similar to: File system corruption

... ok, I may be going about this the wrong way, or perhaps, a less efficient way than is optimal, but I would like to test a little bit of AJAX on one of my web pages. When I test this by hand, I bring up the page which shows a select box, I select an item from the drop down list, see another select box show up, go back to the first select box, select a different item, and see something

I have the following: @lot = Lot.find(params[:id]) part_nums = Part.all(:conditions => ["id <> ?", @lot.part.id]) I guess I should mention that Lot :belongs_to => :part I was looking at the log following the execution of these two statements and I saw something like this: Lot Load (0.4ms) SELECT * FROM "lots" WHERE ("lots"."id" = 13) Part

I have a PHP application with the following in one of the "views": <input type="button" onClick="newAlt()" value=" + "></nobr> The JavaScript for "newAlt()" is: // using DOM create new input box for alternate part function newAlt() { var html = "<input style=''background-color:#FFFFCC'' "; html +=

Dear Sir or Madam, Has anyone seen a error message like the following? rsync: recv_generator: mkdir "/home/kmiller/briefcase/1205275" failed: Too many links (31) rsync: stat "/home/kmiller/briefcase/1205275" failed: No such file or directory (2) As far as I can tell, I am not using any symlinks or hardlinks. Please find below a reasonably complete bug report. Please let

I know the scaffold generator is really only useful for beginners and/or very the preliminary state of a project, but I find that I use it a lot (especially, since I am still a beginner). There are a couple of things I find myself tweaking (or wanting to tweak, but never getting around to tweaking) each time I generate a new scaffold: 1) Change the layout from blah.html.erb to

Box with Redhat 7.1 and kernel 2.4.20 has a hardware RAID (about 750 gigs data) attached via an Adaptec 29160 LP card... I began seeing numerous SCSI errors in my logs for our external hardware RAID and input/output errors on test attempts to copy files via cp. Rebooted and immediately saw the errors as the disk was initially accessed by the Adaptec driver. The RAID controller did not

On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> This indicated that a bad sector on the underlying disk system might >> be the source of the problem. The guests were all shutdown, a >> /forcefsck file was created on the host system, and the host system >> remotely restarted. > > fsck's not good at finding

hallo! I'm trying to place a file coming from a samba share into my local briefcase on my win98/ME machines. it works with the same share on my winNT box. when I move the file from the mounted volume to the briefcase I don't get any error messages, but the file doesn't show up in the briefcase?! my setup: local PC with winME, briefcase on desktop, samba (userlevel-)share mounted as

Hi, I have a Samba 2.2.3a-6 server running on top of Debian Woody. There are two things I still have problems with. Number one is case mangling. I have set "mangle case = Yes" in [global] and left all other options related to case at their default and it works to some extent. But for example I cannot rename "whatever.txt" to "WhatEver.txt". The way it works is

Hello everyone... I have been using Samba v1.9.16p11 for a little while now and I just noticed that when I create a Windows 95 Briefcase on a Samba drive it appears as a folder (directory). This also happens when I move a briefcase created on a local drive to the network. I admit a small degree of ignorance here because I do not have an NT box to test the setup with so I do not know if this is

Hi, I've a samba 3.0.24 server running in a debian "alike" OS with a (Open)LDAP backend and I'm having the following problem: I have LDAP users that belong to more than one (POSIX) group. For instance, I have a user2 that belongs to group "users" and "grupo2" and I have a share with the following ACL settings: getfacl /home/shares/share1/ getfacl: Removing

I can't seem to find the answer to this question via web search... I changed some hardware on a server, and upon powering it back on, got the "/dev/xxx has gone 40 days without being check, check forced" message. Now it's running fsck on a huge (2 TB) ext3 filesystem (5400 RPM drives no less). How can I stop this in-progress check? Ctrl-C doesn't seem to have any effect.

character set = iso8859-1 client code page = 850 Through win9x I save a file, whose filename contains characters as: ? ? ? ? ?, on a samba share. I can see those filenames (on a samba share) ok through win9x explorer. I can see those filenames ok through ls on linux. If I open one of those file, and then look at locked files with smbstatus, they are showed with a LF in place of the localized

On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: > On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> >> On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >>> >>> fsck's not good at finding disk errors, it finds filesystem errors. >> >> If not fsck then what? > > badblocks(8). And I definitely will

I get up around 0630, u can come anytime after that. I want to hit the range that morning but if I KNEW when you are arriving, I could plan around that... > On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: >>> On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at

Is there a way to successfully create a working Briefcase on Samba shares? When I create one in a Samba share, it has a regular folder icon with a desktop.ini file in it. Openning it reveals a plain folder rather than the usual Briefcase applet. When I create one on a Windows NT network share it works fine, but all our big filesystems are unix-based Samba shares rather than NT shares. -Ernie

On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > > On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >> >> fsck's not good at finding disk errors, it finds filesystem errors. > > If not fsck then what? badblocks(8).

On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: >> On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >>>> >>>> fsck's not good at finding disk

Hello After compiling and booting a RH 8.0 box with a 2.4.19 vanilla kernel i've started to experience some problems on my /home partition, (i/o errors on 2 files). After rebooting the machine failed the to mount /home and dropped me in the recovery shell. The fsck is still running after 9 hours. The system is a dual athlon MP with 1Gb ram and ASUS MB. the /home patrition is mounted on 3 120

[sorry if this isn't threaded right... I just subscribed] Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > There are two reasons for the reserve. One is to reserve space on the > partition containing /var and /etc for log files, etc. The other is > to avoid the performance degredation when the last 5-10% of the disk > space is used. (BSD actually reserves 10% by default.) Given that > the