similar to: Win2k explorer.exe dies when dealing with printers

Hi. Samba 2.2.8. I have installed the drivers on the print$ share. The smb.conf looks like this: [printers] print ok = yes guest ok = yes printcap name = /etc/printcap print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P%p -r %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold %p %j

Samba 2.2.8 + cups-1.1.17. load printers = yes show add printer wizard = yes printcap name = cups printer admin = root printing = cups [print$] path = /home/printers guest ok = yes browseable = yes write list = root [printers] comment = All Printers printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes public = yes read only

$TC filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 5 protocol ip u32 $TC filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 5 handle 2: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 for ((j=0; j<=7; j++)) do for ((i=0; i<=255; i++)) do q=`printf "%x\n" $i` $TC filter add dev imq0 protocol ip parent 1:0 u32 ht 2:$q: match ip src 10.0.$j.$i flowid 1:10 echo "$q 10.0.${j}.$i" done done $TC

Hi I have an hp1220c printer I'm having problems with also. Which patches are you referring to and where can I get them? Dennis > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:43:17 +0200 >From: "Llu'is Batlle" <lluisbatlle@tavil.net> >To: samba@lists.samba.org >Subject: Re: [Samba] samba-2.2.5-printing.patch > >On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:28:22PM +0200,

On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:46 PM, David Greene wrote: > > + /// circular_raw_ostream - A raw_ostream that saves its output in a > + /// circular buffer. A better description would be "which *can* save its data to a circular buffer, or can pass it through directly to an underlying stream if specified with a buffer of zero." When it is buffering, what causes it to flush? Your

On Friday 18 December 2009 17:27, David Greene wrote: > > Here's the updated patch. > > Well, that didn't go through right. Here it is again. Argh! Stupid bug fixed. :) Index: include/llvm/Support/circular_raw_ostream.h =================================================================== --- include/llvm/Support/circular_raw_ostream.h (revision 0) +++

Hello. I use Linux 2.0.30(Red Hat) and Samba 1.9.16p. Clients are Win95, NT Workstations and Servers. I use Linux like printserver and bridge. And I have problem with my printer HP LaserJet 4MV with JetDirect card. It print 1 test page( or another 1 page) and print after it second page: User: root Host: LINUX Class: LINUX

Hi, I've got two linux machines with the same distribution and samba 3 that cross-mounts a share (i.e., machine a mounts a share of machine b and vice versa). I'm experiencing slow access from the machines to the opposite mounted share and I don't know what this slow performance can be due to. I'm not running with oplocks cause the share is accessed only by the other linux

On Friday 18 December 2009 13:56, David Greene wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2009 13:53, David Greene wrote: > > > > + void releaseStream() { > > > > + // Delete the stream if needed. Otherwise, transfer the buffer > > > > + // settings from this raw_ostream back to the underlying > > > > stream. + if (!TheStream) > > >

I have Samba 2.2.7 running on Redhat 8 (fully updated). I have two printers set up - a laser and a Deskjet 920C both connected to the Redhat server via USB cables. Printing is managed using CUPS although I get the same problem with LPR and Webmin configured printers. The laser works fine, the deskjet doesn't. The deskjet works with a generic windows HP Deskjet or HP Deskjet plus driver in

I am trying to build a firewall and from my reading of the list archives and other places, I''m worried about unintended interactions between iptables and iproute2. Here is my situation I have an internal network on eth0 and two separate dmzs on eth1 and eth2 respectively (a wireless network and a kiosk). On the outbound side, I have a cablemodem provider and a dsl provider. What I

On Friday 18 December 2009 17:22, David Greene wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2009 13:56, David Greene wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2009 13:53, David Greene wrote: > > > > > + void releaseStream() { > > > > > + // Delete the stream if needed. Otherwise, transfer the > > > > > buffer + // settings from this raw_ostream back to

Ooops, I guess a suject will get some of you to read this, hey? Hi All, Wondering if there is a document that tells how to get wine printing through a cups printer working? Yes I know the wine docs say it's all magic and if you're using cups your printing will magically work, but for some reason, it doesn't, my wine session crashes and burns when I try to print from the built in

RH 7.2 (LPRng) samba installed from 2.2.5-1 rpm with the following patches from http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/patches/jerry/post-2.2.5/: Makefile.in.patch addform.diff ldap_start_tls.patch parse_sec.patch srv_spoolss_nt.patch security=domain (using winbind), authenticate against windows pdc and use windows wins server. What I do: Connect to \\share-name from w2k pro as printer admin,

On Wednesday 16 December 2009 13:35, David Greene wrote: > > Please make BufferSize an 'unsigned' and default it to 8192. Please use > > PRESERVE_STREAM instead of 'false'. Here's an updated version of the circular buffer. Ok to check in? -Dave Index: include/llvm/Support/circular_raw_ostream.h

On Friday 18 December 2009 19:47, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:46 PM, David Greene wrote: > > + /// circular_raw_ostream - A raw_ostream that saves its output in a > > + /// circular buffer. > > A better description would be "which *can* save its data to a circular > buffer, or can pass it through directly to an underlying stream if > specified

I have Samba 2.0.6.3 (or is it 6.5?) running on a SuSE 6.2 system. I currently have three Windows 95/98 clients attached to my linux machine, which is a firewall/gateway to the internet via cable modem. When I was using Samba 1.-something, I was able to print to the printer on the linux box from two of the three Windows 95 machines on the network. Since I upgraded to 2.0.6, I haven't been

On Friday 18 December 2009 13:53, David Greene wrote: > > > + void releaseStream() { > > > + // Delete the stream if needed. Otherwise, transfer the buffer > > > + // settings from this raw_ostream back to the underlying stream. > > > + if (!TheStream) > > > + return; > > > + if (DeleteStream) > > > +

On Wednesday 16 December 2009 13:19, Chris Lattner wrote: > + int BufferSize; > + std::vector<char> BufferArray; > + bool DelayOutput; > + std::vector<char>::iterator Cur; > > Please doxygenify these. Ok. > Instead of using a std::vector for BufferArray, please just new[] an array > since it is fixed size. Ok. > Why is BufferSize needed with

On Friday 18 December 2009 12:28, Chris Lattner wrote: > This is looking a lot better, here are some more comments: > > + /// current_pos - Return the current position within the stream, > > + /// not counting the bytes currently in the buffer. > > + virtual uint64_t current_pos() { > > I didn't notice this earlier, but is there any reason for current_pos