Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "ext3 hack: using the journal to replicate a filesystem"
2003 Oct 02
1
rsync behind a NAT
Hi all,
I'm trying to synchronise a whole directory
tree using rsync, from a server named "dev", to the
three servers named "w1, w2, w3", hidden behind the
server named "prod".
So I issued the following command, which
failed:
dev:~# rsync -avz -e 'ssh prod ssh w2' /users/prod/ root@prod:/home/
bash: prod: command not found
rsync: connection
2004 Jul 22
2
Ext3 filesystem aborting journal at random times (Maxtor 300GB disk)
Hi,
Sorry if this is an old and fixed issue but I can't really seem to find
a definitive explanation/fix to this in the mail lists. Ever since I
upgraded to FC2 my server randomly decides that it can no longer access
the disk and "aborts" the ext3 journal leaving it read-only as
expected. I've seen the same errors on other mail list, explained away
as disk or disk cable
2023 Apr 28
1
gluster 10.3: task glfs_fusenoti blocked for more than 120 seconds
Good morning,
we've recently had some strange message in /var/log/syslog.
System:
debian bullseye, kernel 5.10.0-21-amd64 and 5.10.0-22-amd64
gluster 10.3
The message look like:
Apr 27 13:30:18 piggy kernel: [24287.715229] INFO: task
glfs_fusenoti:2787 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Apr 27 13:30:18 piggy kernel: [24287.715327] Not tainted
5.10.0-22-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.178-3
Apr
2023 May 02
1
[Gluster-devel] gluster 10.3: task glfs_fusenoti blocked for more than 120 seconds
I don't think the issue is on gluster side, it seems the issue is on kernel
side (possible deadlock in fuse_reverse_inval_entry)
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bda9a71980e083699a0360963c0135657b73f47a
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:48?PM Hu Bert <revirii at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> we've recently had some strange
2005 Apr 09
3
short read while checking ext3 journal
My UPS failed and my server took an 'unscheduled outage' a few weeks ago.
The only casualty appears to be a volume I used for backup. I usually
maintain data on multiple hard disks, but in this case I errantly had some
data (of marginal value) on this file system.
At this point, the data is not worth enough for me to send the drive out
for data recovery, but it's worth enough to
2007 Jun 20
9
[PATCH 0/9] x86 boot protocol updates
[ This patch depends on the cross-architecture ELF cleanup patch. ]
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which
2007 Jun 20
9
[PATCH 0/9] x86 boot protocol updates
[ This patch depends on the cross-architecture ELF cleanup patch. ]
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which
2007 Feb 15
3
Re: Incremental Updates
As an alternative to polling the client, as Ryan describes, you could
consider piggy-backing the status updates on the back of other ajax
responses. Which way you go depends entirely on the nature of your app, in
particular:
1. how frequently it generates ajax traffic anyway
2. how long the server-side process is going to take
If the server-side process takes, say, 20 seconds, polling is a
2003 Aug 18
2
another seriously corrupt ext3 -- pesky journal
Hi Ted and all,
I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have
to describe my problem in some detail.
The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box
running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB
IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms
are very similar to what Eddy described
2002 Feb 20
2
ext3 + loop + journaling
[ If this is explained somewhere else (HOWTO or FAQ), please give me a
pointer. ]
Is there any way to mix loop-device (and in particular) loop-AES and ext3
together in data journaling mode?
Ie.
bottom -> to -> top
ext3 - loop-AES - ext3
raw - loop-AES - ext3
Or am I shooting myself to leg, I am?
BR, Jani
--
Jani Averbach
2006 Jun 13
0
gem install rails --include-dependencies fails
Hello,
I''m very new to ruby, and don''t understand the following error,
while trying to
auto-install rubyonrails via gem;
[root@svrlnweb02 root]# gem install rails --include-dependencies
/opt/rubygems/0.8.11/bin/gem:3:in `require'': no such file to load --
rubygems (LoadError)
from /opt/rubygems/0.8.11/bin/gem:3
[root@svrlnweb02 root]# type gem
gem is
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the
hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the
hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the
hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 06
7
[PATCH RFC 0/7] proposed updates to boot protocol and paravirt booting
This series:
1. Updates the boot protocol to version 2.07
2. Clean up the existing build process, to get rid of tools/build and
make the linker do more heavy lifting
3. Make the bzImage payload an ELF file. The bootloader can extract
this as a naked ELF file by skipping over boot_params.setup_sects worth
of 16-bit setup code.
4. Update the boot_params to 2.07, and update the
2007 Jun 06
7
[PATCH RFC 0/7] proposed updates to boot protocol and paravirt booting
This series:
1. Updates the boot protocol to version 2.07
2. Clean up the existing build process, to get rid of tools/build and
make the linker do more heavy lifting
3. Make the bzImage payload an ELF file. The bootloader can extract
this as a naked ELF file by skipping over boot_params.setup_sects worth
of 16-bit setup code.
4. Update the boot_params to 2.07, and update the
2005 Dec 11
4
Problem with acts_as_paranoid: "ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): group"
Here''s the full error:
1) Error:
test_add_message_to_existing_ticket(TicketTest):
ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): group
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.2.4/lib/active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:48:in
`assert_valid_keys''
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/acts_as_paranoid-0.2/lib/acts_as_paranoid.rb:125:in
`validate_find_options''
2002 Apr 18
1
Kernel Panic while trying to use data=journal on root filesystem.
I am trying to use data=journal for my root file system. If I add:
Kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.7-10 ro root=/dev/hda2 rootflags=data=journal
To my grub.conf file, all I get is a kernel Panic, "EXT2-fs:
Unrecognized mount option data.
Kernel panic: VFS unable to mount root fs on 01:00"
My fstab file is:
LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults
1 1
Any suggestions?
2007 Sep 07
1
ext3 inode and journal limitation
Hello
what is the limitation of inode and journaling on 32 bit ext3 file system.
what about 64 bit.
Thanks
2007 Jan 24
1
ext3 journal from windows
hai
is there any way to view the contents of ext3 journal form windows?
regards
______________________________________
Scanned and protected by Email scanner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20070124/02f1d0a5/attachment.htm>