similar to: raid 0 recovery.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "raid 0 recovery."

2004 Feb 04
0
RAID 0 Problems - resubmission as subsriber
Can some one help me with a ext3 file sys problem?? I have a raid 0 array that was not shut down properly due to bad contacts in a removable drive bay. It consists of two 80Gb drives. I can create /dev/md0 ok. but if fails during mount. When I run: fsck -n /dev/md0 it reports the following: fsck 1.32 e2fsck 1.32 SuperBlock has a bad ext3 journal (inode 8) clear? no fsck.ext2: illegal inode
2003 Aug 18
2
another seriously corrupt ext3 -- pesky journal
Hi Ted and all, I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have to describe my problem in some detail. The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms are very similar to what Eddy described
2012 Oct 25
2
fsck.ext4 problem 64bit
Hi All, Trying to run fsck on a local linux raid partition gave the following. [root at ... /]# fsck.ext4 /dev/md0 e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) /dev/md0 has unsupported feature(s): 64bit e2fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! Odd as the server is 64bit running latest kernel and using latest "e2fsprogs.x86_64". Any ideas awould be much appreciated. Cheers Steve k
2003 Mar 20
0
X-Post from Linux-RAID [Re: I just trashed my RAID5 array - recovery possible?]
Hi, originally I posted this to linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, but I guess there are chances that someone in here might comment on it as well. TIA. * Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> [2003-03-20 10:58]: > On Thursday March 20, lists@schlich.org wrote: > > > > And when I try to mount the array: > > --8<-- > > EXT3-fs error (device md(9,1)):
2003 Aug 06
2
Re: ext3 badness in 2.6.0-test2
On Monday August 4, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> wrote: > > > > I came back this morning and found: > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted >
2008 Jan 18
1
Recover lost data from LVM RAID1
Guys, The other day while working on my old workstation it get frozen and after reboot I lost almost all data unexpectedly. I have a RAID1 configuration with LVM. 2 IDE HDDs. md0 .. store /boot (100MB) -------------------------- /dev/hda2 /dev/hdd1 md1 .. store / (26GB) /dev/hda3 /dev/hdd2 The only info that still rest in was that, that I restore after the fresh install. It seems that the
2006 Jan 19
3
ext3 fs errors 3T fs
Hello, I looked through the archives a bit and could not find anything relevant, if you know otherwise please point me in the right direction. I have a ~3T ext3 filesystem on linux software raid that had been behaving corectly for sometime. Not to long ago it gave the following error after trying to mount it: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md0, or too many
2010 May 21
1
Grub Error 22; no Windows
Hello, I have a GridEngine setup with 5 subnodes and two RAIDS attached. I backed up the OS drive - 120GB - to an external hard drive - 500GB - using ddrescue. The OS drive is partitioned as: sda1 has the OS and is about 7 GB sda2 has /var and is about 4 GB sda3 has swap and is about 1 GB After backing up, there were 4KB of errors, but all at the end of the disk around 118GB. This used to be
2002 Sep 20
2
RAID1 + Ext3 + Automatic Power Resets
I am testing EXT3 as a filesystem for a server whose power supply is failure prone. In order to do the test, I have a lever that I can control from PC1 that can press the reset button on PC2. PC2's reset button is automatically pressed once every 120 seconds (the boot sequence on PC2 takes 80 seconds). While PC2 is booted, PC1 directs email and web requests at PC2, so that the PC2 disks are
2006 Jun 24
3
recover data from linear raid
Hello, I had a scientific linux 3.0.4 system (rhel compatible), with 3 ide disks, one for / and two others in linear raid (250 gb and 300 gb each). This system was obsoleted so i move the raid disks to a new scientific linux 3.0.7 installation. However, the raid array was not detected ( I put the disks on the same channels and same master/lsave setup as in the previous setup). In fact
2010 Jun 14
3
Diagnosing some OCFS2 error messages
Hello. I am experimenting with OCFS2 on Suse Linux Enterprise Server 11 Service Pack 1. I am performing various stress tests. My current exercise involves writing to files using a shared-writable mmap() from two nodes. (Each node mmaps and writes to different files; I am not trying to access the same file from multiple nodes.) Both nodes are logging messages like these: [94355.116255]
2001 Nov 11
2
Software RAID and ext3 problem
Hi, I'm having a problem with ext3 on my system. I'm running 2.4.13 with the appropiate ext3 patch and a software raid array with paritiions as shown below: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md5 939M 237M 654M 27% / /dev/md0 91M 22M 65M 25% /boot /dev/md6 277M 8.1M 254M 4% /tmp /dev/md7 1.8G 1.3G
2008 Jan 18
1
HowTo Recover Lost Data from LVM RAID1 ?
