sync_fs-fix-2.patch sync_fs-fix.patch sync_fs.patch Note: this problem started happening before applying the patches I have a small partition for / since I don't have much there. Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 303344 98934
2008 Feb 22
1
[PATCH] IGET: Remove initialisation of read_inode() super op from BTRFS
Remove the initialisation of read_inode() super op from BTRFS as it has been dropped. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index a46300c..612a34f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @@ -462,7 +462,6 @@ static struct
2004 Sep 04
0
[PATCH] remove ocfs_put_inode
this doesn't do anything but noisy debug printks anymore Index: src/super.c =================================================================== --- src/super.c (revision 1426) +++ src/super.c (working copy) @@ -196,9 +196,7 @@ static struct super_operations ocfs_sops = { .statfs = ocfs_statfs, - .put_inode = ocfs_put_inode, .clear_inode = ocfs_clear_inode, - //put_inode =
2008 Dec 22
56
[git patches] Ocfs2 patches for merge window, batch 2/3
Hi, This is the second batch of Ocfs2 patches intended for the merge window. The 1st batch were sent out previously: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/19/280 The bulk of this set is comprised of Jan Kara's patches to add quota support to Ocfs2. Many of the quota patches are to generic code, which I carried to make merging of the Ocfs2 support easier. All of the non-ocfs2 patches should have
2009 Jan 24
2
[PATCH] btrfs: flushoncommit mount option
Hi Chris- Here''s a simpler version of the patch that drops the unrelated sync_fs stuff. thanks- sage The ''flushoncommit'' mount option forces any data dirtied by a write in a prior transaction to commit as part of the current commit. This makes the committed state a fully consistent view of the file system from the application''s perspective (i.e., it
2007 Aug 23
2
give me some works
hello, Chris In the next several months, I will have a lot of spare time. I will be happy if you assign some work to me. I have learn linux kernel for years but only fix a few small bugs in IP stack. In the past few months, I read some EXT4/VFS codes. I began reading source of btrfs ten days ago and have read it twice now. Regards YZ
2009 Jul 20
1
[PATCH] ocfs2: flush dentry lock drop when sync ocfs2 volume.
In commit ea455f8ab68338ba69f5d3362b342c115bea8e13, we move the dentry lock put process into ocfs2_wq. This is OK for most case, but as for umount, it lead to at least 2 bugs. See http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1133 and http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1135. And it happens easily if we have opened a lot of inodes. For 1135, the reason is that during umount will call
2001 Jan 19
2
building ext3 as a module
When trying to build ext3 as a module, I get the follwing errors during the kernel link: /usr/bin/kgcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/brian/src/kernel-2.2.19-pre6mvd/linux-2.2.19pre6-kdb-ext3/include -c -o dummy_sym.o dummy_sym.c ld -m elf_i386 -T /home/brian/src/kernel-2.2.19-pre6mvd/linux-2.2.19pre6-kdb-ext3/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_t ask.o -Map map
2009 Jun 29
1
wine/RosettaStone breakage from recent kernel commit
Hi, I've been running the foreign language training program The Rosetta Stone(TRS) on wine for months now, but a recent commit to the linux kernel has caused TRS to be unable to read the DVD drive, where the program's data files are kept. Strangely, winefile can still read the data DVD, but TRS cannot, and I'm stumped. Below is the guilty kernel commit (rather long, sorry). Can
2012 Jun 26
6
[PATCH] Add a page cache-backed balloon device driver.
This implementation of a virtio balloon driver uses the page cache to "store" pages that have been released to the host. The communication (outside of target counts) is one way--the guest notifies the host when it adds a page to the page cache, allowing the host to madvise(2) with MADV_DONTNEED. Reclaim in the guest is therefore automatic and implicit (via the regular page reclaim).
2012 Jun 26
6
[PATCH] Add a page cache-backed balloon device driver.
This implementation of a virtio balloon driver uses the page cache to "store" pages that have been released to the host. The communication (outside of target counts) is one way--the guest notifies the host when it adds a page to the page cache, allowing the host to madvise(2) with MADV_DONTNEED. Reclaim in the guest is therefore automatic and implicit (via the regular page reclaim).
2011 Nov 09
6
[PATCH 0/5] Btrfs: mount error handling fixes
A bunch of fixes (memory leaks, NULL pointer dereferences and devices hanging in busy state) to sanitize error handling during mount sequence. This is on top of for-linus + slyfox''s double-free fix. Thanks, Ilya Ilya Dryomov (5): Btrfs: fix memory leak in btrfs_parse_early_options() Btrfs: fix subvol_name leak on error in btrfs_mount() Btrfs: avoid null dereference and leaks
2009 Apr 17
26
OCFS2 1.4: Patches backported from mainline
Please review the list of patches being applied to the ocfs2 1.4 tree. All patches list the mainline commit hash. Thanks Sunil
2012 Jul 25
0
No subject
pagecache for pages above lower limit but that is a separate question about driver design, I would like to make sure I understand the high level design first. > > > > Note that users could not care less about how a driver > > is implemented internally. > > > > Is there some workload where you see VM working better with > > this than regular balloon? Any
2012 Jul 25
0
No subject
pagecache for pages above lower limit but that is a separate question about driver design, I would like to make sure I understand the high level design first. > > > > Note that users could not care less about how a driver > > is implemented internally. > > > > Is there some workload where you see VM working better with > > this than regular balloon? Any