Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "htree in 2.6.0-test11"
2003 Jun 12
1
htree in RedHat.
Hi,
Someone knows if the htree patch is applied in the last kernel for RedHat 8
(kernel-2.4.20-18.8) for the ext2/ext3 filesystems ?
Greetings.
---
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
carles@unlimitedmail.org
http://www.unlimitedmail.net/
---
2003 Mar 08
3
Updated 2.4 htree patches available for 2.4.21rc5
I've backported all of the bugfixes to the 2.5 dxdir/htree patches to
2.4, and have created a new set of patches for Linux 2.4.21rc5. At this
point it *looks* like we've fixed all of the htree bugs that people have
reported, including the brelse bug, the memory leak bugs, and the NFS
compatibility problems.
I've done *very* light testing, and things seem to work, but I'm now
2002 Oct 07
9
FS corruption; HTREE-related?
Over the last two days we've been seeing a fair bit of this:
----
# ls -laR > /dev/null
...
ls: ./server2/b/user/bxyz/392.: Input/output error
----
This is with the latest htree patches applied to 2.4.19, and latest
e2fsprogs-test, on a dual AMD system, with 5x73GB SCSI drives on a
MegaRAID controller. We're using the gcc 2.96 that comes with RH7.3.
esfsck shows "Inodes that
2003 Jul 15
1
HTREE on 2.6.0-test1?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Have *ALL* the filesystem corruption issues that plague(d?) HTREE on 2.4.x
cleaned up for 2.6? I believe they have, but before I enable this feature
again, I'd like to be sure. Thanks.
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.homeip.net && http://www.linux-sxs.org
A day without sunshine
2003 Dec 17
1
htree stabilitity and performance issues
Guys,
I have recently applied the latest 2.4 htree patch on a heavily loaded
nfs server.
The nfs server serves around four very busy clients that deliver email
in maildir format and pop3/imap clients.
Being maildir I presumed that the htree patch would improve performance
- but I was wrong.
Load on the server went up by around 25-40%. After 3-4 hours of heavy
use the clients load went up to
2003 Mar 13
6
Updated 2.4 htree patches available for 2.4.21-pre5
There's a new set of ext2/3 patches for 2.4.21-pre5 available at:
http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/extfs-update-2.4.21pre5-2
and in broken out form at:
http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/broken-out-2.4.21pre5-2
New to this patch set include:
* A kludge to help htree work well with Linux's NFS implementation
* Allow the orlov allocator to be disabled via a
2002 Oct 23
1
htree for ext3 home page.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Is there any home page for the htree for ext3 project ?
Any place where I can follow the status of the project and download the last
patch versions ?
Greetings.
- ---
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
carles@descom.es
Descom Consulting
Telf: +34 965861024
Fax: +34 965861024
http://www.descom.es/
- ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
2002 Aug 21
1
Ext3 indexed directory extension.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Searching in the ext3 filesystem mailing list I have seen that there is an
indexed directory extension for it.
Is this extension stable code ?
Has anyone test it ?
How may I obtain and install it ?
Is it available in any of the last kernel releases ?
Greetings.
- ---
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
carles@descom.es
Descom Consulting
Telf: +34
2002 Oct 01
3
how often to 'fsck -D' ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
subject about says it all. should this only be done once per device or
periodically? thanks!
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org
Illiterate? Write for help!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
2002 Sep 22
1
htree 2.4.19-dxdir patch
Hi there,
: without index mount:
root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 20000
real 1m10.501s
user 0m0.240s
sys 1m8.590s
root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 100000
real 32m55.929s
user 0m1.890s
sys 32m2.500s
: with index mount:
root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 20000
real 1m8.428s
user 0m0.350s
sys 1m6.780s
root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles
2001 Jan 29
2
weirdness on powerfail
I had a power-fail this morning, and when I rebooted, /etc/rc.d/rc.boot
issued a 'mount -n -o remount,ro /' and then a 'fsck -A -V -a -C'. The
fsck failed on my root partition. I know why it failed. It called
fsck.ext2 . My root poartition is ext3. My question is, why did it call
fsck.ext2? Another question, why was it checked at all? My /etc/fstab
contains:
/dev/hda1 / ext3
2001 Jun 07
2
another silly question
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If ext3 is compiled in, how can you tell which version it is? For example,
how can I log into the systems I admin and tell if they are ext3 6b or 7a?
- --
Douglas J. Hunley (Linux User #174778)
http://hunley.homeip.net/ http://linux.nf/
Adults are just kids who owe money.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For
2000 Dec 15
2
RFC: ext3 ability to syslog actions
Forgive me if this has been discussed. I'm new to the list and couldn't
find any list archives or a FAQ or anything similiar. (Is there
anything?)
I've just today installed ext3 .5d in my machine. All drives (including
'/'). I like it! However, I'm curious about what it's doing. I don't
know C, so telling me to read source won't help. I'm wondering if it
2003 Dec 15
0
htree in 2.4.23
Hi All,
Is http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/ext3-dxdir/patch-ext3-dxdir-2.4.21rc5
the latest htree patch for 2.4 or should I be using bitkeeper to extract
the patch?
2002 Sep 05
1
What happens with the indexed directory patch ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm trying to install the htree indexed directory patch to my RedHat
kernel-source-2.4.18-10, but it seems that doesn't go.
First I tried the ext3 patch (I have sent some emails to this list telling the
problems I had with it).
Now I have just test the ext2 patch.
I get it from:
http://people.nl.linux.org/~phillips/htree/htree-2.4.18-2
2002 Oct 21
3
htree questions
I decided that I would try out 2.5.44, and I noticed that htree was
merged. If I don't do the tune2fs -O dir_index, and e2fsck -D, the
(exisintg) fs won't use htree, right? Once I do the tune2fs and e2fsck,
will I still be able to go back to a non-htree kernel if needed? (Will
a htree-ized fs work on a non-htree kernel?) I'm guessing that it
won't. I've seen a 2.4 htree
2003 Apr 04
1
2.4.20 & htree
Apologies for the newbie question:
I have a (stock) 2.4.20 build (*not* -ac), and I'm trying to work with
large ext3 directories. By large, I mean 160,000 files per directory.
(Yes, I know it would be better in nested directories but such is
life).
I feel htree would benefit me. Having upgraded from an earlier version
of 2.4, I don't see any change, and close reading of the 2.4 changelog
2000 Dec 16
1
ordered data mode?
I managed to install 0.5d today. Got all 3 of my mounts converted (even
'/' though it was a pain in the ass). Now on boot, I see:
mounted /dev/hda1 on /
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode
and the exact same thing for /dev/hda3 and /dev/hdb1. they all come up
and appear to be working. so is this normal? Or did I manage to screw up
somewhere?
--
Douglas J. Hunley (Linux User
2003 Jun 19
2
htree and nfs benchmarks
Well here is what I got from testing htree with NFS.
http://labs.zianet.com/benchmarks_html/postmark_benchmarks_NFS_100_htree.html
It looks like htree improves performance when the storage device is
local(as per
my previous post) but it looks like htree degrades performance when used
in conjunction
with NFS. I am going to try it with gigabit ethernet when I get the
time to see if
maybe I am
2003 Jun 18
3
ext3 2.4.21 htree tests
Hi,
Just thought I'd share some test results of mine in case anyone is
interested.
Basically the tests are siumulating what our product does with files -
although the tests do it a lot quicker (not as many files though).
The test is to create 1 million files (each containing the text of the
file number) spread over a number of directories. The files are then
removed in the same manner as