similar to: smbmount problem?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "smbmount problem?"

2014 Jun 23
2
Wheezy Dovecot workarounds
Hi all, In switching from Ubuntu to Debian Wheezy (7.5 64bit, network install), I'm finding some surprises in getting Dovecot to work. PROBLEM: As installed, the package manager doesn't give you the dovecot executable. WORKAROUND: To install the dovecot executable, you need to follow these instructions: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/DebianStable PROBLEM: Even when you install
2001 Mar 13
1
Oddities
I've just started digging into an odd problem. I hope this is the right forum, if not, please point me to the correct one. Trying to summarize a bit: We're running Samba 2.0.0 on a solaris 2.6 server. There are 3 users, A, B and C. User A, the admin, can log in just fine and poke all around the samba shares she has access to. User B, normal user, can't connect, gets denied
2020 Apr 16
0
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
This syntax is already implemented in the {purrr} package, more or less -- you need to add a tilde before your function call for it to work exactly as written: purrr::map_dbl(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), ~ summary(lm(wt ~ mpg, .))$r.squared) is equivalent to sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), function(d) summary(lm(mpg ~ wt, d))$r.squared) Seems like using this package is probably an easier
2020 Apr 16
0
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Serguei, > On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic modification of FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the anonymous function is
2020 Apr 16
0
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Passing in a function passes not only an argument list but also an environment from which to get free variables. Since your function doesn't pay attention to the environment you get things like the following. > wsapply(list(1,2:3), paste(., ":", deparse(s))) [[1]] [1] "1 : paste(., \":\", deparse(s))" [[2]] [1] "2 : paste(., \":\",
2020 Apr 16
2
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
I'm sure this exists elsewhere, but, as a trade-off, could you achieve what you want with a separate helper function F(expr) that constructs the function you want to pass to [lsv]apply()? Something that would allow you to write: sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), F(summary(lm(mpg ~ wt,.))$r.squared)) Such an F() function would apply elsewhere too. /Henrik On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:30 AM
2018 Jun 21
2
NVPTX - Reordering load instructions
We already have a pass that vectorizes loads and stores in nvptx and amdgpu. Not at my laptop, I forget the exact filename, but it's called load-store vectorizer. I think the question is, why is LSV not vectorizing this code? I think the answer is, llvm can't tell that the loads are aligned. Ptxas can, but only because it's (apparently) doing vectorization *after* it reesolves the
2020 Apr 16
0
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Sergei, the main problem that I was pointing out is is that there is no way you can introduce the new syntax without breaking the old one. The expression is evaluated to obtain a function, so by definition using anything that results in a valid expression for your syntax will break. E.g., using sapply(x, (foo)) is completely valid so you can't just change the evaluation of the expression to
1999 Jun 18
1
How to add an Domain Admin to the local Admin group
Hi Samba User Group Maybe that's a stupid question, however i have a severe problem with that. I'm running samba 2.0.4b on suse linux 6.1 and windows nt4 sp4, german version. I need the domain admin to be a member of the local admin group, If I log into the local domain as admin I cannot add the domain admin to the local admin group, because of miising privledges in the domain. If I log
2020 Apr 19
0
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
You can get pretty close to that already using fn$ in the gsubfn package: > library(gsubfn) > fn$sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), x ~ summary(lm(mpg ~ wt, x))$r.squared) 4 6 8 0.5086326 0.4645102 0.4229655 It is not specific to sapply but rather fn$ can preface most functions. If the only free variables are the arguments to the function then you can omit the left
2006 Aug 26
1
tripplite_usb
Is it me, or is my USB not being recognized properly? tipper nut # ./tripplite_usb -DDD -u root -a tipper -x vendor=09AE Network UPS Tools - Tripp Lite OMNIVS and SMARTPRO driver 0.6 (2.0.4) Warning: This is an experimental driver. Some features may not function correctly. debug level is '3' Checking device (0000/0000) (002/001) - VendorID: 0000 - ProductID: 0000 - Manufacturer: Linux
2020 Apr 16
2
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Simon, Thanks for replying. In what follows I won't try to argue (I understood that you find this a bad idea) but I would like to make clearer some of your point for me (and may be for others). Le 16/04/2020 ? 16:48, Simon Urbanek a ?crit?: > Serguei, >> On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >> wrote: Hi, I would like to make a
2020 Apr 16
6
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Hi, I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic modification of FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an example. With this new feature, the following call
2020 Apr 20
1
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Le 19/04/2020 ? 20:46, Gabor Grothendieck a ?crit?: > You can get pretty close to that already using fn$ in the gsubfn package: >> library(gsubfn) fn$sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), x ~ >> summary(lm(mpg ~ wt, x))$r.squared) > 4 6 8 0.5086326 0.4645102 0.4229655 Right, I thought about similar syntax but this implementation has similar flaws pointed by Simon, i.e. it reduces
2020 Apr 17
2
suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply()
Thanks Simon, Now, I see better your argument. Le 16/04/2020 ? 22:48, Simon Urbanek a ?crit?: > ... I'm not arguing against the principle, I'm arguing about your > particular proposal as it is inconsistent and not general. This sounds promising for me. May be in a (new?) future, R core will come with a correct proposal for this principle? Meanwhile, to avoid substitute(),
2006 Apr 04
0
Links for authenticated users on public pages.
I made an authentication system and I''m uncertain of the best way to go about hiding links on public pages meant for authenticated users (this is also different for people with various privledges but this isn''t the problem). I only know two ways to go about this: create a helper file and write a seperate authorization piece that verifies the user to show the URL and add
2009 Jan 27
0
Swat access question
Hi All, I'm a new user to Samba and I'm just having trouble with one or two things. I've been able to sort most of them out myself but I was wondering how can you get full access to Swat. Obviously the root user gets all the access requiremnts but my own unix user only gets the Samba Documentation screen within Swat. I have tried adding my user id into admin users but this
2003 Mar 19
1
Dotlocking doesn't work?
A Debian developer had this to say: > >> Files in the above dir are group mail, and the dir is group mail. However, > > > all binaries in /usr/lib/dovecot are root/root. I have set them all to g+s, > > > and group mail, and now the imap process can lock the INBOX. > > > > > imap should be the only one that needs to be setgid mail. > > Actually,
2003 May 08
2
Why a PDC?
At my office there's talk of moving from a "WorkGroup" currently hosted through samba to a Domain, possibly hosted through samba. Anyone got a definitive "why we should or should not rip out the existing, working workgroup to put in a domain?" :wq! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris | PGP Key
2003 May 01
2
no wins registering?
I have multiple samba servers. smb1 is my master, smb2 is a slave. My master has this: name resolve order=wins hosts bcast # wins server=127.0.0.1 wins support=yes The Slave has this: name resolve order=wins hosts bcast # wins server=<IP OF Master> wins support=no After 24 hours the Master forgets who the slave is. If I restart the slave he notifies the master who