similar to: Download to ext3 partition stalls (sans HTML crap)

Hi ext3-gurus, I was doing some testing of our 100 Mbit ethernet at work, and found a weird problem which appears to be ext3 releated as far as I can tell. The test is very simple. I use ncftp to connect to another machine running vsftpd and download a very large file over the network. The network is switched, and I get 8-10 MB/s transfers usually. Now, if I download to /dev/null ("get

I'm running RedHat 8.0 with samba-2.2.7-5.8.0 (installed from RedHat distribution) When I use cpio to write a backup (> 2GB) to a smbfs filesystem, I get the error: File size limit exceeded I get the same error when I linux copy (cp) a file (> 2GB) from a Linux ext3 filesystem to the smbfs filesystem. The smbfs filesystem is mounted from a Windows 2000 Professional workstation. After

We have been using ZFS for user home directories for a good while now. When we discovered the problem with full filesystems not allowing deletes over NFS, we became very anxious to fix this; our users fill their quotas on a fairly regular basis, so it''s important that they have a simple recourse to fix this (e.g., rm). I played around with this on my OpenSolaris box at home, read around

Hi, I m facing problem in "rsync" rtelated to the time-stamp of the files. Im using rsync for transfering the file from my m/c (OS :jaluna-linux) to a remote m/c(OS:jaluna-linux) and even if there was no change in the files on my m/c, when i rsync them to remote m/c the time-stamp of the file on remote m/c (which i transfered from my m/c) will change. my file name is bigfile and it is

Helle everyone, Let's say we have 3 servers, 2 of them have the latest (stable) version of rsyncd running (2.6.9) <Server1> ==> I N T E R N E T ==> <Server2 (rsyncd running)> ==> LAN ==> <Server3 (rsyncd running)> Suppose I want to send a big file (bigfile.big) from Server1 to both Server2 and Server3. It would be a good idea to send first from Server1

So this has been bugging me for a few years now and I can always "fix" the problem, but I don't know if that's actually the correct way. So the issue is terminal emulation. I use Secure CRT (vandyke.com) to connect to any and all of my servers through SSH. Whether the terminal is set to 'linux' or 'xterm' makes no difference, I always get this output when I run a

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1558 Summary: Sftp client does not correctly process server response messages after write error Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp

--delete --force Won't Remove Directories With Dotnames rsync 2.6.9 Me, personally, I reckon this to be an irritant ... but perhaps (and having thought about this a bit I decided it's a good chance) this is an intentional and useful behaviour. But it's a nuisance if you call your --partial-dir .partial, as I happen to do, since now if you remove a directory which was aborted in

Hi everybody, the following alway gives me the error "Fehler in if (File$X.Frame.Number[a] + 1 == File$X.Frame.Number[a + 1]) (File$FishNr[a] <- File$FishNr[a - : Fehlender Wert, wo TRUE/FALSE n?tig ist". Maybe its stupid, but i'm not getting why... Maybe someone can help me. Thanks a lot! for (i in unique(BigFile$TrackAll)) { File <-

I want to use --min-size to copy just large files (and their necessary parent directories), but everything I've tried copies *all* the source directories, and creates them empty on the destination even if they don't have any big files in them. I only want the minimal directory hierarchies that contain the big files. This doesn't work: $ rm -rf /tmp/foo $ rsync -ai --min-size

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > Again, no machine on the internal network that my 2 CentOS hosts are > on are connected to the internet. I have no way to download anything., > There is an onerous and protracted process to get files into the > internal network and I will see if I can get netperf in. Right, but do you have

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10336 Summary: Time in file listing with --list-only option is inconsistent whether dst is given or not Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8512 Summary: rsync -a slower than cp -a Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: linux.news at bucksch.org QAContact:

From: Dag Wieers [mailto:dag at wieers.com] > > On Mon, 16 May 2005, Maciej Zenczykowski wrote: > > > > Well, I could, but why would you use ncftp when lftp is actually more > > > feature complete and much better overall. (ncftp is not open source > > > actually). > > > > > > If there's a good reason you might convince me to do the extra

I have a quick question about rsync's writing of files. I have a team of people that all use the host BigServer, which is running rsync as a deamon, as a central place to keep all shared files backed up. The "master copy" for any given file is considered to be the local file that somebody has worked on -- i.e., BigServer is NOT considered the master copy. BigServer is the backup

I just installed CentOS 4.4 on my laptop, having good experience with Debian, Fedora Core 5, and RHEL4. I really like 4.4's overall appearance (meshing of RHEL4 and FC5), but what I have yet to figure out is how to access repositories for applications that are not part of the default install, such as ncftp. I invoked and updated yum, but it had no idea. I would also like to see what

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Again, no machine on the internal network that my 2 CentOS hosts are >>> on are connected to the

Hi, I am running C6.5 64bit on an USB stick connected to a HP DL360G7; It is usually an ESXi host but eg for firmware updates (not available on SPP) I use this local installation. Problem are the lags and unresponsiveness we are seeing for example when running yum update in the installation phase. The whole system stalls but there is no io in vmstat. From what google tells us, this is a

Dear OpenSSH developers, OpenSSH setting non-blocking mode on its standard files creates serious problems. Setting non-blocking mode violates many of the semantics of how files are supposed to behave and most programs (and most, if not all, stdio libraries) are not prepared to deal with it. That wouldn't be a problem except that non-blocking mode is not a property of the file descriptor but

[sorry if this isn't threaded right... I just subscribed] Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > There are two reasons for the reserve. One is to reserve space on the > partition containing /var and /etc for log files, etc. The other is > to avoid the performance degredation when the last 5-10% of the disk > space is used. (BSD actually reserves 10% by default.) Given that > the