similar to: ext3 + quota + rh7.3

Good evening. We have some heavy-loaded servers on ext2, and we want to migrate to ext3fs. But we need full and stable quota support. I have headrd that there are some problems in quota usage under ext3fs. Is it true? Should we decline the ext3 usage as impossible in our servers? We need high-level stability in our server (hosting). Thanks before. -- Best regards,

Hi, I'm having what looks like a deadlock using kernel 2.4.18 + ext3 + quota on a pretty loaded system. meanwhile, i moved back to ext2 again. I'm using mount-2.11g and Quota utilities version 3.05 (I also tried with 3.06). I also tried with kernel 2.4.16 just in case, but the problem exists anyway. Anything I can do? JP

hi guys, I have an asterisk server and a mediatrix 1204 gateway. I make calls through the mediatrix unit (only outgoing calls). The problem is, every call I make through the mediatrix unit is logged in the cdr as 'ANSWERED', even if the call was 'NO ANSWER' in practice. Any ideas how to make cdr records accurate? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi Folks, I have an internal HDD running under RH7.3. I would like to purchse a second HDD(usb external) of same geometry, and use it as a bootable snapshot of the first internal HDD. I wish to make a whole disk bootable backup regularly via this method. Is this feasible ? How should I approach this ? Any advice and/or documentations are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. karhong. --

Hi All Guys, I just join this list I am going to experiment a crossover connection between a WinME box and a RH7.3 Box. The setting of WinME is without problem. It can communicate with another WinME box or a WinXP box with crossover connection. I don't use password to login in both boxes I have Samba-2.2.3a running on a RH7.3 box #service smb start/stop Everything OK without complaint

Hi, We have a couple of RH7.3 systems. Both have samba installed and they were running well before. Now, one system's samba shows a problem after the system rebooting yesterday. Samba is still running and all windows 95, 98 users can access this RH7.3 system without any problem, but windows NT/2000/XP users cannot access it now. Before the rebooting, all windows (including nt/2k/xp)

hi, I was trying to use ext3 with quota and 2.4.18, but when the system had sustained load, eventually the system fell on deadlock. By that time, I was told to use the latest -ac patch, and maybe the problem would no longer exist. But instead I went back to ext2 and waited for 2.4.19 to come out. Now I tryed 2.4.19 with ext3 and all the same thing, but the system hanged up again. Please tell

Hi ! My system is RH7.2 with Adaptec/DPT/I2O drivers (http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/dpt/). There is a 2 disk RAID 1 array which had no disk fail. Several partition on it: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 1.9G 435M 1.4G 24% / /dev/sda2 13G 3.2G 9.1G 26% /home none 504M 0 503M 0% /dev/shm At this time, all

I have been working with samba trying to get PDC functionality out of it. I tried first - version 3 from samba.org then I tried the samba that comes with rh7.3 and the last version I have been trying to get to work is the latest samba-tng. It has been straight forward getting file sharing to work, but the PDC part just won't work. I can manaully create a machine account on the linux box

Hi all, I finally got some info on this problem that you guys might have and not even know about! So check this out. -Steve ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:59:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Urban Widmark <> To: woodbri@swoodbridge.com Copies to: Ed McNierney <> Subject: Re: SMBFS missing files using ls and

Hi, I have a server that have an aplication that runs on RH7.3 and in Centos 2.1 Currently, it runs RH7.3 with yum updates from fedora-legacy My question is, should I update to Centos 2.1 or stay in RH7.3? What are my advantages of migrating to Centos 2.1? My concern are more about security updates in the next 2 years. Many thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. <oliver at samera.com.py>

Hi all, I can see the RH7.3 linux box I've configured with the latest Redhat RPM samba package in the Windows 2000 network neighbourhood, but when I double click the W2000 computer icon I get the message "\\Linuxbox is not accessible, The network path was not found." The network is a small switched lan, sadly with only one unix box (RH7.3) and a mixture of Windows2000 and 98

Sirs, We've just successfully upgraded our samba server from 2.0 to 3.0. Access from windows clients and linux clients particularly RH7.3 and RH9.0 has no problem accessing the files and saving them. Unfortunately, we also have Mandrake and Knoppix workstations and in which we're having problems on the mounting of the samba shares. Mandrake and Knoppix basically uses the original

Dear List, I hope someone could give me some explanation about above error/problem I got. I have 2 machines, one installed RH7.3 (IP ADDR. =10.1.45.12, host name = fk0000-msi-srv) and the other one, Mandrake8.2. (IP ADDR. = 10.1.45.13) Both machines use Samba 2.2.3a. At the RH7.3, I got following error if I connect from Mandrake8.2. $ smbclient -U% -L 10.1.45.12 added interface ip=10.1.45.13

Hi, RH7.3, Samba 2.2.8a, Win2KSP4 clients... I was just wondering, I know I can have a logon script based on a machine name, on a group, a username, etc., but am I able to actually have a combination of the above? I would like to have a standard group logon script (which I currently do have), but I would also like an extra script to run if they log on to particular machines under my domain...

Apologies if there is a cleanly written and searchable FAQ that I could be directed to. I have no problem to RTFM if I can find the FM... Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... BTW, where would I find a useful FM? David -- David J. Sussman, MBA email:

Well, I've asked a couple times already but I will ask one more, since I still havent' managed to get any further. We have several sites. Each site has it's own network and domain. We are connected via a WAN. Is the best practice to have one WINS server for each site? Or is a single WINS server for the WAN the way to go? Right now I have a single WINS server for the WAN. I CAN NOT

Hey all. I've got four computers in a small network (Actually more, but keeping it simple to get to the point) 1> Linux Server (RH7.3) Running Samba (Default version with RH7.3) 2> Windows 2000 Workstation 3> Windows XP Pro. 4> Windows 98SE All of the windows boxes can connect, without problems, to the SAMBA server, and all the shares. No problems

Hi I have some odd problem with running dovecot. Program dies with message in maillog: Mar 31 21:04:02 test-box dovecot: Dovecot starting up Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: execv(imap-login) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: execv(imap-login) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: Login process died too early -

You folks are the greatest. Rolled out my first Samba "member server" today. Read the stuff from SWAT, and it worked the first time on RH7.3, after it failed on RH8 You folks are the best, we're struggling to stay afloat and M$ squeezes us for more. (RH is pushing me to Debian by the day!!!) There will be a lot more Samba in the farm soon. My deepest grattitude. Respectully,