similar to: (no subject)

I'm very sorry about posting HTML. I know better then that and should have double checked my defaults. I'm reposting this hoping someone Is there a known bug that samba has on older machines in low memory environments? I have set up a 486 with 24Mb of memory with RedHat 7.1. I set it up to run dhcpd, xinetd, and samba. Samba was not run through xinetd. The samba server had a tendency

I am having the exact same problems with my linux box. I have a 486, 24Mb of ram, and a RAID 1 partition. The box runs dhcp, xinetd, telnetd, and samba. It currently only serves the RAID 1 partition via samba to a single Win98 box. Under any large file transfer to the linux box, regardless of which machine initiates the x-fer, the linux box kernel panics and dies. Currently, I have tried

I have been having problems trying to get my samba mounted windows (XP) shares to mount at boot time on my Redhat 8 machine. I have tried changing the start order of things, but it didn't seem to help. Here is the interesting bits from the boot.log Feb 1 11:17:46 vortex-550 network: Setting network parameters: succeeded Feb 1 11:17:46 vortex-550 network: Bringing up loopback interface:

I'm forwarding this as instructed ;) ----- Forwarded message from Markus Friedl <Markus.Friedl at informatik.uni-erlangen.de> ----- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:56:20 +0100 From: Markus Friedl <Markus.Friedl at informatik.uni-erlangen.de> To: tatjana.svizensky at arcs.ac.at Subject: Re: ssh question re: scp In-Reply-To: <20010208145142.G18379 at inuyasha.arcs.ac.at>; from

Hi, I've encountered a strange issue, difficult to reproduce for now. I'm searching from where it comes. Here are some facts: - all programs are compiled from sources using gcc 2.95.3/glibc2.2.x and run on a i686 LFS linux system. - rsync doesn't run above ssl. - using rsync 2.5.4 as server to backup mailboxes on another computer. rsync daemon is launched from xinetd, rsync

I've been doing some testing between Windows 2000 Pro (SP4) and Windows 2000 Server (no SP and SP4) -- specifcally testing file transfers from a Samba 2.2.8a server. Samba server: P4/2.2GHz, ServerWorks chipset, SCSI UW2 disk subsystem (Bonnie++ tested to 35MB/sec), 3Com (acenic) gigabit ethernet Win2kPro: P3/700, 3Com Vortex 100mbit network card Win2kServer: P3/800, 3Com Vortex 100mbit

Hi, In my experiments, I need to disable several linking optimizations. However, bzip2, vortex and eon failed if "-disable-opt" was passed to gccld. I tried the out-of-box llvm and the building process provided by llvm-test. The same problem was observed, when I specified EXTRA_LINKTIME_OPT_FLAGS = -disable-opt on Makefile.program and simplied typed "make" under

Thanks David. Unfortunately many of us cannot use GPL v3 gcc so it's hard for us to investigate this. One question, can you tell if gcc is inlining significantly more than llvm? We have reports that this is one of the issue plaguing eon performance. There are also some relatively well known spec optimizations that we haven't implemented. e.g.

Hi, I have looked at the LLVM code generation quality using small test cases and in general it is better than I thought and in some cases better than gcc. However, there are still some gap in SPEC performance. I have not looked at the root cause of those gaps. Anyone who cares about LLVM performance need to take this seriously. For fair comparison, I used -fno-strict-aliasing in gcc to turn off

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 496359 secuirity Unknown tag/s: secuirity. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore. Bug#496359: The possibility of attack with the help

Friday I enabled the inlinehint function attribute in the inliner. It mostly affects the performance of -Os compiled code. I have made some measurements on the SPEC test suite to show what it means. I made three runs of then nightly tests. The baseline represents -Os with no inlinehint: make TEST=nightly OPTFLAGS=-Os EXTRA_LOPT_OPTIONS=-inlinehint-threshold=0

Subject of Hint: How to create a Bootable Live CD/DVD from your Linux From Scratch (LFS) build Good day from Singapore, I am Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming, based in Singapore. I have recently *successfully* created my own custom Linux distribution called Teo En Ming Linux 2020.03 (FINAL), which is based on Linux From Scratch 20200302-systemd book and Linux Kernel 5.5.7, on 12 March

Samba Version: 3.0.0 Linux Version: Redhat 8 Kernel: 2.4.18-19.8.0smp Kerberos: Mit 1.3.1 Windows Version: 2003 running in mixed mode (though we will be switching to native mode soon) The system was initially set up to hit the NT4 Domain and was authenticating to the domain. The NT 4 domain was upgraded to 2003 running in mixed mode. The Samba server could still authenticate to the domain with

Attached smb.conf now inline: [global] security = ADS workgroup = MUC realm = europe.bmw.corp netbios name = eda netbios aliases = lpeda1 lpeda1.muc log file = /lfs/EDA/DATA/SOFTWARE/samba/var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 2 # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts # and groups on a domain member. The default (*)

hey folks, rsync is a great tool! i use it mostly to sync up Documents between several machines. i use it like this: rsync --progress -vrae ssh /home/bill/Graphics/ bill@vortex:/home/rmckown/Graphics/ the problem i have, is i want to specifiy a specific ssh port other than 22. i want to connect to a specific ssh server behind the firewall on the remote end. it would be nice to use the

Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> writes: > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: > >> On 08/29/2013 04:14 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> >>> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 08/22/2013 10:20 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >>>> >>>>> Now that Syslinux has ls.c32 and

Howdy: This is (at least slightly) off-topic, but I've seen more knowledgeable folks than I mention autonegotiation in this venue and, since I didn't get any response on the vortex-bugs mailing list, I thought I'd ask here (also, the interface in question supports samba so...). And there should be some good news for some folks too. If this is old news, sorry (I've been too busy

Perhaps you noticed that LLVM gained a new optimizing register allocator yesterday (r130568). Linear scan is going away, and RAGreedy is the new default for optimizing builds. Hopefully, you noticed because your binaries were suddenly 2% smaller and 10% faster*. Some noticed because LLVM started crashing or miscompiling their code. Greedy replaces a fairly big chunk of the code generator, so

I just submitted a PR for this (haven't even gotten the confirmation email), but since not everyone tracks the GNATS CVS distribution, I figured that I'd send it here as well. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: Steve Grubb <linux_4ever@yahoo.com> > To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com > Subject: Xinetd 2.3.10 Memory Leaks > Date: 18 Apr 2003 16:18:36 +0000 > > >

Hello everyone, I am having difficulties in setting up a tftp server on a Fedora 3.14.8-200.fc20.x86_64. Running tftp client to test the server functionality, a simple get from the terminal prompts 'Transfer timed out.' back. The version is tftp-hpa 5.2, with remap, with tcpwrappers, unfortunately I am not able to find any log in the system journal.? The server and related services appear