similar to: veto dotfiles but not directory?

I''ve got a serious mess of NAT on our firewall/router systems at the corporate office which seems to do nothing other than confuse the heck out of people. What I''d like to do is gradually migrate the hosts on the various DMZ networks away from private IP addresses and NAT over to public IP addresses and proxyarp. What I''m wondering, before I start this, is how do I

I''ve got a rather complex beast of a network that I''ve beeing trying to get properly routed for some time now. I''ve come really close, in that inbound traffic gets where it''s supposed to, and outbound traffic goes where it''s supposed to, but outbound packets are all apparently going over the wrong link. The system is currently configured as a

I''m being cast headlong into unfamiliar waters here, and being desperate for some air, thought I''d come here for some help. :) Anyway, my employer is going through some whiplash-inducing growth spurts, and as a result, the simple "Internet T-1 -> Linux Firewall/NAT -> LAN" setup just isn''t going to cut it anymore. First, we''re bringing in 2

Just started with Samba a few weeks ago so am still a newbie. Am serving a single W-95 client reasonably well - it allows users to log on using their unix id and passwd, and they can all browse their unix home directories. However .... I can't seem to get the "hide dotfiles" directive to work. Nor the "hide files"! Also, If a user on W-95 saves a file to unix called,

Hello there I''m just testing a module (see merging directories) and it is quite involved, in that it: __generic__ 1) creates a user 2) creates a base directory 3) copies generic files (directory with recursion) 4) generate a configuration file from a template 5) creates a symlink __os specific__ 6) copies os specific files (in my scenario two folders, and an init script) 7)

Hi, I've some dot-files in the Maildir/ folder. These files appear in the Mailbox listing, but of course they can't be accessed. In the previous dovecot versions these files were hidden. Matthias

I have "hide dot files" on, but I have noticed that while files with a single dot are hidden, files with multiple dots are not: ".foo" - hidden "...foo" - not hidden Is this by design? *nix certainly hide such files by default... -- Barry -- http://barrkel.blogspot.com/

Hello.. I'm attempting to copy/sync a development directory on my laptop to our web server, and for some reason dot-files are being copied but not deleted. Command line: rsync -rvva --delete-after -e ssh ./ server.com:/var/www/html/project/ The symptom is that I've got files like '.Makefile.swp' and '.hidden.php.swp' on the server (vi temp files) even after deleting them

Am I assuming correctly that you are not, in fact, running anything but imap process from Dovecot? Aki > On 31 December 2018 at 18:35 Chris BL <cpblpublic+dovecot at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Aki, > > Oops; I did not think carefully enough about your instructions. Here is the output from > > $ dovecot -n -c /home/meuser/dotfiles/auto-stanford-dovecot.conf

Hi Aki, (This message might not make it to the list; I have to switch back to the other dovecot to be able to send from that address) Oops; I did not think carefully enough about your instructions. Here is the output from $ dovecot -n -c /home/meuser/dotfiles/auto-stanford-dovecot.conf # 2.3.2.1 (0719df592): /home/meuser/dotfiles/auto-stanford-dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.2 () # OS:

If your client directly executes imap binary, it is not mandatory for dovecot to be running, but you need to put the service section into /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and restart the dovecot service. Putting it to your local config file does not affect the global service. Aki > On 31 December 2018 at 22:16 Chris BL <cpblpublic+dovecot at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Aki,

We are working on fixing this. Aki > On 31 December 2018 at 23:45 Chris BL <cpblpublic+dovecot at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Aki, > > Bingo! Putting that line in dovecot.conf rather than my custom file, and > then using my old custom file, unchanged, from Alpine works perfectly. > > My only remaining question, then, would be ... what was this (change) >

I looked through the wiki and the archives, but couldn't find an answer to this question. We use a webmail product that uses three dummy mbox dotfiles for storing configuration and temporary info. I'm trying to find a way to have dovecot's indexing ignore all dotfiles, and so far have had no luck (other than, of course, coding it in myself). Does anyone know if this is possible?

Hello, If one passes the -p option for a non-standard port to ssh-keyscan when using the -f option to pull hosts from a file, it results in a known_hosts entry that is incorrect: micah at muck$ cat /tmp/try 199.254.238.47 micah.riseup.net,199.254.238.47 ssh-keyscan -t rsa -p 4422 -f /tmp/try > /tmp/known micah at muck$ cat /tmp/known [micah.riseup.net,199.254.238.47]:4422 ssh-rsa

Hi Aki, Oops; I did not think carefully enough about your instructions. Here is the output from $ dovecot -n -c /home/meuser/dotfiles/auto-stanford-dovecot.conf # 2.3.2.1 (0719df592): /home/meuser/dotfiles/auto-stanford-dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.2 () # OS: Linux 4.18.0-13-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 18.10 ext4 # Hostname: cpbl-t450s doveconf: Warning: please set

Op 31/12/2018 om 16:53 schreef Chris Barrington-Leigh: > I then followed the instructions in the Warning lines above and now I > get: > > ?dovecot -n -c /home/meuser/dotfiles/auto-stanford-dovecot.conf > # 2.3.2.1 (0719df592): /home/meuser/dotfiles/auto-stanford-dovecot.conf > # Pigeonhole version 0.5.2 () > # OS: Linux 4.18.0-13-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 18.10 ext4 > #

Hello Stephan, I'm interested to see this get fixed (and ideally one day for it to be really easy for people to set up Alpine so that it competes fairly with heavier GUIs!), but I do not know that I am qualified to help (beyond light testing). Is there someone from Alpine on this thread? The second (askubuntu.com) link you give is my own question (and answer, based on Aki Tuomi's

Hi Aki, I am not 100% sure. I do not really know what my OS does. "ps -A" says dovecot is running, but if I say "sudo service dovecot stop", my email client works fine still (that is, assuming the old version of dovecot is installed). ie the on-demand instances of dovecot-imapd that Alpine calls are, I assume, started and stopped by Alpine. (?) Is my OS using dovecot

Hi Aki, Bingo! Putting that line in dovecot.conf rather than my custom file, and then using my old custom file, unchanged, from Alpine works perfectly. My only remaining question, then, would be ... what was this (change) about / or is there any documentation that I should/could have read to know what to do without asking a lead developer? Thank you very much. I hope you had a great start

Hi, While puppet creates its own directories for internal stuff (puppetca, state, etc.), there''s a fair bit of latitude given to where things like manifests and uploaded files live. I didn''t get much guidance from the docs when I first set things up so I mostly poked at things until the worked. Take a look at the following and let me know if this looks reasonable; if so, it