similar to: Changing file & folder permissions

On 11/28/19 11:13 AM, Kumar, Arjit (SSTO) via samba wrote: > I am able to re-produce the same behavior with samba 4.10.0 on Ubuntu 1904 as it was on hp-ux with samba 4.9.0. > > Scenario:- > 1. Configure samba as PDC and start smbd and nmbd daemons. > 2. Map samba share on 2 Windows PC#1 and PC#2 with same credentials created by pdbedit -a command > 3. Windows

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Gianluca Calloni wrote: > But i need to know if is possible for user_a at mydomain.com to share only 1 or > 2 subfolder (E.g. .INBOX.FOLDER_A and .INBOX.FOLDER_B shared, > .INBOX_FOLDER_C not shared) What's the dovecot-acl in .INBOX and the three directories mentioned above? Or: doveadm acl get -u user_a at

HI Steffen. In folder /var/vmail/example.com/user_a i've a dovecot-acl file with " user=test at example.com lrwstipekxa " IN mysql table user_shares i set: +---------------------+------------------+-------+ | from_user | to_user | dummy | +---------------------+------------------+-------+ | user_a at example.com | test at example.com | 1 |

hi everybody this happens when a Domain Admin adds a user-permission set via properties/security in Windows folder_A was created by a Domain Admin new permission - Modify - was added over the folder_A to the user_A user_A created a file_A.txt in folder_A now Domain Admin goes back to the properties of folder_A wanting to change/modify security entries operation fails on windows: "An

Hi to all. First of all.. I'm new on the mailing list.. So.. Sorry in advance for any mistake or error on posting here.. The question (or doubt..) is about sharing mail folder. I use a test mail server. Is not the production server (always dovecot + postfix + spamassassin + clamav) Well.. In test mail server i can use the share folder, follow the conf istruction on wiki dovecot.

I have a small rails system I am building. Part of the code allow uploading files in to RailsRoot/public/files folder I am running this system is several places that have different domain and folder combinations. cases: 1) domain1.com/folder_a # where folder_a is a symbolic link from Apache document root to the public folder of rails app 2) domain2.com/folder_b/public # where folder_b is

On 12/5/19 9:58 AM, Kumar, Arjit (SSTO) wrote: >> yes, probably works as designed. > I have enabled "strict rename" also but the behavior is still same. > As some time \FOLDER_A\FOLDER_B gets deleted but not \FOLDER_A, while sometime both \FOLDER_A and , \FOLDER_A\FOLDER_B got deleted. > Behavior is not consistent in this scenario. > Which one of above is expected

Dear all is it possible to rsync in a master-slave scenario saving to slave gzip content? i'm not talking about compression during transfer, i'm talking about -saving- the destination in a compressed format. Example: FROM: -folder_A --file_A --file_B TO: -folder_A --file_A.gz --file_B.gz I know that this won't be a "real" rsync between two folder, but it will be an

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Gianluca Calloni wrote: > In folder /var/vmail/example.com/user_a i've a dovecot-acl file with " > user=test at example.com lrwstipekxa " > > IN mysql table user_shares i set: > > +---------------------+------------------+-------+ > | from_user | to_user | dummy | >

Hi, Thanks for your reply. >> yes, probably works as designed. I have enabled "strict rename" also but the behavior is still same. As some time \FOLDER_A\FOLDER_B gets deleted but not \FOLDER_A, while sometime both \FOLDER_A and , \FOLDER_A\FOLDER_B got deleted. Behavior is not consistent in this scenario. Which one of above is expected behavior by design ? -----Original

Hi Rowland, Below is my smb.conf [global] preferred master = yes local master = yes domain master = yes domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes password server = * security = user netbios name = daytona workgroup = daytonadom server string = Samba Server log file = /var/opt/samba/log.%m log level = 10 max log size = 10000 wins support = yes dns

Hello, i hope u guys can help me. This is the first time I write to the list. Sorry about my english... i got a solaris 10 machine and installed "samba 3.0.2.3c" with "openldap 2.3.2.1" , "openssl 0.9.8" and "gcc 3.4.6". i configured kerberos and all the other things. all good. i added the samba-server (solaris10) to a active directory domain. with

Hi Team, I have configured samba 4.9.0 as PDC on hp-ux. Scenario:- 1. Configure samba as PDC(smb.conf file is attached) and start smbd and nmbd daemons. 2. Map samba share on 2 Windows PC#1 and PC#2 with same credentials created by pdbedit -a command 3. Windows PC#1 creates two directories, \FOLDER_A\FOLDER_B in the Samba share 4. Change directory to \ 5. Windows

Hi Ralph, >> It depends. :) If user 2 with cwd in folder_b really has a open handle on that dir, then with strict rename enabled I'd expect the client attempting the delete should get a consistent error message. >> I recommend taking a closer look at network traces and code. Please share more details on when the handle will remain open on the directory, and how to verify this

Hi Team, I am able to re-produce the same behavior with samba 4.10.0 on Ubuntu 1904 as it was on hp-ux with samba 4.9.0. Scenario:- 1. Configure samba as PDC and start smbd and nmbd daemons. 2. Map samba share on 2 Windows PC#1 and PC#2 with same credentials created by pdbedit -a command 3. Windows PC#1 creates two directories, \FOLDER_A\FOLDER_B in the Samba share 4.

Hi all, i've got a strange behaviour with a BlackBerry Classic Phone (BBOS 10.3.2.2876) in combination with Dovecot 2.2.13 while trying to fetch mails. Before burying myself into debugging sessions, i try to get an understanding if the following is a Client- or a Server-specific error in the behaviour: CIGA8 UID FETCH 10009:10035 (UID FLAGS) (CHANGEDSINCE NOMODSEQ) CIGA8 BAD Error

I have a Slackware 8.1 with Samba 2.2.4 configured as PDC on my network. I have a Windows95 client (OSR2, USB supplement) that can't get the list of domain users for defining a share, I get the message:"You cannot view the list of users at this time. Please again later" Windows98 clients can get the list of users on the domain with no problem, also WindowsNT workstations get the

Hi, First of all, thx for fast answering. > I hope that the above commands are really right, because you said folder_a but the name of the folder is "folderA". Sorry, the commands are right :) > The all other things include the groupmaps? What do you mean... when i uses the command "./net groupmap list", i get the following back

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38627 Summary: Changing monitor resolution causes screen corruption Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:41:38PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > The "make check" produced: > === Summary === > > # of expected passes 2209 > # of unexpected failures 41 > # of expected failures 5 > gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/emil/ll/objdir-llvm/test' > gmake: ***