similar to: Upgrading for Samba 2.2.2 to 2.2.4.

Hi, I have Samba server working just great. Is there a way I can work the other way around, I mean - can I mount Win shares in the Linux? Something like, making /shares/whatever see the files on //WinMachine/sharename? This could be good for backing up the files from the Windoz with the Linux box. Ronen Baram System & Network Administrator Coreflow - Scientific Solutions ltd. P.O. box

Hi, I'm running Samba 2.2.2 on RH 7.1 as PDC. Anybody knows how to save the data of the samba so that if the hardware fails and I would have to install Linux and Samba on a new machine, the Samba would continue working as is. I mean, if I save the /etc/samba directory does the SID stays and all the Win2K & WinXP would see the "same" PDC (without the need to dis-join and re-join

Hi ppl, I have a question more then problem, if I'm going to reinstall my Linux box from scratch, what do I have to backup for the Samba to work, beside the smb.conf & smbpasswd? Are those files enough to save the configuration? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. "Only Dead Fish Go With The Flow"

On 11/13/2013 04:19 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 10:47 +0200, Ronen Hod wrote: > >> I looked at how ewma works, and although it is computationally efficient, >> and it does what it is supposed to do, initially (at the first samples) it is strongly >> biased towards the value that was added at the first ewma_add. >> I suggest that you print the

On 11/13/2013 04:19 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 10:47 +0200, Ronen Hod wrote: > >> I looked at how ewma works, and although it is computationally efficient, >> and it does what it is supposed to do, initially (at the first samples) it is strongly >> biased towards the value that was added at the first ewma_add. >> I suggest that you print the

Hi, I''m trying to have a checkbox, that when clickes sends an update to the server and in turn modify the UI with feedback on the success of the operation. The main difficulty I''m encountering is that I can''t pass the checkbox value if I use the standard PrototypeHelpers. I''m using remote_function to build the function call, but it doesn''t allow

Im using a parameterized class in my site.pp: class development($user) { class{"basenode": user => $user} class{"nodejs": user => $user} include "coffeescript" include "ruby" } This class defines nodejs class that epects a user as input: class nodejs($user) { class {"nodejs::npm": user => $user} $node_ver =

Hello! When using the command "write.table" I want to convert the format: 5e-04 to .0005. How can I do it? The only option I found is to use write.matrix but then I cant add rownames. Thank you Ronen [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am not sure how to get the symbols necessary, however the following is the backtrace (this is Fedora 19 latest everything): Jul 8 03:23:02 MX dovecot: auth: Fatal: block_alloc(2147483648): Out of memory Jul 8 03:23:02 MX dovecot: auth: Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x5f437) [0x7f97a952f437] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x5f4fe) [0x7f97a952f4fe] ->

On 11/13/2013 12:21 AM, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all workloads. > For workloads

On 11/13/2013 12:21 AM, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all workloads. > For workloads

Hello! Can anyone help me. I am using the posterior.mode from the result of glmmML. It apears to be different from the BLUe estimate of the RANDOM statement in PROC NLMIXED in SAS. Why is that? Thank you Ronen [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 10:47 +0200, Ronen Hod wrote: > I looked at how ewma works, and although it is computationally efficient, > and it does what it is supposed to do, initially (at the first samples) it is strongly > biased towards the value that was added at the first ewma_add. > I suggest that you print the values of ewma_add() and ewma_read(). If you are > happy with the

Hello all, I've just installed the Fedora core 2 and tried to compile the asterisk and the zaptel drivers Asterisk went smooth but I had troubles with the zaptel. I did copy the .config file under the kernel source and make oldconfig and make include/asm ; make include/version.h ; make SUBDIRS=scripts I was able to compile the zaptel source, using the make linux26 and then ran make install. I

I am trying to set a working directory on a samba server where all users of the network can read and write each other's documents. I have already mounted such directory using smbmount on the client and it is readable and writable on the client and server. However, when the client is saving a file it becomes read only for the others. How do I enable it to create files with read write

Hello (I''m new to this group so please pardon any inappropriateness), I''m a primary maintainer of the schema_plus gem<https://github.com/lomba/schema_plus/>, which adds some capabilities to rails'' schema definitions. The gem has been around for several years and is pretty reliable. I''ve been wondering whether there''d be interest in folding

On 03/13/2014 09:28 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > On 03/10/2014 04:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:28:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs >>>> exceeds VHOST_MAX_PEND. This is used to reduce the memory occupation >>>> of both host and guest. But it was too

Very simple setup. We have a NT4 pdc and some windows boxes. We have a large raid running on linux that we use samba to share to the rest of the network. 2.2.4 works great, 3.0 doesn't using the same smb.conf. I'm sure there are some things that have changed but even trying to take the examples on the site and mod them to fit my case doesn't work either. The linux/samba box name is

Ok. Hi everybody. It's my first posting here. If I make something wrong, please notice me . And excuse me for my evil english (I will improve :-) ) . I'm trying to upgrade samba from 2.2.4 to 3.0.14 version and I would like to use the same smb.conf that I had. But something looks wrong in printing system , there are a lot of new options and I don't know why my old parameters

I have a stabily running Samba 2.2.0 operation in place. I've very happy and for once don't have to fight with a box to do file sharing. I've worked around some issues I've got (like ownership and ACLs) that are not directly samba problems, in fact they are probably Administrator problems. However, I've reached an impass. I can no longer use 2.2.0 because the big beast of