Guys, The other day while working on my old workstation it got frozen and after reboot I lost almost all data unexpectedly. I have a RAID1 configuration with LVM. 2 IDE HDDs. md0 .. store /boot (100MB) -------------------------- /dev/hda2 /dev/hdd1 md1 .. store / (26GB) -------------------------- /dev/hda3 /dev/hdd2 The only info that still rest in was that, that I restore after the fresh
2010 Jul 21
4
Fsck on mdraid array
Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck everything. But I cannot. The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot, /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5. So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file systems, and try to run fsck -y /dev/md0 fsck -y /dev/md1 fsck -y /dev/md2 For each try I get an error message:
2005 Apr 09
3
short read while checking ext3 journal
My UPS failed and my server took an 'unscheduled outage' a few weeks ago. The only casualty appears to be a volume I used for backup. I usually maintain data on multiple hard disks, but in this case I errantly had some data (of marginal value) on this file system. At this point, the data is not worth enough for me to send the drive out for data recovery, but it's worth enough to
2002 Feb 28
5
Problems with ext3 fs
Hi, Apologies, this is going to be quite long - I'm going to provide as much info as possible. I'm running a system with ext3 fs on software RAID. The RAID set-up is as shown below: jlm@nijinsky:~$ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] read_ahead 1024 sectors md0 : active raid1 hdc1[1] hda1[0] 96256 blocks [2/2] [UU] md5 : active raid1 hdk1[1] hde1[0]
2005 Oct 17
0
Centos 4.1 Boot Problem on ML570 with Compag 5300 Storage Array Raid Controller
Hello All, Hardware: HP ML570 2G Ram Dual 2.8G procs Compaq 5300 Smart Array Controller Software: Centos 4.1 I yum-med a server last week and rebooted it. When it came up, it stopped. Looking at the console, I got: ---snip Setting Hostname: OK Checking root filesystem: /dev/cciss/c0d0p10 is mounted, e2fsck cannot continue, aborting failed *** an error occurred during the file system check
2010 Jan 20
3
Slow fsck on adaptec SAS/SATA raid
I'm trying to do an fsck on an ext3 partition but I'm seeing abysmally slow disk throughput; monitoring with "dstat" (like vmstat) shows ~1200-1500KB/s throughput to the disks. Even with 24hrs of fsck-ing I only get ~3% (still in pass1). The filesystem is ext3 running "e2fsck -C0 /dev/sda3" and about 3.7TB on an x86_64-based system with 4GB RAM. e2fsprogs is 1.41.9.
2013 Nov 22
0
centos4.8 system container not working on fedora 19 machine
Hi All, I am trying to evaluate whether centos-4.8 system container work on Fedora-19 machine or not. Host machine : Fedora 19 Guest (LXC container) : CentOS4 .8 For creation of of container i followed following steps, 1. Installed libvirt packages on fedora19 2. For installation of rootfs using yum, I have created the LOCAL YUM REPO using CentOS-4.8 ISO files
2003 Apr 17
1
Odd error: Physical size does not match superblock size
Hello, I had something interesting happen on a RH8 ext3 system I setup.I am at a loss to understand what happened. Info: This system has two IDE disks, partitioned identically, and the largest partition on each (/dev/hda3 and /dev/hdb3, 96GB each) was mirrored in a linux software RAID-1 configuration. It was running fine for many months. Then I updated the kernel and needed to reboot accordingly.