similar to: PATCH - smbd/trans2.c to support writing to Unix named pipes(FIFO)

Just a couple of quick fixes for trans2.c and README in samba-2.2.3a. --- source/smbd/trans2.c.old Tue Feb 5 14:37:55 2002 +++ source/smbd/trans2.c Wed Feb 20 10:26:16 2002 @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ if(!S_ISLNK(sbuf.st_mode)) return(UNIXERROR(ERRSRV,ERRbadlink)); #else - return(UNIXERROR(ERRDOS,ErrNotALink)); +

############################# In German : Hallo, gibt es da Jemanden der mir den folgenden Text vielleicht ein bischen besser erkl?ren kann? Habe dies aus dem Samba Developers Guide. Warum mach ich das nun? Ich habe ein Problem: Ich will das jedes mal wenn ein User versucht einen Ordner in der Freigabe zu verschieben oder umzubenenner, der nicht leer ist, eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Client

Hello! I have compiled samba v2.2.9 without ACL support and when I test skel vfs module I have encountered internal errors (SIGSEGV in child processes). Consider the file source/samba/vfs.c: struct vfs_ops default_vfs_ops = { ... /* POSIX ACL operations. */ #if defined(HAVE_NO_ACLS) NULL, NULL, #else vfswrap_chmod_acl, vfswrap_fchmod_acl, #endif ... }; As

I just brought up samba 2.0.5a in a Solaris 2.6 environment. Smooth effort with no visible problems in CVS download, configuration, and make but attempts to reference data after connection yield this error. Has anyone seen this before and can point me in the right direction to to address? Thanks Andy [1999/07/31 15:14:30, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(521) agibson (209.31.144.167) connect

agibson@nova.org wrote: > > I just brought up samba 2.0.5a in a Solaris 2.6 environment. Smooth > effort with no visible problems in CVS download, configuration, and > make but attempts to reference data after connection yield this > error. Has anyone seen this before and can point me in the right > direction to to address? Thanks Andy > > [1999/07/31 15:14:30, 1]

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

----- Forwarded message from Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> ----- From: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> To: samba-technical@samba.org Cc: jra@samba.org Subject: Patch to improve Samba write speeds on Linux ext3 with 3.2.x Reply-To: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> Hi all, Intel recently did some research on Samba write speeds, tested in Linux using ext3 resulting in the following

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:05PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote > the attached patch. Great catch you guys ! Thanks for taking a look, I've been busy on other stuff for the past few weeks. Let me go through the issue and proposed code *really* carefully :-). The open code can be really tricky (as you've

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> This patch finishes the MultiFS support. init_multifs gets called in the main (startup) function of ldlinux.c32, so MultiFS will be initialized automatically. init_multifs calls enable_multifs (lives in the core) to hook get_fs_info. Subsequent accesses will callback the get_fs_info living in ldlinux.c32. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.

I can?t copy some files from server to directory /adawork/softtek om AIX box I?m using AIX 5.3 with samba 2.2.7-4 Here?s mys logs from samba server _________________________________________ file log.windows-server seek_file: (FAT_ATRASO_TRANS_5_3_1_in.txt) sys_lseek failed. Error was Invalid argument [2009/08/27 13:30:59, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(94) error string = Invalid argument

Hi, I've found a problem with samba when printing from a client running win95 + DFS. The print fails with a segmentation fault. The problem is that Win95 does not return the proper file_fsp( smb_vwv0) when doing an IOCTL request.This causes the file_fsp call in reply_ioctl (smbd/reply.c) to fail cause a segmentation fault. I do not understand how samba work, but here is my working patch

Hello, I've been wondering why my no-optimization R-devel builds have been hanging during "building/updating package indices ...". I tracked it down with gdb to this line from do_basename in utils.c: while ( *(p = buf + strlen(buf) - 1) == fsp ) *p = '\0'; Now, imagine if your compiler places the variable fsp immediately before buf on the stack, and strlen(buf) is 0.

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for > forgetting this in the previous version. Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-). I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the code and realized that adding the following change made it much clearer (at least to me). diff --git

Hi, I'm hunting a bug in 3.0.x (tested on 3.0.10 and 3.0.20). Users can create and modfy files, but cannot delete them. The logs show [2005/09/21 20:48:14, 0, pid=18388, effective(4019, 412), real(4019, 0)] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767) tdb(/srv/physik.fu-berlin.de/data/.samba/cluster1-test/cache/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2005/09/21 20:48:15, 0,

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from

On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 22:28:11 -0600 Sergei Gerasenko via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba > version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core > dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm > including the stack trace below. It looks like the

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Cheerio! > -slow Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: When adding the validate_nt_acl_blob() function in [PATCH 06/12] vfs_acl_common: move the ACL blob validation to a helper function this makes some of the existing function names in debug statements incorrect. Eg. validate_nt_acl_blob()

Dear all, I have a problem with specifying the no. of knots in our function which include gam(). I last worked with this in mid September but since then I have reinstalled R and Simon Wood's library(mgcv), which he has changed since then. The statistician (and good R-coder) with whom I co-operate is now unfortunately overloaded with teaching, and I'm in the sprut of my thesis.... I

We are using SAMBA 3.6.6 on Centos 5 with the acl_tdb VFS module. Our share is backed by storage on a SAN devices that does not support ACLs or extended attributes ... so we're trying the acl_tdb module as a mechanism to support Windows ACLs. We have verified that samba has ACL support enabled, and ACL support works find if we export the share from the local EXT4 filesystem. When trying to

Hi, I have recently upgraded from Asterisk 1.2.15 to 1.4.2 and I'm experiencing trouble with rx_fax. I have followed instructions posted by Sems: http://www.sems.org/entry.asp?ENTRY_ID=197 I'm using spandsp-0.0.3pre28 and the app_rxfax and app_txfax from: http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/test-apps-asterisk-1.4/ rx_fax and tx_fax are both enabled via make