similar to: SMB signing.

Hi Rowland sorry for not being clear. In my first post I already wrote: Now I have to tight security with setting those flags in the windows client: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] EnablePlainTextPassword=0 EnableSecuritySignature=1 RequireSecuritySignature=1 . . . when I change registry to RequireSecuritySignature=0, everything works like

strange i did not change anything in my windows 7 64bit. This is my full setup pretty basic. Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS, Trusty Tahr, with sernet samba 4.1.17-9 I do have 1 user for samba. pdbedit -L xbmc:5000:MediaUser [global] workgroup = PRIVE server string = %h server dns proxy = yes ; name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast #### Networking #### # interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8 eth0

Hello I have an samba server with a public share. It was configured with security=share. Now I have to tight security with setting those flags in the windows client: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] EnablePlainTextPassword=0 EnableSecuritySignature=1 RequireSecuritySignature=1 Since this change the public share is not working anymore. I found

I just joined a Windows 10 (build 10130) to our Samba 3 domain. It seems to work. I can login, a home directory is created on the server, and I can access shares. All shares are OK, except "netlogon". Logon scripts don't run, and I cannot open the netlogon share. I get "Access denied" and a prompt to enter my username and password, which keeps coming back. At the

Hi Rowland The client is stopping communication, not the server. With error 1240. And since it is working with the client setting RequireSecuritySignature=0 without any problem, ' hosts allow' cannot be either the problem nor the solution. So - setting RequireSecuritySignature=1 at the client needs a corresponding setting at the server - I guess. But even explicit settings on samba side

Hi Rowland i've made the config exactly like you sent. Doing testparm gives me Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[pub]" Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions [global] netbios name = ME

On 16/03/15 15:00, Olszewski, Raphael wrote: > > Hi Rowland > sorry for not being clear. > > In my first post I already wrote: > > Now I have to tight security with setting those flags in the windows > client: > > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] > > EnablePlainTextPassword=0 > > EnableSecuritySignature=1

On 06/04/2023 22:37, Swapneel More via samba wrote: > Greetings!! > > I am seeking your help to resolve a problem I am facing with the network > throughput of an SMB share. > > We have two SMB shares: one containing files which are bigger in size and > the other containing a large number of small files. Both share sizes are in > terabytes. > > While mapping the SMB

Hi We have 2 servers running samba 1 is linux 7 /samba 4.2.3 1 is linux 6 /samba 3.6.23-25.0.1 Both are joined to a Windows Domain Both use ADS for security (we use CAC on the client) Recently users of the samba 3.6 shares have been having trouble connecting The issue seems to be theclient registry setting :

check the output of : echo "\n" | testparm -vv | grep signing and echo "\n" | testparm -vv | grep protocol for my the default is : client max protocol = NT1 but i dont use signing. but i "think" you need to set the client signing = manadatory and client max protocol = SMB2 ( from man smb.conf ) but if anyone know this better on the list, please

Hi Louis Thank you! As i wrote in my first post, i tried even with these settings: client max protocol = SMB3 client min protocol = SMB2 client signing = required server signing = required But it was not working - as soon I use RequireSecuritySignature=1 on the client. It seems for that the client is stopping communication since the Win7-client expects something

Hi Rowland In former time there was "security=share", now i have to use "RequireSecuritySignature=1" on client side. Documentation for SMB signing says, this is only possible with "security=user", not with share. So I switched to security=user, configured guest-access to the public share and activated this RequireSecuritySignature=1 And then - with

Due to security reasons smb signing has to be activated and this share between linux and windows is now dead. And I do not find the correct settings to do a public share in this szenario. It has to be public, because the linux is'nt allowed to join the domain and on the other way, the win-clients cannot leave their domains. And I think, just signing smb-messages should not speek against a

Hai, Try these settings in global settings. ####### Authentication ####### ## stand alone everything open. security = user guest ok = yes map to guest = bad password add these to the share. guest ok = yes Sets samba open without pasword prompt. I use it at home for my kodi server. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: r.olszewski at ssc-services.de

Greetings!! I am seeking your help to resolve a problem I am facing with the network throughput of an SMB share. We have two SMB shares: one containing files which are bigger in size and the other containing a large number of small files. Both share sizes are in terabytes. While mapping the SMB share with large files on a Windows host and copying files and directories, we observe a good network

Dear All, Sorry to repeat a question I've seen mentioned before, but have not been able to find a solution to my specific instance. I have an XP SP2 box (and one with no SP), and some Win2K boxes, and a Samba server (3.0.9-2). The Win2K boxes can all copy files to the server at a reasonable speed, but the XP boxes are all dreadfully slow. FTP from the XP boxes is fine. The XP boxes can

Hello Everybody. First of all sorry for my bed english. I am in a very big trouble. I migrated our Novell to samba 3.0.2a a week ago. It works, but it is very-very slow! The novell is on a PII 233Mhz/384MB SDRAM/SCSI2 hdds, the samba is on PIV 2Ghz/1GB DDRRAM/SCSI UW320 hdds in raid5, and the novell is much-much faster! I have read the archive for long days, but everything I founded about

Goldmine seems to a compiled database application compiled in something likeClipper. Clipper applications record lock through ISAM like files (DBF). However, in Windows NT/2000/XP, Opportunistic locking is turned on by default in order to accelerate file transfer from file services. [Windows 95/98 did not Opportunisticly lock] However, opportunistic locking corrupts ISAM and ISAM like

I have a question about integrating MAc OS X and Windows 2003 AD Domain. Getting the machine to join the doamin is easy. But when I try to map the home drives, I can see them but not access them. There was a note that implied this is due to sending encrypted vs non-encrypted with samba and that Win 2K3 server SP1 broke that. It says to disable kerberos authentication on the Windows side. Is that

Anybody know the proceedure to factory reset the a 7960 phone running 6.3 SIP software? I've tried holding # when booting the phone and nothing, i can do that on my 8.2 phone but this phone i just got with 6.3 isnt working. Also **# doesnt work either.. -- ~Shaun