similar to: [patch 2.4] Fix ext3 scheduling storm and lockup

Hello! I have some questions about external journals. On a 4 disk software RAID 5 I have two big devices (one 60 GB, one 180 GB). I would like to give each an external journal on a 2 disk software RAID 1 device and use data=journal. The journal will get its own partition with mke2fs -O journal_dev /dev/mdwhatever. The used 6 harddrives are all IDE drives, they are connected through

All, I know that there is no official port to Kernel 2.4.4, thus I may not get any help, however I am hoping someone could point me in the right direction for my problem. I am currently forced to use kernel 2.4.4 for reasons out of my control (embedded board). Here are the exact versions of everything I'm running: ExT3 Version: ext3-2.4-0.9.6-248 Util Version: util-linux-2.11f.tar.bz2 e2fs

Dear XEN-Team I've set up a complete new VM, tested copying and backuping with following error again: [ 1920.052129] INFO: task jbd2/xvda2-8:98 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1920.052143] Not tainted 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 [ 1920.052147] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1920.052153] jbd2/xvda2-8 D ffff880004986e78 0 98

We have DELL 2650 with CENTOS 3.4 installed. Today I saw following messages on /var/log/messages. Anyone know what it mean? Does it point to which disk? =================================== Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel: EXT3-fs unexpected failure: (((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0); Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel: Possible IO failure. Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel:

SYSTEM: rh6x based system, 2.2.19-6.2.7 rh errata kernel + 0.0.7a patch, I rebuilt rpm for i686; celeron466, 64MB, PIIX4. root fs is on software raid1 ext2, 6 additional fs's on software raid1 ext2. There's a 3rd HD, not mirrored, which is mounted ext3. EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. I enabled journal with tune2fs -j with unmounted fs. The 3 HDs are tuned with

checks IO error in ocfs2_get_sector(). this patch is based on Linus' git. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- diff -up ./fs/ocfs2/super.c.orig ./fs/ocfs2/super.c --- ./fs/ocfs2/super.c.orig 2009-02-12 18:05:19.023685000 -0800 +++ ./fs/ocfs2/super.c 2009-02-12 18:07:13.995623000 -0800 @@ -1537,6 +1537,13 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super

checks IO error in ocfs2_get_sector(). this patch is based on 1.4 git. Signed-off-by: Wengang wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- Index: fs/ocfs2/super.c =================================================================== --- fs/ocfs2/super.c (revision 128) +++ fs/ocfs2/super.c (working copy) @@ -1203,6 +1203,12 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super unlock_buffer(*bh);

Hi, I use ext3 over RAID1+0 LUN. When I disconnect my fiber cable to the RAID (in order to force a migration to a failover node) I expect to see I/O errors and then a failure to write/read to the filesystem, but in addition I get an Assertion failure. The end result is of course an unusable system which needs to be rebooted. (I reboot the system via machine_restart which works okay but I guess

Hi, By running some scripts on our target system for a while, I lost all means of access to the system. It seems that the kernel is crashed with the following error message: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:731: "(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0)" Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 We are currently running Linux version

I get 2 rejects applying 2.2.19-ext3 to latest errata rh 2.2.19 kernel. 1) fs/buffer.c Should I put "J_ASSERT(buf->b_count > 0);" before or after " *(int *)0 = 0;"? ===== ext3 0.0.7a patch --- 934,946 ---- if (buf->b_count) { buf->b_count--; + if (!buf->b_count && + (buf->b_jlist != BJ_None && buf->b_jlist

Hello. I can't find a gsm plugin for XMMS. How do Unix, Linux, BSD users listen to gsm samples ? Regards...Martin -- While you don't greatly need the outside world, it's still very reassuring to know that it's still there.

Hi all (and developers in particular) I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the subject, and ends with: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the

checks IO error in ocfs2_get_sector(). this patch is based on 1.4 git. Signed-off-by: Wengang wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- Index: fs/ocfs2/super.c =================================================================== --- fs/ocfs2/super.c (revision 128) +++ fs/ocfs2/super.c (working copy) @@ -1203,6 +1203,11 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super unlock_buffer(*bh);

Hi Stephen, I found a bug in JBD routine journal_create() in kernel 2.6, when I debug the OCFS v2 driver. mark_buffer_dirty() reports buffer_head is not uptodate. See following bug description. ------------------------------------------------------- OS: Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Plarform: IA32 Steps: 1. Build the ocfs v2 driver under kernel 2.6. 2. insert ocfs2.ko into kernel 2.6. 3. mkfs.ocfs2 -F

Yet another one of those "it would make sense it" posts. Currently, create_dev in do_mounts.c simply unlinks the device and recreates it. This doesn't seem right. If /dev/hda3 has already been created, by some early-userspace app (udev), there's no need to unlink or even parse the name again. Now, when talking about simple block devices, this doesn't make much of a

I had the following spat out by syslog on my (2.4.18-pre7-ac3) mailer / web server: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" One of its partitions froze hard--I've rebooted it, and I have an oops which the BUG() triggered which won't decode at the moment, but I'll sort that one out

Hi all, I'm not sure if this is really rsync related so fell free to ignore this message ;) I have to server. The first one is rsync server et and the second one the client. The rsync server repo is around 325Go. Every time my client start rsync, both rsyncd on the server and rsync on the client entered "Uninterruptible sleep" state and I can't figure out why. Server : -

Hello all, I am trying to integerate 0.0.6b with our kernel RPM here and have come across an interesting conflict. I want to include the raid patch that Red Hat includes in their kernel but that patch includes the following hunk: --- linux/include/linux/fs.h.orig Tue Jan 16 13:30:09 2001 +++ linux/include/linux/fs.h Tue Jan 16 13:47:18 2001 @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ #define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the

Back again with another oops, which looks suspiciously similiar to the one i posted some days ago (https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2002-May/003587.html). Jun 11 12:11:30 castor kernel: Assertion failure in journal_write_metadata_buffer() at journal.c:406: "buffer_jdirty(jh2bh(jh_in))" ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.18-4custom. Options used -V (default) -k

Hello All, I am running Redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7-10 on a Dual CPU, 2 GB RAM machine. I am running Sendmail , Cyrus IMAP and Ldap on the machine After few hours I get the following error in the syslog error file Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:606: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" May 26 17:29:37 netserv kernel: kernel