similar to: Freebsd and WinXP

Hello All: I have a situation where I have a Samba box (RH 7.3 w/samba 2.2.4) that I set up for a client. Another consultant came along and installed a VPN using SonicWalls between the main site and a remote site. So now they want the remote users to save files on my Samba box. No problem except that the remote users can't see my local workgroup or any of the local machines. Here's

All I will try to keep this short but I can't get any of my windows boxes to join the domain they include winXP, win2k, win9x. Server FreeBSD 4.5 Samba from Ports 2.2.2 Celery 400 with 512 meg of ram 120gig of Raid 5 U2W drives I added the machine names to samba in freebsd you must use vipw because there is no adduser plus it has a hard time with the $ at the end of the machine

I've been running samba servers with 200+ W98 machines for some time. I'm changing to W2k and everything was going fine. I've upgraded 40 boxes. One W2k box has started announcing itself as a local master browser for one of the workgroups. A samba server thinks it is master, forcing election. Samba will stop being the LMB for about 3 minutes and then will re-establish itself as

All, I have been terribly pleased with openbsd 3.2 I was using it as a mail/samba server with postifx on a pentium pro 200 with 1 gig of memory. Well I wanted to add a larger harddrive than what I have in it now only 6.4 gig. Well the machine would not see it and for some reason after hours and hours of trying I can't get a tekram 395UW and a 18gig scsi to be the boot drive and having failed

Don't forget to add the #PRE after the host info; that way it preloads it. Create one lmhosts file for the Win boxes, and copy to either \windows (win9x) \winnt\system32\drivers\etc (NT/Win2k/XP) then open a DOS Prompt and type nbtstat -R to flush/refresh the cached info. The samba box's hosts go in /etc, /lmhosts go in /etc/samba (if you're using the current defaults. Put the

All, First off I would like to say the book "The Official Samba-3 HowTO and Reference Guide" is awesome I purchased it off Amazon a couple of weeks ago. Ok now on to my problem. I have samba installed and configured and joined the domain no problem. When I run wbinfo -u I can see my domain users, when I run wbinfo -g I can see all my domain groups, BUT if I run

FreeBSD 4.10 Latest version of Samba Domain Member WinXP machines with SP2 Why do these errors continue to come up, it does not seem to be hurting a thing as the box is working perfectly no complaints other than these errors in my log file. Oct 14 16:07:00 ns1 smbd[82463]: getpeername failed. Error was Socket is not connected Oct 14 16:07:00 ns1 smbd[82463]: [2004/10/14 16:07:00, 0]

I can't seem to be able to mount any windows shares all I get is this error smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) a quick search on google leads me to believe it is broken, can anyone help me get this fixed?

All I got my samba server to join my win2k domain without any problems. But if I change the config to read security=domain it prompts the user for a username and password. If I change it to security=server it does not prompt for user names. I did some searching in the list came up with a few emails and this website http://www.sugoi.org/bits/index.php?bit_id=10 but still no change. In the /etc/host

Hi, I am trying to get samba 3.0.7 working with our win2k DC. I installed samba from the ports collection, so the kerberos library looks to be the heimdel version. I can use kinit to create a ticket and it authenticates against the DC just fine. However when I attempt to use "net ads join" it fails with the following response: [2004/11/09 16:32:30, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(183)

Hey this group uses exchange for the mailing list? This can't be true what is with all the virus warnings saying it came from exchange. But not only that it said it was deleted and that is not true when the mail reached me it still had the virus attached and my virus scanner deleted it. When these messages are sent to the group aren't they scanned before being sent to the list? Just

Can someone look at my config and let me know why my home drive might not be mapping everything else is working, also can someone point me to some docs to say exactly what the best practice is for setting permissions on the profiles share. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DIGITALRAGE netbios name = HARRIER encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted =

Good morning all and hope you all enjoyed the 4th. I have a FreeBSD box setup with Samba as a PDC for win9x win2k and winxp. Everything is working beautifully except for one thing, my win2k boxes and winxp boxes with profiles. Of course I had to have the profiles directory setup for win2k and xp clients to join the domain for some reason they were looking for that. Anyway on to the problem

I have been pulling my hairs out about this for a while now. Running the latest version of SuSE with all patches applied, I have my machine joined to the domain no problem. But when I go to use mount -t smbfs I get this error. Mounting share failed, smbmnt must be installed suid root for direct user mounts (1000,1000) smbmnt failed:1 Of course I hit Google and the list archives first before

Specifying Browser Computers When you start a computer running Windows 2000, the browser service looks in the registry for the entry MaintainServerList to determine whether a computer will become a browser. MaintainServerList is found in the following registry subkey: \HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Browser\Parameters Table I.1 shows the values to which MaintainServerList

All advanced MacOSX users: Before I go and totally mess up the MacOSX Wiki page, I want INPUT and if you are willing to do updates, please advise so that I don't step on your work (and toes). Direct, off list and out of forum replies are requested. I've turned off the spambot so you won't get those nasty messages anymore. I have better ways of dealing with spam. Thank you. James

Hi, I've been trying to install Zimbra Desktop 7 on CentOS 5.5 using the usual perl script provided. The issue is, I get a warning that my system does not have ia32 libs. I dug a bit on google and found out that 'there is no such package as ia32 libs for Centos'. I also tried all the suggested work arounds like glibc & stuff, can anyone shed more light on this? Oh, the zimbra

I have seen a ton of messages on the list in the archives in reference to this but have not been able to find an answer to it. I will try to give as much info as possible so forgive me if this messages turns out to be long. Running FreeBSD 4.10 Samba 3.0.7 IBM e305 Server P4 2.0ghz 1gig of ECC Memory Boot Drive 40gig IDE Data Drive 250gig 8meg cache IDE 2 built in Gigabit Controllers

Hello Samba Mailing List Well, the companies I contacted about this problem said that they could not help because it was an actual Samba code issue, and not a configuration issue. I have "got around it" for now by changing the internal CNAME to an A record which points to another in-house server running Apache and then creating a quick internal web site for the www.domain.com in

Just thought I'd mention this to keep other people from stubbing their toes on it... Using llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ and -emit-llvm, you need to make sure to pass -S as well, like so: ./llvm-g++ -S -emit-llvm hello.cpp not: /llvm-g++ -emit-llvm hello.cpp I'm sure that's old news to most of the people on the list, but I thought it couldn't hurt to mention it in case other people happen