similar to: Freeing blocks not in datazone

Since I ain't got a better place to report this, I do it here: Kernel 2.4.20-ac1 # uptime 16:31:00 up 2 days, 22:10, 7 users, load average: 1.89, 2.20, 2.99 This is our main mailbox server. We're running ext3: # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 /dev/sdb5 /boot ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/sda6 /home ext3 rw,noatime,nosuid 0 0 /dev/sdb8 /tmp

Hi, I just noticed that my file server running 2.4.18-pre3 + IDE patches & NTFS patches has this error message in the logs: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,4)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 33554432, count = 1 This is the only ext3 error I have seen and the uptime is currently over 74 days. The error actually appeared two weeks ago. The timing coincides well with

Hi - We have had 3 rather major occurances of ext3 filesystem corruption lately, i.e. so bad we couldn't event mount, and fsck didn't help. I am looking for pointers, that could help us investigate the root cause. In general... We are running RedHat WS 3 Update 6, 2.4.21-40.2.ELsmp or 2.4.21-37.ELsmp We have a small SAN system that looks like this

Hi, I am creating CentOS install usb keys and, apart from a few problems, it mostly works... 1. OT: My server HP does not seem to want to boot on it if I set the write protection on. 2. Anaconda tries to fetch the ks.cfg too early... It detects sda, then detects the RAID adapter, then re-detects sda with a "waiting for device to settle before scanning". Anaconda tries to access

A mysql database file was copied over to a new box running Fedora Core 1. The kernel was updated to the latest Fedora release. However mysqld complains about corrupted tables. The kernel was then updated to 2.6.5 mysqld still complains about corrupted tables. Hardware: Dual PIII 800. 3ware RAID dmesg: ... ... ... EXT3-fs error (device sdb1): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in

hiya! i'm currently running 2.4.12-ac1 w/o any further ext3 patches. i've got a dir with some fairly big files (like 15mb/file) in it and while sfv-checking these i got the following errors: Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde attempt to access beyond end of device Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde 16:42: rw=0, want=600889688, limit=12289725 Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde attempt to

Hi I've got serious troubles - I posted a while back about experiencing ext3 errors using 2.4.18, at the time I put the problems down to harddisk failure, but these problems are occurring more and more - not all of our systems are having this problem but 3 systems have now shown this problem. The hardware is essentially the same, the only difference is disk manufacturers but we've now

Dear all, I'm new R's user and I'm looking for package dealling with Path analysis. Does it exist ? Where ? Best, Regis Martin PhD Student Laboratory of Altitutdinal Population Biology UMR CNRS 5553 Universté de Savoie Bât. Belledonnes 00 33 (0)4 79 75 86 44 regis.martin at univ-savoie.fr

hi I'm student in master, for my work I use R software, I make a grphic, I will, for each point on graphic the corresponding date of consulting. The number of consultations is variable for the patients ( min=6, max= 44) thank's --------------------------------- mails ! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi I am trying to install CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180 G6 which has HP Smart Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver. I have 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD and configured RAID 1+0 using System BIOS, the BIOS detects usable disk space as 940GB disk space, when i start installing the OS, it does not detect HP Smart Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver As per

Hi, When trying to run a particular program, I reproducibly get a few dozen kernel messages of the form: attempt to access beyond end of device 03:06: rw=0, want=536995844, limit=11680168 attempt to access beyond end of device 03:06: rw=0, want=1342296068, limit=11680168

Dear all, I have a dataframe of names (netw), with each cell including last name and initials of an author; some cells have NA. I would like to extract only the last name from each cell; this new dataframe is calle 'res' Here is what I do: res <- data.frame(matrix(NA, nrow=dim(netw)[1], ncol=dim(netw)[2])) for (i in 1:x) { wh <- regexpr('[a-z]{3,}',

every one,I meet a problem: I used reahat9.0(kernel 2.4.20-8smp,I installed a SCSI RAID Card),and there are always some problems and them the system is dead. is anyone can help me about it? Thanks Crist Below is the error log: Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,18)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1382828372, count = 1 Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1

This is a 2.2.19 machine with ext3-0.0.7a and quota support running. The symptoms are a particular NFS export hangs (for linux clients but not Solaris clients?) the local filesystem gives the following: EXT3-fs warning (device sd(8,49)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 2213 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,49)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1563120916,

Hello List, I am working on creating periodograms from IP network traffic logs using the Fast Fourier Transform. The FFT requires all the data points to be evenly-spaced in the time domain (constant delta-T), so I have a step where I zero-pad the data. Lately I've been wondering if there is a faster way to do this. Here's what I've got: * data1 is a data frame consisting of

A brand new system setup with RH 7.3 is still Oopsing after every X hours. The problem started after about 1 week without errors. Sometimes everything is locked, sometimes still messages are written to /var/log/messages. Sometimes other processes keep running (can still ping the machine) I upgraded the kernel to 2.4.18-19.7.x, changed the memory, but still got problems. When I read all sort of

[sorry if this isn't threaded right... I just subscribed] Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > There are two reasons for the reserve. One is to reserve space on the > partition containing /var and /etc for log files, etc. The other is > to avoid the performance degredation when the last 5-10% of the disk > space is used. (BSD actually reserves 10% by default.) Given that > the

Hi ! My system is RH7.2 with Adaptec/DPT/I2O drivers (http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/dpt/). There is a 2 disk RAID 1 array which had no disk fail. Several partition on it: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 1.9G 435M 1.4G 24% / /dev/sda2 13G 3.2G 9.1G 26% /home none 504M 0 503M 0% /dev/shm At this time, all

Hi, I recently upgraded one of my fileservers from 2.4.16 to 2.4.18 plus the ext3-cvs.patch that Andrew Morton pointed me to for addressing and assertion failure. Since then I have been getting lots of errors like: May 21 14:07:03 glass kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext3_add_entry: bad entry in directory #2945366: rec_len %% 4 != 0 - offset=0, inode=1886221359, rec_len=24927,

I recently rebooted one of my machines and was greeted with a message about one of my ext3 partitions having some errors. I dutifully started e2fsck on the partition, but after a few hours of some useful messages about fixing inodes, it then started printing out lists of ascending numbers which I'm not sure how to interpret. The first time I noticed this, these numbers were in the 4000000