similar to: Interleaved writes fwom W2K and NT4

Hi Haven't seen any responses to my earlier post (Transferring PDC duties to Samba) so here's a slightly different approach I'm trying which someone can hopefully shed some light on. Is it possible to transfer domain-specific data from an NT4 PDC to a Samba 2.2.2 server, switch off the NT4 machine, set up smb.conf, switch on the Samba box such that the attached NT4/Win2000

Hello, is it possible to connect a Nortel i2004, (i2002) IP Phone to an * PBX? I have seen on the net that there should be an SIP firmware aviable for the phone, anyone an idea where to get it? Because orginally they use a own protocol to connect to an Meridian, BCM or CSE1K. Another idea is to write a module for * that can handle this protocol. bye SLiME

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:13:55PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Since we construct our error/debug messages via multiple calls > to stdio primitives, we are at risk of multiple threads interleaving > their output if they try to output at once. Add a mutex to group > related outputs into an atomic chunk. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > --- >

On 26 May 2016 at 19:12, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Is there a compile-time and/or potential runtime cost that makes > enableInterleavedAccessVectorization() default to 'false'? > > I notice that this is set to true for ARM, AArch64, and PPC. > > In particular, I'm wondering if there's a reason it's not enabled for

Hi guys n girls! This is my first post here. I read that wine was made for 16bit orginally and had support to run it. Recently tried to install it with wine skin but I get a error message at launch. I have installed several 32bit applications before and they have worked flawlessly but this does not run yet. Maybe you guys know better?! =) The game itselft seems to be a 16bit Macromedia Director

Thanks Ayal! I'll take a look at DENBench. As another data point - I tried enabling this on our internal benchmarks. I'm seeing one regression, and it seems to be a regression of the "good" kind - without interleaving we don't vectorize the innermost loop, and with interleaving we do. The vectorized loop is actually significantly faster when benchmarked in isolation, but in

Is there a compile-time and/or potential runtime cost that makes enableInterleavedAccessVectorization() default to 'false'? I notice that this is set to true for ARM, AArch64, and PPC. In particular, I'm wondering if there's a reason it's not enabled for x86 in relation to PR27881: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27881 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hello, I recently upgraded our file server from RedHat6.2 to RedHat7.2. This upgraded our (working) Samba 2.0.x to 2.2.1a-4. Now, the windows98 machines on the network can print without problems. The 2K/NT4 machines cannot print, but they experience no problems with file sharing operations (writeable /home/$USER). The 2K/NT4 machines had been printing fine prior to the upgrade. I won't

Hi Samba 2.2.5, Linux 2.4.9. We're running a small network of half-a-dozen W2K and NT4 clients. We have an NT4 server and have just migrated all our file serving to our Samba server. It's immediately obvious that our W2K clients are now running much slower when accessing files on the Samba server. The NT4 machines are fine. On a W2K/NT4 dual-boot machine, W2K runs ten times slower - no

Interleaved access is not enabled on X86 yet. We looked at this feature and got into conclusion that interleaving (as loads + shuffles) is not always profitable on X86. We should provide the right cost which depends on number of shuffles. Number of shuffles depends on permutations (shuffle mask). And even if we estimate the number of shuffles, the shuffles are not generated in-place. Vectorizer

Hello samba-insiders, we have a WinNT 4.0 SP5 PDC and our samba 2.2.3a is member of the domain. The roaming profiles of our clients stored on the samba 2.2.3a server. All seams to be perfect but only clients with W2K SP2 cannot use there roaming profiles. ---> "Access Denyed" is the W2K errro message. But if the same user loggs on on a client machine with W2K SP1 all things are ok.

Hi Ayal, Elena, I'd really like to enable this by default. As I wrote above, I didn't see any regressions in internal benchmarks, and there doesn't seem to be anything in SPEC2006 either. I do see a performance improvement in an internal benchmark (that is, a real workload). Would you be able to provide an example that gets pessimized? I have no doubt you've seen regressions

Thank you so much. it run fine. Can you please resolve following issue; I now have support for v2048i32 but my backend supports v64i32 so ultimately v2048i32 needs to be split into 32 v64i32 instructions. the only difference between 2 is if its orginally v2048i32 i want my registers assignment from REG_A set. if its v64i32 originally, then i want registers from set REG_B. How to accomplish

I have 2 related questions about functions. 1. I am writing a function to plot data from a time series with the form myplot<-function(data, d1,d2) { } Where d1 and d2 are two dates in a time series. The idea being that if no values for d1 and d2 are entered then the function defaults to plotting the whole time series, else it plots the data for the interval specified by d1 and d2. I am

Michael Smith wrote: >Whilst I accept that there are many good uses for chunked data, I >think the transformation is trivial, particularly given certain >characteristics of the Ogg container. Remember, the data, if you read >an ogg stream into memory, is _already_ likely to be non-contiguous, >due to ogg's structure. It's trivial, and has insignificant additional

Sampo Syreeni wrote: > Secondly, I'd like to see the channel map fleshed out in more detail. Sampo, I did flesh out the wiki a **little** more. Is the intent clearer now? > (Beware of the pet peeve...) What is that pet peeve? > IMO the mapping should cover at least the > channel assignments possible in WAVE files, the most common Ambisonic > ones, and perhaps some added

We checked the gathered data again. All regressions that we see are in 32-bit mode. The 64-bit mode looks good overall. - Elena From: Michael Kuperstein [mailto:mkuper at google.com] Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 02:56 To: Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> Cc: Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>; Matthew Simpson <mssimpso at codeaurora.org>;

Thanks Ayal! On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Zaks, Ayal <ayal.zaks at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > > Don’t quite have a full reproducer for you yet. You’re welcome to try and > see what’s happening in 32 bit mode when enabling interleaving for the > following, based on “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YIQ#From_RGB_to_YIQ”: > > > > void rgb2yik

I would be very grateful if you specify whether there is some way to allocate registers (different order) / from different register sets to the same instruction based on the vector width/ no of iterations. I have tried several alternatives but could not succeed. Also I have asked this question many times but no one responds. Is there something wrong with this?? Kindly guide me. Thank You On

Hi Michael, Sometime back I did some experiments with interleave vectorizer and did not found any degrade, probably my tests/benchmarks are not extensive enough to cover much. Elina is the right person to comment on it as she already experienced cases where it hinders performance. For interleave vectorizer on X86 we do not have any specific costing, it goes to BasicTTI where the costing is not