similar to: Issue regarding timestamp mismatch

Hi All, my problem is I am unable to configure an NT user to access a UNIX Tru64 5.1b share from their PC. I am running Samba 2.0.7 and it runs as a domain member. Here are the steps I have completed without success: Assuming <ntuser> is the NT username used to log into the NT workstation/PC. 1. Created UNIX user <username> 2. Created UNIX directory

Hi guys im having a problem getting R to numerically integrate for some function, say f(bhat)*optimize(G(bhat)), over bhat. Where id like to integrate this over some finite range, so that here as we integrate over bhat optimize would return a different optimum. For instance consider this simple example for which I cannot get R to return the desired result: f <- function(bhat) exp(bhat) g

Hello Everyone, I'm currently learning about quantile regressions. I've been using an optimizer to compare with the rq() command for quantile regression. When I run the code, the results show that my coefficients are consistent with rq(), but the intercept term can vary by a lot. I don't think my optimizer code is wrong and suspects it has something to do with the starting

Hi! I'm trying to install package Bhat on a Win machine, had a problem and figured out a fix, but would like to report the problem and make sure the fix is correct. This is what I do: 1. Download Bhat_0.9-07.tar.gz 2. Uncompress it and compress it back to Bhat_0.9-07.zip 3. Install from the R windows gui (that apparentely requires the zip compression and cannot deal with the tar.gz) But

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:42:08AM +0530, Priyank Bhatt wrote: > As James said I am attaching two file *date.cc* and *datematchdecider.cc* Please send patches, not complete source files: http://trac.xapian.org/browser/git/xapian-core/HACKING#L1176 Patches are much smaller, and don't require the reviewer to work out the exact version of the source file you started from. Cheers, Olly

I just ran example(glm) and happened to notice that models based on the Gamma distribution gives a t test, while the Poisson models give a z test. Why? Both are b/s.e., aren't they? I can't find documentation supporting the claim that the distribution is more like t in one case than another, except in the Gaussian case (where it really is t). Aren't all of the others approximations

xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead() is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path. Getting rid of xen_play_dead()'s dependency on cpu_bringup() helps in hooking on to the generic SMP booting framework. Also remove the extra call to preempt_enable() added by commit 41bd956 (xen/smp: Fix

xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead() is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path. Getting rid of xen_play_dead()'s dependency on cpu_bringup() helps in hooking on to the generic SMP booting framework. Also remove the extra call to preempt_enable() added by commit 41bd956 (xen/smp: Fix

The specs may have certain dependency on subset of 6.3 packages, but not for all other packages/binaries, as I mentioned earlier. So, to keep things rather intact, we would simply meet requirements by only updating "selected packages only". And, for now, that should be considered intermittent solution until we can safely land to a proper job as you mentioned. So, would there be any

I see. Is there a pre-existing way to do this in LLVM? Cheers, ~Siddharth. On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 02:12 Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > ConstantExprs are immutable, they can't be changed once they are created. > And a ConstantExpr can reference other ConstantExprs. So replacing all uses > of a Value in a ConstantExpr would require creating a new immutable

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > >> Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to be >> able to update from 6.3 -> 6.8. >> > > any such external specifications that insist you run an old obsolete > operating system are inherently broken.

lspci shows MSI enabled for PCI device. PCI passthrough works fine. However, as soon as the MSI driver for card is insmodded, kernel panics. This is on xen-unstable. Tried the same with xen-3.3.0 which is supposed to have MSI passthrough, but the same guest shows MSI as disabled. Any else seen this bug, or know of a workaround ? Trace is as follows : ------------[ cut here ]------------

Where can I download Bhat package? I need to use plkhci function in this package, which estimates confidence interval using likelihood ratio. Thanks. Hongsheng (Hank) Liao, PhD. Lab Manager Center for Quantitative Fisheries Ecology Old Dominion University 757-683-4571 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have noticed a definite loss of numerical precision going from 1.1.1 to 1.2.x under both Windows 98 and NT4 on x86 architecture. I noticed the difference when using the abcnon() function in the bootstrap package, but I think you could see the problem in any routine that involves subtracting relatively large numbers from each other. For the case I am looking at (see code below), the abcnon

Hi, IT seems, centos6.3 does no longer get any updates esp security fixes as per readme here: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.3/readme Is there updated source RPMs that can be rebuilt and hand patched, for example, nss-util 3.21.0-2 or openssl 1.0.1e that can be safely used on CentOS 6.3? Any other options that you can shed some light on, highly appreciated for above examples. My apologies if

Hi, Thanks for your responses. Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to be able to update from 6.3 -> 6.8. But, it would be nice to be able to update specific packages to latest that's available in 6.8 repo at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/ For example, nss-util-3.21.0-2.el6.i686.rpm

Whoops, sorry, I meant "value->replaceAllUsesWith". Should I create a new post with an updated title? Thanks Siddharth On Thu 17 Aug, 2017, 01:05 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 August 2017 at 15:39, (IIIT) Siddharth Bhat via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > From what I have observed, using

Hi, I am fitting a weighted least square regression and trying to compute SSE,SST and SSReg but I am not getting SST = SSReg + SSE and I dont know what I am coding wrong. Can you help please? xnam <-colnames(X) # colnames Design Matrix fmla1 <- as.formula(paste("Y ~",paste(xnam, collapse=

Thanks very much, understood. so, it seems, upgrading selected packages is probably going to be fine except where the compatibility matters where it would break all kinds of things. Something of such nature of request would need to be internally tested by simply updating the selected packages, test the applications previously running on 6.3 w/ these few selected 6.8 packages updates. It seems,

> > > > Show us this "no way to update system properly" to get a clear big picture > that is allowing us to provide you with potentially better solutions. > Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have been told that they will not currently consider updating their