Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "wins.dat to DNS"
2007 Sep 14
5
controller.expect_render has me beat!
Hi,
A controller has a method with the following
def update
...
if @config.update_attributes( params[:new_config] )
redirect_to :action => :index
else
* render :action => :edit, :id => params[:id] # this line here*
end
...
end
The example has the following
it ''should render the "edit" config url on an unsuccessful save''
2008 Apr 16
2
QUICK QUESTION: Run a Ruby File inside of Model
Hi,
I''m trying to run a ruby file in lib from inside of a model. How can I
run a ruby file from inside of a model?
In this example, Thing.rb is my model. I''m trying to run do_update.rb.
How can I call this from inside of Thing.rb?
Thing.rb
**********************
def update_things delete_cache
things = Thing.find(:all, :conditions => "updated = false")
###
2008 Jul 07
3
yum-updatesd not working on CentOS 5.2
Dear Srs,
yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5 appears that it's not working on freshly
installed CentOS 5.2, using:
# rpm -qa "yum*"
yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-2.el5
yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5
yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1
yum-fastestmirror-1.1.10-9.el5.centos
I see some bugs ([1], [2] and [3]) in the bug tracker, and more info
related to other distros like Fedora, etc.. with the same problem.
2017 Feb 27
2
errors on rebuild
Hello,
I am trying to rebuild an index of 2+ million documents and have not been successful. I am running
Python 2.7
Django 1.7
Haystack 2.1.1
Xapian 1.2.21
The index rebuild command I’m using is: django-admin.py rebuild_index --noinput --batch-size=100000
The rebuild completes but an immediate xapian-check returns this error:
xapian-check ./archive_index
record:
baseB blocksize=8K
2007 Oct 19
1
Size and performance efficient rewriting of the `dash.test` built-in
== Proposition A. Do not implement `-a' and `-o'. ==
Why.
1. Most of the `test` usage is 2 or 3 arg. ops.
2. Issues (and possible `||', `&&' substitutions), described in [0]
[0] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/utilities/test.html
3. In case of usage of it, `exec /usr/bin/test $args` can be
implemented. Thus, smart users of `-a' and `-o' will
2005 Sep 23
1
Sortable list with Ajax and delete function - working example
Hi.
I read most of the postings here but unfortunately I didin''t found a complete example which could be used. Of cource the ones who are professionals in javascript could implement the missing peaces from the puzzle.
What I''m required to do is a tree (sortable list) where items can also be deleted and at each modification a function (ajax) is called to save the changes. For
2013 Nov 25
2
Samba4 in FreeBSD cannot upgrade dns
Hi, Samba team!
I am trying to install samba4 on FreeBSD 9.2 as a domain DC to join an
existing samba4 domain controller on FreeBSD 9.2.
I followed the instruction of:
Samba4/HOWTO/Join a domain as a DC
Everything is OK until I run the following command:
root at mtm:/var/named/etc/namedb # samba-tool drs showrepl
Default-First-Site-Name\MTM
DSA Options: 0x00000001
DSA object GUID:
2020 Jun 30
3
samab-4.10 nsupdate
I have a dc configured to use the samba internal dns service. The version of
samba I am using is 4.10.15 packaged for FreeBSD. Its build options state
this:
BIND911 : off
BIND916 : off
, , ,
GSSAPI_BUILTIN : on
GSSAPI_MIT : off
LDAP : on
. . .
NSUPDATE : off
My smb4.conf file contains this:
[global]
bind interfaces only = Yes
dns forwarder =
2013 Jan 02
3
Samba ADDS DC krb5 and samba_nsupdate
Hello
I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC.
I want use BIND for dns system.
To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind.
It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record.
If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message:
This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones.
If I remove the DC the dns-names
2019 Jul 31
3
GPO issues - getting SYSVOL cleaned up again
On 31/07/2019 12:04, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote:
> Am 31.07.19 um 12:50 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:
>> On 31/07/2019 11:40, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote:
>>> Am 31.07.19 um 12:32 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:
>>>> On 31/07/2019 11:22, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote:
>>>>> "dc" was the old name a few years ago
2015 Dec 10
2
Authentication to Secondary Domain Controller initially fails when PDC is offline
On 10/12/15 14:00, Ole Traupe wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.12.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Rowland penny:
>> On 10/12/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote:
>>> Is it possible that kdc server is always the SOA, at least if
>>> derived from DNS and not specified *explicitly* in the krb5.conf?
>>>
>>> In my DNS-Manager console I find that
>>>
>>>
2017 Mar 02
2
errors on rebuild
Hi Olly,
Thanks for the detailed response. I hadn’t realized there was a new xapian haystack backend. I’m going to try that but I have some upgrades to do first. Django 1.8, etc.
Thanks,
Ryan
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:29:46AM -0800, Ryan Cross wrote:
>> I am trying to rebuild an index of 2+
2015 Dec 10
4
Authentication to Secondary Domain Controller initially fails when PDC is offline
On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote:
>
>>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just
>>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere.
>>>
>>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there
>>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the
>>> top levels: FQDN
2016 May 04
2
FreeBSD: net/samba43's NSUPDATE
On 05/04/16 20:23, Rowland penny wrote:
(I understand this might be specific to FreeBSD, but I asked on its
mailing list and got no answer...)
>> Then why is it an option *in alternative* to BIND?
>
> What do you mean '*in alternative*' ??
I mean when I build Samba port, I can choose NSUPDATE *or* BIND99 *or*
BIN910 (where "or" means "exclusive or",
2020 Nov 20
2
dnsupdate failed with TKEY is unaceptable
Ah i see..
/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab
Thats the "old" path..
Your using bind9 you should have:
/usr/local/samba/bind-dns/dns.keytab
dont forget to set the needed rights on bind-dns folder.
On road, cant look deeper in it.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Rommel Rodriguez Toirac [mailto:rommelrt at nauta.cu]
> Verzonden:
2019 Aug 12
3
dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable
I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose.
Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable
I already checked what?s listed @
2019 Sep 03
3
Trouble joining DC Bind9_DLZ
On 03/09/2019 10:07, Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Samba 4.10.7 with Bind9_DLZ (9.10.3-P4-Debian), but I'm not
> getting to insert a new DC into the Domain. My SO is a VM Debian 9.9.
>
> Following is the command used and the error:
>
> root at samba4-dc3:/var/lib/samba/private# samba-tool domain join
> empresa.com.br DC -k yes
2016 May 04
2
FreeBSD: net/samba43's NSUPDATE
On 05/03/16 22:55, Rowland penny wrote:
> Don't use freebsd, but Samba 4, when run as an AD DC, uses nsupdate to
> update a computers DNS records in AD.
First off, thanks for answering.
Alas, I don't really understand what you mean...
Is it used to dynamically add A records for clients that connect to the AD?
>> Is it intended to work with BIND (like the other two in
2018 Aug 21
3
Samba 4.8.4 + BIND 9.9.4 - possibility of nonsecure DNS updates
> So you never read this:
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC
> Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named
> 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D
If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made
2015 Nov 16
2
Secure dynamic update failure with internal DNS
2015-11-10 22:07 GMT+08:00 James <lingpanda101 at gmail.com>:
> I't appears all versions of Samba 4.2.X allow secure updates. It's
>> transitioning to any version of Samba 4.3.X that prevents secure
>> updates. Looking at the Wireshark captures of a successful update
>>
>> https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/79e72c42de44
>>
>>