similar to: solved roaming profiles Samba 2.2.3a and W2K SP2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "solved roaming profiles Samba 2.2.3a and W2K SP2"

2002 Mar 07
1
Antwort: roaming profiles Samba 2.2.3a and W2K SP2
Hi Rene, I have found this in the "whats new" for Samba 2.2.3 Added/changed parameters. ------------------------- ... nt acl support This parameter has been changed to a per-share option, and is very useful in enabling Windows 2000 SP2 to load/save profiles from a Samba share. ... Maybe it helps! Regards, Thomas Bitte antworten an <rene.lenga@atacama.de> Gesendet von:
2002 Mar 07
1
roaming profiles Samba 2.2.3a and W2K SP2
Hello samba-insiders, we have a WinNT 4.0 SP5 PDC and our samba 2.2.3a is member of the domain. The roaming profiles of our clients stored on the samba 2.2.3a server. All seams to be perfect but clients with W2K SP2 cannot use there roaming profiles. ---> "Access Denyed" is the W2K error message. But if the same user loggs on on a client machine with W2K SP1 all things are ok. In
2002 Mar 05
2
W2K Sp2 in NT4 domain and roaming profiles on samba 2.2.3a
Hello samba-insiders, we have a WinNT 4.0 SP5 PDC and our samba 2.2.3a is member of the domain. The roaming profiles of our clients stored on the samba 2.2.3a server. All seams to be perfect but only clients with W2K SP2 cannot use there roaming profiles. ---> "Access Denyed" is the W2K errro message. But if the same user loggs on on a client machine with W2K SP1 all things are ok.
2002 Jul 18
1
Linux Client
> Message: 9 > From: Sylvestre Taburet <sylvestre.taburet@free.fr> > Reply-To: sylvestre.taburet@free.fr > Organization: @telier > To: Joel Hammer <Joel@HammersHome.com>, > =?iso-8859-1?q?Fr=E9d=E9ric=20SCHWIEN?= <fred@igtech.fr>, > samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux Client > Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:23:25 +0200 > > Le Mercredi
2012 May 31
2
Loop question
Hello, I have a dataframe (Lx) with 5 Lb, and 5 Lw variables. I want to create several variables according to the loop presented below (data attached). Lx <- read.csv("Lx.csv", header=T, sep=",") for (i in 1:20) { Lx$sb1[i] <- Lx$Lb1[i+1]/Lx$Lb1[i] Lx$sb2[i] <- Lx$Lb2[i+1]/Lx$Lb2[i] Lx$sb3[i] <- Lx$Lb3[i+1]/Lx$Lb3[i] Lx$sb4[i] <-
2002 Jun 27
0
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHH ==> winbind and pam, work please ! !
I used the .tar.gz file Philippe Dhont -----Original Message----- From: Sylvestre Taburet [mailto:staburet@mandrakesoft.com] Sent: donderdag 27 juni 2002 14:11 To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHH ==> winbind and pam, work please !! Le Jeudi 27 Juin 2002 13:56, Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) a ?crit : > I have a big problem and i'm getting crazy time by
2002 Oct 16
1
Samba 2.2.6rc4 RPMS released for Mandrake Linux 8.2 and 9.0
Hi! As usual, get them at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~staburet/freshsamba or http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/samba Get the SRPM at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~staburet/SRPMS Cheers, Sly -- Sylvestre Taburet - Project Manager - 1024D/030E1B7E Mandrakesoft S.A. - 43, rue d'Aboukir, 75002 Paris - FRANCE +33 (0) 1 40 41 00 41 - http://www.mandrakelinux.com
2001 Nov 30
1
Win98SE to Samba 2.0.10 Problems
Thanks for the answers so far but I haven't been able to come up with an solution yet :( Some new info (see bottom of email for history): 1. I upgraded to 2.0.10 on my Mandrake 8.0, no change to the transfer problem. 2. I attempted to ftp a file from the Win 98SE PC to my Samba Server, didn't work. So I can assume that it is not specifically Samba problem. 3. I have changed the NIC cards
2002 Nov 12
0
Newbie question Samba/Win XP/printing
Hi - I am trying to set up a samba server on our solaris 2.8 box, which is to be used primarily for printing in the first instance. My smb.conf file is as follows: [global] comment = Music Samba %v server string = Music Samba %v (%h) workgroup = MUSIC netbios name = VIXEN log level = 2 log file = /usr/localhost/samba/var/samba.log.%m max log size = 2000 debug timestamp
2002 Oct 17
0
