similar to: large_file feature- where is it?

I know there is no straightforward way to recover deleted files on an ext3 file system, but is there any way to recover from an accidental mke2fs? -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Raines email: raines@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 (2301) 13th Street tel:(617)-724-2369

I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel 2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3 complains with EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80). I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made filesystem, and it completed with

Hi, Fedora Core ext3 file systems newbie questions: Just interested in the Linux ext3 features but got confused with "large_file" and "ext_attr". First, what's the "large_file" feature REALLY means? For file systems created with same commands and options some file systems have it on while some not. It is said that the feature is automatic -- If there is a

New api mke2fs for full configuration of filesystem. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/ext2.c | 452 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/generator_actions.ml | 18 ++ gobject/Makefile.inc | 6 +- src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 4 files changed, 475 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Hi there, I'm running software raid 1 across two 60GB IDE drives and booting off the raid device. The raid device holds an ext3 filesystem. Each drive is configured as a master on its own bus. The system is redhat 7.2, stock kernel 2.4.9-31smp. The hardware platform is a Dell precision dual 2Ghz P4 system with 1G of memory. I have two of these systems, both configured identitically.

> Hi, > > I'm trying to install openssh-3.7.1p2 on a HP-UX 10.20 machine. > Everything goes well until the "make install" command hangs on "Generating > public/private rsa1 key pair". Even the ssh-keygen command hangs on (I've > tried it after aborting the make install). The problem remains the same > using or not the configure option

i posted on rhel list about proper creating of 6tb ext3 filesystem and tuning here.......http://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-November/msg00239.html i am reading lots of ext3 links like...... http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/ http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/052533.html http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html ............but

After a (hardware) crash yesterday, I was unable to boot up due to unrecoverable ide errors (according to the printk()s) when accessing the root filesystem's journal for recovery. Unable to recover, I tried deleting the has_journal option, but that was disallowed given that the needs_recovery flag was set. I saw no way to unset that flag. Unable to access the backups (they were on a fw

Hello, I noticed something unusual today. If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size I'm using. I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 and i386: $ echo test >test.txt $ ls -l test.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 filbranden filbranden 5 Mar 11 17:24 test.txt $ du -h test.txt 8.0K

Hello, How to upgrade existing ext3 partition to new features? Moved from RHEL3 to RHEL4. I had to install from c0d0p6 so partition could not be reformated during install. Thanks, Mindaugas # dumpe2fs /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 | fgrep features dumpe2fs 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype needs_recovery sparse_super # dumpe2fs

Hopefully this is a simple issue or just my ignorance on the results returned by "df -k" but can anyone explain why the available block is 0 if total 1k-blocks - Used is greater than 0? #df -k /ems/bigdisk/ Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg0-bigdisk 397367512 383562960 0 100% /<name> Filesystem volume

--- configure.ac | 8 +++++--- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index da03c9f..7606bca 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ dnl For ArchLinux handler. AC_CHECK_PROG(PACMAN,[pacman],[pacman],[no]) dnl Required programs, libraries. -AC_PATH_PROG([INSMODSTATIC],[insmod.static],[no])

Hi. I'm using e2fsprogs 1.23 on a Roswell system with a patched 2.4.7 kernel (using patch ext3-2.4-0.9.5-247) and am trying to create an ext3 filesystem whose journal is located on another device. The incantation I'm trying is: mke2fs -j -J device=/dev/hdc2 /dev/hdc3 I keep getting an error along the lines of "mke2fs: Journal superblock not found". I've tried creating

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:18:54PM +0200, Nikolay Ivanets wrote: > вт, 18 лют. 2020 о 10:48 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> пише: > > > > When calculating the initial size of the disk we must estimate > > how much space is taken by the input. This is quite difficult. > > > > For directories we used ‘du --apparent-size -bs DIR’. This is wrong >

Hi, I have a doubt if I use the mke2fs option the right way. I formatted two different disks, one with $ mke2fs -b 4096 -E stride=16 -m 1 -T news /dev/sdd and the other with $ mke2fs -b 4096 -E stride=16 -m 1 -T largefile4 /dev/sde sdd is supposed to get files between 8k and 16k. sde will handle files with a fixed size of 32Mb. Then I tried this : $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mount-sdx/file bs=4k

Hi again, I have the following scenario: I've got a partition which has exactly 14659312 blocks: $ fdisk -l /dev/hda Disk /dev/hda: 28.5 GB, 28520497152 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders Units = Zylinder of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Ger?t Boot Start End Blocks Id System (...) /dev/hda4 1643 3467 14659312+ 83 Linux (...)

Hi, I created a RAID1 array of two physical HDD's with chunk size of 64KiB under Debian "wheezy" using mdadm. As a next step, I would like to create an ext3(or ext4) file-system to this RAID1 array using mke2fs utility. According to RAID-related tutorials, I should create the file-system like this: # mkfs.ext3 -v -L myarray -m 0.5 -b 4096 -E stride=16,stripe-width=32 /dev/md0

These came up on dmesg this morning: attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1635237736, limit=976791680 attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1635237736, limit=976791680 EXT3-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 4293394431, count = 1 attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1930439616,

Hello, We have run and stopped by chance command "fsck -y" on one of our raid disks (with ext3 file system). After that we have found that SOME files disappeared (they are not seen in the directories where they have been before). The data are extremely important and contain a lot of programs, scripts for some data analysis and very hard to recover by hands. I have run ''fsck

I got the following error, but there''s no "cycle" I commented out File["/dev/sdb3"] and it works, but of course would choke if I ran it and the requirement were not met err: Could not apply complete catalog: Found cycles in the following relationships: File[/dev/sdb1] => Exec[echo -e "0,290\n,290\n," | sfdisk /dev/sdb] Here''s the node: node