similar to: tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors.

Hello all, I'm relatively new to CentOS, but I've been using linux as my main operating system on both the desktop and server ends for the past 4 years. I currently have a PIII server with two 160GB IDE hard drives in it, in a virtual RAID 1 array. At the time of installation, the only FS choices for the largest partition, 120GB, were ext2 and ext3. I chose ext3, but now am wishing

Hi I plan to set up a big file server, something like motherboard with 4 ide ports and an additional 4 ide daughter card, a PIV proc and 512 or 1024 MB ram, a 100 or 1000 MB NIC, with 6 or 7 200 GB ide HDDs in a sigle box. I don't need lightning performance, just disk space. Of course this would be served by some linux os and samba questions (relative to samba configuration and behaviour) :

I made some tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors. The test is simple: format a partition, copy the kernel source, unmount and and do ?dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a disk surface damage and then run fsck. seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and ext3, for jfs I don't know Result: jfs: ---- total

Lo, Actualy i'm looking for documents about journalised file system, in order to be able to compare them self. I need accurate information if i want to make a good study. Thoses informations have to permit me to get answer about table like this : Features \ fs | xfs | ext3 | jfs | reiserfs | ------------------------------------------------- chattr | ? | Y | ? | ?

Hello All, I have been doing some research to find a method to increase the performance of writes to the hard drives in my servers. I am running Samba and all writes to the server hard drives are taking at least 3 to 10 times (It varies) the amount of time it took to write such files on our older Windows NT 4.0 File Server. The following information is provided to keep this issue on track...

All, There have been many requests for added kernel features that the upstream provider left out of the standard kernel. (ReiserFS, Video4Linux, Firewire support, XFS, NTFS, JFS, etc.). We want the main release CDs to contain a standard kernel for compatibility and stability reasons. CentOS is created as a clone, and it needs to be as close as possible to the upstream distro. That being said,

Optimizations by reducing the STREQ operations and do some code cleanup. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/mkfs.c | 29 +++++++++++++---------------- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/mkfs.c b/daemon/mkfs.c index a2c2366..7757623 100644 --- a/daemon/mkfs.c +++ b/daemon/mkfs.c @@ -44,13 +44,16 @@ do_mkfs_opts (const

We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near future with about 1TB of disk online. The purpose of this box will be for basic file and printer sharing needs. I am doing research on the different journaling file systems avaible in RH 7.3 and up (ext3, reiserFS, and JFS) and was wondering if anyone has had any real world experience with them (mostly reiserFS and JFS) and

On 10/26/2017 08:01 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote: >>>>> A couple

Hi, I've heard that for Dovecot/Mailir systems there are filesystems that are optimised for the situation of many small files in one folder. Could I possibly have some feedback on what the recommended filesystems are? I've heard of ReiserFS but was wondering what other options there are and how they compare. If I get a good comprehensive response I'll build a wiki summary page

On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote: > A? couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs is now available for CentOS 7 as well. > > On 04/12/2017 12:58 AM, H wrote: >> Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your repository? >> >> >> On 3/13/2017 1:09 PM, Nux!

On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote: >> > A couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs >is >> now available for CentOS 7 as well. >> > >> >> Did not have a need to

I have a network server running FC5, with a hardware raid 3 card using 5 drives, as one large (1.2TB) partition in JFS. I chose JFS because of a recommendation for performance from a MythTV tutorial, but I don't really know much about file systems and am suspecting JFS to be causing my problems. I run samba, apache and MythTV on this machine, and there is essentially only one problem as far

Now that I've been enlightened to the terrible write performance of ext3 on my new 3Ware RAID 5 array, I'm stuck choosing an alternative filesystem. I benchmarked XFS, JFS, ReiserFS and ext3 and they came back in that order from best to worst performer. I'm leaning towards XFS because of performance and because centosplus makes kernel modules available for the stock kernel.

On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. >> >> Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?

Hi folks... trying to pick between jfs and xfs for a filesystem. In the past we've used jfs with CentOS + centosplus, however, an older post indicated that this may not be the best choice as the version of jfs included with the centosplus kernel would only be as new as the version that was included in the 2.6.18 kernel as RH doesn't backport fixes... It looks like xfs isn't part of

Dear Listmembers, I try to work with samba (newest rpm for SuSE, 3.0.1.pre2, but that does not matter, the effect was there in 2.2.7 and 2.2.8a too) on an sufficient armed system (the system does not matter either, I have tried it on different machines) using ReiserFS (version 3.6.4-12). When accessing one share from one machine (i.e. copying two or more files at a time to or from the share)

I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?

On 09/25/2020 05:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>>> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the

H wrote: > A couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs is now > available for CentOS 7 as well. > > On 04/12/2017 12:58 AM, H wrote: >> Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the >> same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your >> repository? >> I don't know about this - at home, I'm