similar to: Basic SAMBA configuration help

I have joined my w2k client to workgroup_name, however I cannot see my samba server at all. If I try and view it via 'Computers Near Me' I get a error window stating: 'Workgroup_name is not accessible.' 'The account is not authorized to log in from this station.' I get the same error if I try this as the w2k administrator or user account. If i try searching for

I am having a SERIOUS problem with our new 2.2.5 server. In fact I will probably be forced to move to a Windows 2000 Server platform, as the samba server is practically useless. Work on any files on the share cannot be done without major risk of losing data. I get these two errors all day: [2002/09/19 21:04:21, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436) read_data: read failure for 4. Error =

I'm trying to setup a print server for Samba clients to use. I have a HP LaserJet 4 connected to /dev/lp0 and I'm using the LPRng spooling package. Documents printed from Windows clients make it to the printer. However the printed documents, mostly Excel/Word documents, have various abberations on them. Graphical flaws, the text seems fine. In addition I seem to get 2 copies for some

I''d like reviewers for: 6734731 vif-vnic instances can race against each other 6734123 xpvd-event logging is dismal The webrev is at http://dme.org/solaris/webrev/xvm-script-cleanup.

We see absolutely dismal performance from Canberra to Perth via Aarnet or Grangenet (gig connections across the country). With standard rsync on a tuned tcp stack, we see about 700k/s. I started playing with the --sockopts and have increased the performance to 1.4M/s which is better, but still way off the pace. There are similar patches for ssh at

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:23:01PM -0500, Russell R Poyner wrote: > One more data point for comparison > > I installed the stock samba 4.2 rpm on a centos 7 machine and ran > the same diskspd tests against a share configured with: > vfs objects = aio_pthread > aio read size = 1024 > aio read size = 1024 > > smb2 leases = yes > > I get 27MB/s with 4k

Am 21.07.2016 um 20:56 schrieb Russell R Poyner: > Jeremy, > > I think this is exactly a complex interaction between FreeBSD and > Samba. Best guess would be some system call that is fast in linux but > slow in FreeBSD holding things back. > > Russ > > On 07/21/2016 01:00 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:23:01PM -0500, Russell R Poyner

Am I correct to understand from the previous discussions on this topic (a few years back) that if I have a matrix with missing values my PCA options seem dismal if: (1) I don’t want to impute the missing values. (2) I don’t want to completely remove cases with missing values. (3) I do cov() with use=”pairwise.complete.obs”, as this produces negative eigenvalues (which it has in

Hi all, I am new to this list and I am not an expert, so please be patient with me :-) I am trying to make a samba share working, between a samba standalone server v.4.5.10 (Fedora 25) and a winXP SP3 client. The share should be writable by an authenticated user. The share used to work fine in the past, but upgrading to 4.5.10 (presumably from 4.4.14, on Fedora 24) broke something. At the

Hi, I''m seeing what can only be described as dismal striped write performance from lustre 1.6.3 clients :-/ 1.6.2 and 1.6.1 clients are fine. 1.6.4rc3 clients (from cvs a couple of days ago) are also terrible. the below shows that the OS (centos4.5/5) or fabric (gigE/IB) or lustre version on the servers doesn''t matter - the problem is with the 1.6.3 and 1.6.4rc3 client kernels

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 16:25:14 +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:18:42AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >As people may know, we frequently encounter errors caused by libvirt > >when running the libguestfs appliance. > > > >I wanted to find out exactly how frequently these happen and classify > >the errors, so I ran the

As people may know, we frequently encounter errors caused by libvirt when running the libguestfs appliance. I wanted to find out exactly how frequently these happen and classify the errors, so I ran the 'virt-df' tool overnight 1700 times. This tool runs several parallel qemu:///session libvirt connections both creating a short-lived appliance guest. Note that I have added Cole's

I upped 1.0.4 of the script.. I added checks if no DC's are found, error message and exits script, so no python errors anymore, if i did it right. ;-) on both DC's do the following. and whats the output of : cat /etc/hosts cat /etc/resolv.conf and kinit Administrator SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` SETHOSTNAME=`hostname -s` SERVER_IP_ADRESS=`hostname -i` echo "Test domainname:

I hope somebody can help me with this. I posed this question a week ago and got several well-meaning answers that were not very helpful. I have 10 Windows XP workstations and 100 users. Each of the 100 users has an account on my Samba server (running Samba 3.03 on Mandrake Linux 10). Each user has several shares on the Samba server which are unique to that user. In other words, only THAT

Hello all, I recently purchased a Cisco 7940 IP phone to do some testing with (to validate a migration to asterisk for our internal PBX needs). I understand that I need to update the phone for it to support SIP, so I configured the phone with an IP address and pointed it at my tftp server. When I reboot the phone I am currently getting "TFTP File Not Found SEPDefault.cnf" in the

Hi, I'm currently fiddling with Samba, trying to make it work on CentOS 7. Before that, I ran Samba successfully in a mixed environment with Slackware64 14.1 on the server and Slackware/Windows Seven on the client side. I have three sandbox machines running CentOS 7. One has a minimal install with only the samba and samba-client packages. Just to be on the safe side for fiddling,

One of my customers handed me a copy of this paper and asked why are we using xen if it is so slow... http://morse.colorado.edu/~tlen5710/12s/VMware.pdf which is a fairly damning report of performance under Xen in comparison to VMWare, citing worse than 50% overhead of Xen in comparison to physical. Has anyone seen this paper before? James

I have been using a laptop computer of Pentium III 1.13 Ghz. I heard that AMD's Athlon has excellent floating point capacity. So I bought a Athlon 2200+ laptop yesterday. I expected that new Athlon 2200+ will be twice as fast as the P III 1.13 GB. I ran a R simulation program and the new computer is only 30% faster, in fact slightly slower than a Celeron 1.50 GB laptop. I am very disappointed

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:42:53PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:49:09PM -0500, Russell R Poyner wrote: > > I'm tuning a samba 4.3 install on freebsd and I'm confused about aio > > settings. > > > > I've loaded the freebsd aio kernel module and tried various values > > or aio read size and aio write size, but it seems to

hi smbusers, would like to ask some questions about posix acls and reiserfs.help and info is much appreciated.(to make it clear i am running mandriva 2007 free edition with samba 3.0.23d installed.) 1. is acl supported now on reiserfs filesystems by default? 2. do i have to recompile the kernel and apply the acl patch? (i currently have the 2.6.17 kernel) 3.which is best for samba?xfs?ext3? or