similar to: reading journal statistics

We want to run multi-drive systems we have in a JBOD mode, where each drive is basically a filesystem to itself. With the drives we currently have, we expect to have multiple failures, primarily unrecoverable ECC read errors or sometimes the drive just dying altogether. How does ext[23] handle these two primary conditions? Using them in a software RAID mode, I have sometimes seen problems with

I have a pxelinux I'm working with and I want the default option to be to boot off the local mbr. According to the docs, if I specify localboot 0, it should return to the BIOS and continue to the next device. When I do this, though, the pxe agent exists (PXE-M0F), but the BIOS never continues on. Is this a BIOS issue? If so, has anyone else figured out a way to work around it? * Philip

Hi, We are currently doing SpecSFS comparison benchmarking to evaluate advantages of FS journaling to NVRAM card versus journaling to hard disks. We compare NFS performance for Linux file server with ext3 file system in ?data=journal? mode for three different locations of the file system journal: - inside main file system - on a dedicated HD - on an NVRAM PCI card The file system is

Hi,, I wud just like to inform that the previous issue of memdisk not booting compressed images still persists !! The release 2.05 that was supposed to fix this issue dint yet solve the problem !! Please, let me know if more info on the problem is required !! Bye, Jassi >From: syslinux-request at zytor.com >Reply-To: syslinux at zytor.com >To: syslinux at zytor.com >Subject:

Greetings Michal, > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 2:51 PM > From: "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> > To: "daggs" <daggs@gmx.com>, libvirt-users@redhat.com > Subject: Re: unable to find any master var store for loader error > > Hey, > > I'll paste the interesting part of domain XML here so that it doesn't > get lost:

Hi! I'm working currently on integration of UEFI/SecureBoot support into oVirt. And I have several questions about UEFI/SecureBoot support in libvirt. Can you please help me with them? For UEFI I add the following to the XML: <loader readonly="yes" secure="no" type="pflash"> /usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd </loader> <nvram

I've seen this come up on occassion, but every NAS OEM that uses NVRAM I've ever talked to over the last 18 months won't tell me anything about their equipment nor their suppliers. Recently, Micro Memory contacted me. Is anyone here using their products? FYI, their 64-bit PCI 128MB-1GB NVRAM board is here:

On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 20:13 +0300, Aleksei wrote: > I'm running libvirt in user session and libvirt creates VARS part of OVMF in ~/.config/libvirt/qemu/nvram/ > Check your xml, there should be lines like this: > <os> >     <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-2.7'>hvm</type> >     <loader readonly='yes'

Greetings All, following a suggestion I got here on how to properly boot uefi-q35 guest, I found an weird config in the xml. this is what I see when I run virsh edit streamer-vm-q35: <os firmware='efi'> <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-5.0'>hvm</type> <boot dev='hd'/> </os> when I run virsh dumpxml streamer-vm-q35, I get this:

Hi, i want to port an open-source project to sparc. I just downloaded OpenSolaris (sol-nv-b75-sparc-...iso), created an empty image for the hard disk, and tried to start qemu in a linux x64bit-host: qemu-system-sparc -hda test.img -cdrom sol-nv-b75-sparc-v1.iso -boot d -nographic The output says: Nvram id QEMU_BIOS, version 1 CPUs: 1 nvram error detected, zapping pram Welcome to OpenBIOS

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, i have a system connected to an external DAS (SCSI) array, using ZFS. the array has an nvram write cache, but it honours SCSI cache flush commands by flushing the nvram to disk. the array has no way to disable this behaviour. a well-known behaviour of ZFS is that it often issues cache flush commands to storage in order to ensure data

Hi, When I connect to a Cisco router and issue the show ip interface command, the output is similar as follows: Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Ethernet0/0 192.168.12.1 YES NVRAM up up Serial0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down Ethernet0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down

On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > Hi guys. > > I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: > > ? <os> > ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> > ??? <loader readonly='yes' secure='yes' >

On 11/04/2023 09:13, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: >> Hi guys. >> >> I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: >> >> ? <os> >> ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> >> ??? <loader readonly='yes'

Apologies if this has been gone over, but I believe I have checked the intertubes more than a bit..... I am using libvirt and have vms booting under an OVMF.fd to use an efi firmware. I can create vms, linux ubuntu, and they will boot up. However, everytime I reboot am I dropped into the default efi shell provide by the tianocore build. Then I must walk the FS to the booting efi app and run, in

Hi guys. I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: ? <os> ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> ??? <loader readonly='yes' secure='yes' type='pflash'>/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd</loader> <nvram>/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/nvram/ubusrv1_VARS.fd</nvram>

Thanks VERY MUCH for all the info and help! Apologies for the extreme delay. I got distracted by other threads that forced out this work to later date. Also some frustration as well. ;) I completely missed this update. Apologies and thanks Will be diving back into this shortly! On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/21/16 19:53, jsl6uy js16uy

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 13:39:17 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > > > On 11/04/2023 09:13, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > > > Hi guys. > > > > > > I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: > > > > > > ? <os> > > > ??? <type arch='x86_64'

On Friday, 2 November 2018 16:05:04 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > diff --git a/common/utils/libxml2-writer-macros.h b/common/utils/libxml2-writer-macros.h > index d74dcd465..a99b245bb 100644 > --- a/common/utils/libxml2-writer-macros.h > +++ b/common/utils/libxml2-writer-macros.h > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ > * > * which produces C<<< <name>text</name>

I've got a filesystem-based JBOD setup. During testing, I failed out one of the drives and tried to access the filesystem on it. Here are the results I got: stat /disk succeeds open /disk for reading succeeds readdir (getdents) for /disk fails EIO open /disk/noexist for reading fails ENOENT open /disk/noexist for writing