similar to: Windows 2000 SP2 WINS server<--- vpn ---> Samba 2.0.10 WINS server

Hi everyone. I am so baffled by the following problem: Office 1 is using ADSL and it is building a VPN tunnel with IPSEC to Office 2. Both ends are using shorewall/freeswan firewalls. Diagram: Office1 fw --- VPN TUNNEL --- Office2 fw --- cisco router ----- VLANS | DMZ Office 1 has the following interfaces: 2: eth0:

------------------ ---------| external ip eth0 | ---------- -------------------------- | |--------------------------- | -------| Internal IP eth1 | -------------------------- | |-------------------------- ---------| external Ip eth2 | ---------- -------------------------- i want to put web and ftp traffic

------------------ ---------| external ip eth0 | ---------- -------------------------- | |--------------------------- | -------| Internal IP eth1 | -------------------------- | |-------------------------- ---------| external Ip eth2 | ---------- -------------------------- i want to put web and ftp traffic to

Hi, still trying to understand one thing. I would definitely like to tell iptables to accept all packets coming from remote vpn only if they hit the $VIRTUALVPNINTERFACE. I tried -o ipsec0 but this is not working, looks like ipsec0 device doesn't exist or it is not recognized. I red on the Openswan users list, that Linux kernel 2.6 native ipsec don't create ipsec* interface (if I am

Hi. I am trying to force some traffic that goes to address 203.7.93.94 through a VPN tunnel. I use freeswan 1.98b and Shorewall 1.4.6c in one machine. The 203.7.93.94 is in the DMZ on the other end. (Both ends use the same shorewall and freeswan). I have successfully set up a tunnel between the two network (using a point to point topology, not hub). I added a static routing that redirect

Hi list, I am trying to create a VPN between two different locations. On the first location we have a cisco pix 525 Natting the internal 192.168.100.x network, while on the second location we have a Centos3 box Natting via iptables the internal 192.168.10.x netowrk. My goal is to connect this 2 over the internet via IPsec. I created the IPsec Net2Net via the network configuration graphic

Im having an intermittent problem with samba. Im running samba 3.0.2a on solaris 8 that i downloaded from sunfreeware.com I have my smb.conf setup to get passwords from my active directory server and it usually works fine. I ran a net join command like so to originally join the domain: root# net join -S WIN2KSERVER -w MYDOMAIN.com -U Administrator Password: Joined domain MYDOMAIN. It will run

I sent this out yesterday and im still having this problem, has anyone seen this before? original email: Im having an intermittent problem with samba. Im running samba 3.0.2a on solaris 8 that i downloaded from sunfreeware.com I have my smb.conf setup to get passwords from my active directory server and it usually works fine. I ran a net join command like so to originally join the domain: root#

Hi List, slightly OT but i have Xen and Windows running (xen 3.2.0, hvm, win 2k3) on top of a lvm volume. Now i want to delete such a volume but i got the message: $ lvremove /dev/Xen0/Win2kServer Can''t remove open logical volume "Win2kServer" The volume is not in use by any VM, but there is a partition table on it with 8Megs of free space and a ntfs partition. I also got 2

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: nome cognome [mailto:digiland_oohay@yahoo.it] Gesendet: 17 September 2003 09:30 An: Brian Reichholf Betreff: Re: [Samba] smbadduser problem ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Reichholf" <brian.reichholf@login.co.at> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:42 AM Subject: [Samba] smbadduser problem

I have just setup a VPN connection three sites using IPCOP. Everything seems to be talking ok, apart from browsing the network neighborhood. There are no NT/Win2K/XP servers running on any of the sites, all sites are just running win98 pc's using tcp/ip. I have tried configuring all PC's to be on the same workgroup and setup sharing, but still each site can only see the pc's

Hello! I am using shorewall shorewall-2.0.11-1 on fedora core2 (iptables-1.2.9-95.7). My box has 2 physical nic´s plus one virt. ipsec interface for a freeswan-vpn connection. A few days ago, portsentry spit out a lot of connections from windows clients (port 135, 445). Ooops. I review my shorewall settings but could not find a mistake. So I took a win-client and established a second

Hi, Problem: I want 2 vpn tunnels for 2 subnets over one interface ipsec0. Documentation only describes config for 1 vpn or road warriors. I defined 2 vpn zones ''fre'' and ''swe''. #ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS net Net Internet zone loc Local Local fre VPN_Fre VPN Fre swe VPN_Swe VPN Swe Interface ipsec0 is tunnel over eth1. Local is eth0. ipsec0 serves 2 zones: fre

Thanks fort he advice John, i read that on the link that nome sent. I filled it out in the smb.conf, and edited the usermap file, then restarted the smb server, and it didn't work *shrugs* it works fine with ftp, so that'll do for now. Thanks anyway. Cheers, -brian -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: John H Terpstra [mailto:jht@samba.org] Gesendet: 17 September 2003 15:04 An: Brian

try smbadduser mr no mr:test ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467 Brian Reichholf

Hello Gurus, I am a small problem with routing and here are the details. Interfaces on my server: * ipsec0 - 172.19.58.94 * tunl0 - 172.19.58.94 * eth0 - 172.19.58.94 Now, the problem is that there is another host 172.19.58.200. All communication to 172.19.58.200 should be through tunl0, and all the data should be secured using IPSec (tunnel mode - because there are more machines on my

i'm currently running samba 2.2.8a as a domain member server to an NT4Server.... no problems will be upgrading the PDC to a W2K server next week... there isn't a need to use LDAP with Samba with W2KServer is there ? I can still go with my current setup can I ?

I am having some trouble creating a two-way domain trust account between Samba3 and Windows 2000 Server. The Windows 2000 server is an AD domain controller, and my Samba 3 server has an LDAP backend and is running on Ubuntu 9.04 64bit. Samba 3 is acting as the WINS server, and the Windows server has been pointed to the samba server for WINS in the TCP/IP settings on the network adapter.

Hi all. Pretty new in Linux side of the world. I'm trying to run Samba 3.x on Fedora-core-1 in an ADS environment, with krb5 authentication. Installed Samba 3.0.2rc2 from source, installed the required libraries for kerberos MIT, configured smb.conf and krb5.conf. Run net ads join -U administrator and it worked, i can see the machine account in the active directory. From my linux box I

Hello all, I am working with kernel 2.2.20 with the necessary options configured into the kernel to support all of the wonderfully fancy routing features: - routing based on ToS - routing based on fwmark - multiple routing tables This same kernel is in use elsewhere, and is routing based on fwmark with success. This leads me to believe that my kernel is OK and that I have another