similar to: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3

XFS is the best filesystem. David Weinehall wrote: >On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:33:13PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote: > > >>On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 09:34, Peter Nelson wrote: >> >> >>>Hans Reiser wrote: >>> >>>I'm confused as to why performing a benchmark out of cache as opposed to >>>on disk would hurt performance? >>>

Hi, I`ve find about BtrFS just this week, so I`ve not tested it so far. I`ll do it as soon as I got a spare disk to experiment with. But, I`ve two questions regarding BtrFS. First, do you plan inclusion of BtrFS into mainline kernel and if so, when do you expect this to happen? Second, I would like to see some more benchmarks of BtrFS, so far you provided comparison to Ext3 and XFS, which is

Peter Nelson wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > > >Are you sure your benchmark is large enough to not fit into memory, > >particularly the first stages of it? It looks like not. reiser4 is > >much faster on tasks like untarring enough files to not fit into ram, > >but (despite your words) your results seem to show us as slower unless > >I misread them.... >

I don't think that XFS is a desktop filesystem at all. This is from XFS FAQ: qoute ------------ Q: Why do I see binary NULLS in some files after recovery when I unplugged the power? If it hurts don't do that! * NOTE: XFS 1.1 and kernels => 2.4.18 has the asynchronous delete path which means that you will see a lot less of these problems. If you still have not updated to the 1.1

Please be patient with my ignorance if what I am asking is meaningless in any way. I am not too technically knowledgeable about filesystem internals but I am willing to learn. (I thought of posting to linux-ext4 but did not want to intrude within the technical threads with my layman thread.) From Wikipedia > ReiserFS article > Design section: [quote]ext2 and other Berkeley FFS-like

A few months ago we bought a GIS software. It is running under Windows XP Pro. This software has stored its databases in dbf files, located on one samba share. Executables reside on each WinXP Pro client. The software simply uses dbf databases located on samba share. Each session of the gis opens about 500 files. I have four workstations that are allowed to run this software. [kirchner]

Hi, As I use btrfs as root FS, I wanted fstype to be able to recognize it. The following patch add support for this FS. Regards, benjamin Signed-off-by: Benjamin Cama <benoar at free.fr> --- diff --git a/usr/kinit/fstype/btrfs_fs.h b/usr/kinit/fstype/btrfs_fs.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e1f933e --- /dev/null +++ b/usr/kinit/fstype/btrfs_fs.h @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +#ifndef

Hi, no mailing list for powerpcspe? What?s the progress of your architectures? I don?t see much happening on debian-ports.org, and taking your architectures off that infrastructure hurts others (I?ve ?revived? m68k and kept it running on d-p.o which helps a bit). Anyway: a new klibc (2.0~rc5-1) has been uploaded, and an mksh companion version (40.9.20120518-1) depending on it and trying to use

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 [cc'ing 4 mailing lists, please reply to *one* list only!] hi, every now and then i'm running some benchmarks on filesystems i really use...here are the results: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/bonnie.html http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/ may it be of some help.... thanks, Christian. PS:

"IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR-R" wrote: > In terms of enterprise reliability, I understand, however, having an > "office recommended journaling filesystem", Some journaling filesystems can be _worse_ than non-journaled. If the recovery mechanism of the JFS is to "aggressively" go to the journal, journal mis-reads can _toast_ a filesystem. I'll take a full

Hi All. What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained in CentOS/Linux kernel in the future? Best regards, Rafal.

hello hpa, please pull git pull git://brane.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/klibc.git maks for those changes: Kyle McMartin (1): klibc-utils: add dmesg maximilian attems (2): klibc comment fix fstype: add ocfs2 support with the following diffstat README | 2 usr/Kbuild | 2 usr/kinit/fstype/fstype.c | 15 +++++++

hello hpa, rebased my branch, please pull latest git pull git://brane.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/klibc.git maks for the following shortlog maximilian attems (6): fstype: add squashfs v3 support reiser4_fs.h: add attribute packed to reiser4_master_sb fstype: add ext4 support .gitignore: add subdir specific entries usr/klibc/Kbuild: beautify klibc build fstype:

Hi guys, I''ve seen this post regarding "lvm resize" and this contains all the information I need to resize a disk inside domU : http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-11/msg00019.html >From this post: "With this I can extend the LVs in the Dom0, and either shutdown the DomU and resize2fs from Dom0 or even (tested on test VMs and low-use

Hi, I've been running dovecot-0.99.10 for the past several years, with virtually no problems. Lately, I noticed that the filesystem holding my users' imap maildirs was getting close to full. So... last night, I used tar to copy /var/spool/imap to a new drive (9G scsi, reiserfs) that I then mounted under /var/spool/imap (after moving the old dir aside). After the move, what would take

$ c++ --version c++ (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 On 20.06.2016 21:55, Kevin Duraj wrote: > Emmanuel, > Which version of C++ compiler are you using? > > $ c++ --version > c++ (GCC) 4.9.3 > Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > -Kevin > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart <kelson at kiwix.org > <mailto:kelson

Emmanuel, Which version of C++ compiler are you using? $ c++ --version c++ (GCC) 4.9.3 Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -Kevin On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart <kelson at kiwix.org> wrote: > Hi > > Compilation of 1.3.7 dies with the following configuration: > > ==================================== > ./configure --enable-shared

FYI, looks like more people need to let SonicBLUE know that OGG support is an important factor in there purchasing decisions. Dax ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Paul Crossley <pcross@sonicblue.com> To: 'Dax Kelson' <dax@gurulabs.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 08:21:31 -0800 Subject: RE: OGG support in Rio Riot? Hi Dax, We have no current plans to support OGG,

Hi! I was just wondering how Ext3 and Reiserfs compare. When I reinstalled my server (because of a stupid hacker) I took the opportunity to change to ReiserFS. And I have to say it's really much faster than Ext3. I don't have benchmarks, but for example, stuff like "make dep" on the linux kernel is much faster (even though I had enabled write cache when I was using ext3). So

Hello, I''m quite interested in ZFS, like everybody else I suppose, and am about to install FBSD with ZFS. On that note, i have a different first question to start with. I personally am a Linux fanboy, and would love to see/use ZFS on linux. I assume that I can use those ZFS disks later with any os that can work/recognizes ZFS correct? e.g. I can install/setup ZFS in FBSD, and later use