similar to: Problem: I want solid help on how to undelete files in ext3 fs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Problem: I want solid help on how to undelete files in ext3 fs"

2013 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] Error building compiler-rt
yes I think that is correct. I wrote a simple program to print if sizeof(uintptr_t) != sizeof(unsigned char *) and when I compile with gcc -m64 and execute it on a 64-bit host (that is different from the 32-bit laptop on which I originally compiled the program), it says the sizes are not equal. Thanks Pranav On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:
2013 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] Error building compiler-rt
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Pranav Garg <pranav.garg2107 at gmail.com>wrote: > Dear Alexey, > > Yes I am sure that the llvm, clang and compiler-rt are synced to the same > version. I downloaded them all from git > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#git-mirror > I think I need compiler-rt for my project but I'll verify it again to see > if I can proceed
2013 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] Error building compiler-rt
Dear Alexey, Yes I am sure that the llvm, clang and compiler-rt are synced to the same version. I downloaded them all from git http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#git-mirror I think I need compiler-rt for my project but I'll verify it again to see if I can proceed without it. You are correct that compiler-rt is compiled with the just built clang. The complete command that gives an error
2013 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] Error building compiler-rt
Hi Pranav, On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Pranav Garg <pranav.garg2107 at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I see that ENABLE_WERROR is being set to off (the default value) in the > config.log in the llvm build. However on grepping for WERROR in the > compiler-rt folder I get the following output: > > pranav at pranav:~/smack-project/llvm-3.4/src/projects/compiler-rt$ grep
2003 Apr 25
2
Comments about ext3 FS
After a extensive search about a tool or method to undelete/recover files deleted from a partition whit the ext3 FS, i want to make some comments about the use of this FS. What are the benefits of use the ext3 FS in a system (server, desktop, etc.) if i cant recover files deleted by an intruder if i want need to make forensics; or if i want to recover important files deleted (business, personal
2013 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] Error building compiler-rt
Hi, I see that ENABLE_WERROR is being set to off (the default value) in the config.log in the llvm build. However on grepping for WERROR in the compiler-rt folder I get the following output: pranav at pranav:~/smack-project/llvm-3.4/src/projects/compiler-rt$ grep -Rin WERROR * lib/asan/tests/CMakeLists.txt:38: -Werror lib/asan/asan_malloc_mac.cc:253:// This function is currently unused, and we
2013 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] Error building compiler-rt
You can disable -Werror by adding the cmake flag -DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=OFF, which should let it just ignore that (that's also the default, so you must have turned it on somewhere) On Jul 31, 2013, at 13:09 , Pranav Garg <pranav.garg2107 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to build llvm along with clang and compiler-rt. When I run make, I am getting the following
2013 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] Error building compiler-rt
Hi, I am trying to build llvm along with clang and compiler-rt. When I run make, I am getting the following compilation error (I tried compiling llvm-3.2, which is what I need for my project, but also tried llvm-3.3 and the current llvm source from the git repository). ... COMPILE: clang_linux/full-x86_64/x86_64:
2015 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Improper Function::iterator increment
Input to this pass is the bitcode format of simple code below : int sum_single_loop (int a){ int su = 0, i; for (i=0;i<a;i++) su = su + i; return su; } On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:32 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Pranav Kant <pranav913 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, you mean to say that the
2004 Sep 26
2
low level search for deleted data
Hi everyone, I lost my complete home directory and am facing the problem of retrieving some of the deleted data. I have search the web for this matter, but the only information I found is, that it's not possible for a program to do this and that I have to puzzle the files together by scanning the disk (or disk image) with tools like sleuthkit (www.sleuthkit.org) or lde (lde.sourceforge.net).
2015 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Improper Function::iterator increment
So, you mean to say that the above implementation is correct and should work fine. I initially thought that the above way is not the correct way anymore since 3.5.0 might have changed few things. Anyways here is my dirty code I have written for my research project that I took the above snippet from : https://github.com/pranavk/spatial-computing/blob/master/waves.cpp#L105 On Sun, Feb 8, 2015
2014 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] What is HexagonTargetMachine::addPassesForOptimizations for?
On 4/30/2014 5:24 PM, Craig Topper wrote: > Pranav, can you remove it? > Yes, I'll remove it. Pranav -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
2003 Aug 07
2
Recover data from ext3 filesystem
Hello everyone, I came back from a long vacation the other day to a RH 7.3 system that would not boot. My situation is similar to Eddy's post "Seriously corrupt ext3 root filesystem - help?" from a couple of days ago. I can mount the drive in read-write and read-only modes. I can get into some of the directories and get certain files off of the disk. But, if I try to access a
2014 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] What is HexagonTargetMachine::addPassesForOptimizations for?
On 4/30/2014 2:00 PM, Matthew Curtis wrote: > On 4/30/2014 9:01 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote: >> On 4/30/2014 8:45 AM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola wrote: >>> On 30 April 2014 00:52, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> This function is marked virtual but doesn't override anything, >>>> doesn't have >>>> any overrides, and
2015 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Improper Function::iterator increment
void Wave::init (const Function &F){ Function::const_iterator ie = F.end(); outs() << ie << "\n\n"; for (Function::const_iterator I = F.begin(), IE = F.end(); I != IE; I++, K++){ outs() << I << "\n"; // some manipulation with I } } I used the above shown function in my pass in LLVM 3.4.2 and it used to work fine but
2010 Apr 20
1
[LLVMdev] Debugging using gdb
Hi John, Yes, it was the problem of the namespace. Sorry for bugging for such a silly mistake. Thanks Pranav On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:33 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Pranav Garg wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to debug my llvm pass called -aa-eval-garg11 using gdb. >> However I am not able to establish a breakpoint in any function of
2012 Apr 27
0
[LLVMdev] MemRefs in a Load Instruction
> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Pranav Bhandarkar > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 5:24 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] MemRefs in a Load Instruction > > Hi, > > On the hexagon target, I have written a following combiner pattern. >
2002 Oct 23
1
Undelete for ext3 fs ?
Hi, I undelete an entire directory /var/www/html/* under RH 7.3 under ext3 . Is there an utility to recover the data ? Thanks in advance.
2010 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] Debugging using gdb
Pranav Garg wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to debug my llvm pass called -aa-eval-garg11 using gdb. > However I am not able to establish a breakpoint in any function of my > pass. I have compiled my > pass with a debug build and I have also compiled the input file (using > llvm-gcc) with the -g flag. Given below is the exact output. > > > (gdb) break
2012 Aug 31
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding ReplaceValueWith and ReplaceNodeResults
Hi, I am defining Hexagons version of ReplaceNodeResults to change the a node of the type A: i8 = INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN ... , ... , To B: SIGN_EXTEND (A) After returning from my function, the type legalizer calss ReplaceValuesUsesWith to replace the uses of A with B. Unfortunately, it replaces the use of A in the new node B too. So the node now is B: SIGN_EXTEND(B) , which is clearly bad and the