Samba 2.2.6 (final) RPMS released for Mandrake Linux 8.0, 8.1, 8.2 and 9.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@cae.co.za> and myself <staburet@mandrakesoft.com> are proud to present to you the latest RPMs for samba-2.2.6, compiled for Mandrake Linux 8.0, 8.1, 8.2 and 9.0 platforms, with or without LDAP. We would like to thank the samba team for their great work on the 2.2.X versions of samba, and salute the
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
# Enabling internationalization: # you can match a Windows code page with a UNIX character set. # Windows: 437 (US), 737 (GREEK), 850 (Latin1 - Western European), # 852 (Eastern Eu.), 861 (Icelandic), 932 (Cyrillic - Russian), # 936 (Japanese - Shift-JIS), 936 (Simpl. Chinese), 949 (Korean Hangul), # 950 (Trad. Chin.). # UNIX: ISO8859-1 (Western European), ISO8859-2 (Eastern Eu.), # ISO8859-5
2003 Nov 07
2
Implemented "--exclude-old" in rsync
Hi, I'm using rsync to keep several file servers in sync. Uploads to the data can be placed at any time on any server. I'm using the extended N-way backup, following the example from the two way backup in the FAQ: rsync --archive --update rsync::first/files files (on second, third) rsync --archive --update rsync::second/files files (on first, third) rsync --archive --update
2006 Feb 03
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3479] New: Request: timestamps in --log-format
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3479 Summary: Request: timestamps in --log-format Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: yair.lenga@citigroup.com
2006 Apr 24
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3719] New: Improved "--update" logic
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3719 Summary: Improved "--update" logic Product: rsync Version: 2.6.5 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: yair.lenga@citigroup.com
2006 Apr 24
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3718] New: RSync should verify permission/time before commiting a change
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3718 Summary: RSync should verify permission/time before commiting a change Product: rsync Version: 2.6.5 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2003 Mar 06
3
smbclient to access limited networks?
I am new to this ML and am sorry if this question has been answered already. I have a firewall router running Linux having two Ethernet ports (i.e. access to two networks) for INTRANET and INTERNET. This firewall needs to run smbclient to access a share on a Win2K host in the INTRANET. Looking into the Linux kernel message log, I found smbclient is broadcasting NetBIOS name service queries to
2002 Dec 03
2
Samba SWAT 2.2.7 Doesn't Work in Redhat8.0?
Hello All Samba-list Members, I have installed a Samba 2.2.7, the samba-latest.tar.gz, as a PDC on a Redhat8.0 GNU/Linux server. ( Of course, I first uninstalled the original samba that came with the Redhat installation CDs by rpm -e samba*.) The installation was successful. Then I modified /etc/services and /etc/xinetd.d/swat as suggested in the installation document uncompressed from
2002 Mar 06
3
OT(?): Poll: how big is your environment
Hi, just being nosey :) How big is your environment? Especially of interest: number of printers configured on the samba server(s), and what architecture/OS the samba server is running on... bye, M.Homann Number of printers (on the single server which has the most printers): [ ] < 5 [ ] < 10 [ ] < 25 [ ] < 50 [ ] > 50 Printer driver system for clients [ ] old system
2002 Jul 17
1
m$ briefcase / access question
Hi all, I've just realised Samba doesn't appear to support M$ Briefcases, which is a bit of a shame as I've just designed an Access Database system that needs to replicate between Servers on five sites, and we've just converted the client's NT Servers to Linux Samba Servers.... (now, finally, things work properly!!) So, presuming there is a God up there somewhere.... can
2003 Mar 12
2
Is there a way?
Is there a way to make clients not see "hidden" shares? Like we have an "I:" drive, but it's actually a "Common-Share"... Thoughts? Joel