similar to: Ext3 problems (aborting journal).

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Ext3 problems (aborting journal)."

2004 Jun 24
0
help:about ext3
every one,I meet a problem: I used reahat9.0(kernel 2.4.20-8smp,I installed a SCSI RAID Card),and there are always some problems and them the system is dead. is anyone can help me about it? Thanks Crist Below is the error log: Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,18)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1382828372, count = 1 Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1
2001 Oct 16
0
2.2.19 hang
This is a 2.2.19 machine with ext3-0.0.7a and quota support running. The symptoms are a particular NFS export hangs (for linux clients but not Solaris clients?) the local filesystem gives the following: EXT3-fs warning (device sd(8,49)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 2213 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,49)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1563120916,
2003 Jan 21
1
ext3 is still locking up
A brand new system setup with RH 7.3 is still Oopsing after every X hours. The problem started after about 1 week without errors. Sometimes everything is locked, sometimes still messages are written to /var/log/messages. Sometimes other processes keep running (can still ping the machine) I upgraded the kernel to 2.4.18-19.7.x, changed the memory, but still got problems. When I read all sort of
2001 Oct 14
1
possible ext3 bug?
hiya! i'm currently running 2.4.12-ac1 w/o any further ext3 patches. i've got a dir with some fairly big files (like 15mb/file) in it and while sfv-checking these i got the following errors: Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde attempt to access beyond end of device Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde 16:42: rw=0, want=600889688, limit=12289725 Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde attempt to
2004 Apr 23
1
2.6.5 and latest Fedora Core 1 kernels cannot handle files over 2.x GB?
A mysql database file was copied over to a new box running Fedora Core 1. The kernel was updated to the latest Fedora release. However mysqld complains about corrupted tables. The kernel was then updated to 2.6.5 mysqld still complains about corrupted tables. Hardware: Dual PIII 800. 3ware RAID dmesg: ... ... ... EXT3-fs error (device sdb1): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in
2002 Dec 05
1
ext3 Problem in 2.4.20-ac1?
Since I ain't got a better place to report this, I do it here: Kernel 2.4.20-ac1 # uptime 16:31:00 up 2 days, 22:10, 7 users, load average: 1.89, 2.20, 2.99 This is our main mailbox server. We're running ext3: # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 /dev/sdb5 /boot ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/sda6 /home ext3 rw,noatime,nosuid 0 0 /dev/sdb8 /tmp
2002 Dec 14
2
Nasty ext3 errors 2.4.18
Hi I've got serious troubles - I posted a while back about experiencing ext3 errors using 2.4.18, at the time I put the problems down to harddisk failure, but these problems are occurring more and more - not all of our systems are having this problem but 3 systems have now shown this problem. The hardware is essentially the same, the only difference is disk manufacturers but we've now
2005 Feb 16
0
mke2fs options for very large filesystems (and corruption!)
[sorry if this isn't threaded right... I just subscribed] Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > There are two reasons for the reserve. One is to reserve space on the > partition containing /var and /etc for log files, etc. The other is > to avoid the performance degredation when the last 5-10% of the disk > space is used. (BSD actually reserves 10% by default.) Given that > the
2003 Sep 18
3
Freeing blocks not in datazone
These came up on dmesg this morning: attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1635237736, limit=976791680 attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1635237736, limit=976791680 EXT3-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 4293394431, count = 1 attempt to access beyond end of device 09:00: rw=0, want=1930439616,
2002 Aug 13
0
[EXT3-fs error with RH7.2 and RH7.3]
Hi ! My system is RH7.2 with Adaptec/DPT/I2O drivers (http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/dpt/). There is a 2 disk RAID 1 array which had no disk fail. Several partition on it: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 1.9G 435M 1.4G 24% / /dev/sda2 13G 3.2G 9.1G 26% /home none 504M 0 503M 0% /dev/shm At this time, all
2023 Feb 23
1
Restored mail folders conflict with renamed original ones
On 22/2/2023 2:56 ?.?., Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 22/2/2023 2:30 ?.?., Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Can you please try >> >> doveadm exec imap -u username_of_the_user >> 1 LIST "" "*" >> >> and see if it is there? > > Here is the output: > > # doveadm exec imap -u userx > * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID
2003 Mar 22
0
ext3 oops with 2.4.20
Bug report follows. Please CC me if you want me to read the reply, as I'm not subscribed to ext3-users. [1.] One line summary of the problem: Ext3 has just causing filesystem corruption which required fsck to fix. [2.] Full description of the problem/report: I just had my machine lock up with an ext3 oops, preceeded by a bunch of error messages in the logs. On rebooting, after replaying the
2023 Feb 20
1
Restored mail folders conflict with renamed original ones
Hello, We are running Dovecot 2.3.18 (together with Postfix) on CentOS 7. It uses a Maildir structure. We have a user who has organized his mailbox as shows up at the end of this mail. The user had forgotten that he had renamed his "Grants Active \ European" (.Grants Active.European) folder to "Grants Active \ International" (.Grants Active.International), he thought that
2023 Feb 22
1
Restored mail folders conflict with renamed original ones
On 22/2/2023 2:30 ?.?., Aki Tuomi wrote: > Can you please try > > doveadm exec imap -u username_of_the_user > 1 LIST "" "*" > > and see if it is there? Here is the output: # doveadm exec imap -u userx * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND
2008 Aug 07
1
rsync: hlink.c:271: check_prior: Assertion `node->data != ((void *)0)' failed.
BLS #rsync --version rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
2003 Sep 15
0
EXT3 problems
Hello, I'm running a 2.4.20-8smp RH9 kernel and occassionally get the following error reported to syslog Sep 12 07:45:14 nfs0020 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,33)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 2251915074, count = 1 Sep 12 07:45:14 nfs0020 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,33)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 806949550,
2018 Jan 18
0
issues after botched update
Hi, A client has a glusterfs cluster that's behaving weirdly after some issues during upgrade. They upgraded a glusterfs 2+1 cluster (replica with arbiter) from 3.10.9 to 3.12.4 on Centos and now have weird issues and some files maybe being corrupted. They also switched from nfs ganesha that crashed every couple of days to glusterfs subdirectory mounting. Subdirectory mounting was the
2002 Jul 03
3
EXT3-fs error on kernel 2.4.18-pre3
Hi, I just noticed that my file server running 2.4.18-pre3 + IDE patches & NTFS patches has this error message in the logs: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,4)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 33554432, count = 1 This is the only ext3 error I have seen and the uptime is currently over 74 days. The error actually appeared two weeks ago. The timing coincides well with
2009 Apr 27
2
kickstart problems...
Hi, I am creating CentOS install usb keys and, apart from a few problems, it mostly works... 1. OT: My server HP does not seem to want to boot on it if I set the write protection on. 2. Anaconda tries to fetch the ks.cfg too early... It detects sda, then detects the RAID adapter, then re-detects sda with a "waiting for device to settle before scanning". Anaconda tries to access
2002 Nov 26
0
0.99.2 released
Mostly compiling cleanups but also one bugfix when index wasn't exclusively locked while it was being fsck'ed - that doesn't normally happen without crashing/whatever. v0.99.2 2002-11-26 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> + If we have to wait for a lock longer, the client is now notified about it every 30 seconds. - Default settings still pointed to lib directory instead of