similar to: RH7.2&&smbd2.2.1a&&W98/2000&&Connection Problem

>Is there a wins server on your system? No >Is there a DNS server on your system? Yes! it point all machine by names like static52.ourdomaine.com >I don't know why the windows machine can't find your server when all the >linux machines can. Is there is a DNS or wins server, are the windows boxes >set up to use them? No. >I just don't know how to trouble shoot a

Using the Cement hardening data in Anderson (2008) Model Based Inference in the Life Sciences. A Primer on Evidence, and working with the best model which is lm ( y ~ x1 + x2, data = cement ) the AIC value from R is model <- lm ( formula = y ~ x1 + x2 , data = cement ) AIC ( model ) 64.312 which can be converted to AICc by adding the bias

Hi, I've been searching the web for days for an answer to this weird problem. I hope you guys can shed some light on this. A few months ago our office has changed internet provider, and hence we use a different router/DSL-modem: a ZyXEL P-2602H-D1A Ever since the change our nightly rsync from our office server to our external webserver, which runs an rsync daemon, refuses to work... at

Hello all, I''ve been searching through the archives and the internet for a while now, and can''t seem to find anything that helps me out. I hope you don''t my posting this to both xen-users and linux-lvm simultaneously, but i figured it''d help keep the solution in one place... even though it''ll be the same across two places... Anyways: My setup is this:

Le 10/07/2019 ? 08:46, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 09/07/2019 22:49, Yvan Masson wrote: >> Le 09/07/2019 ? 21:16, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 09/07/2019 20:06, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> First, thanks for all people that continuously giving great advice >>>> on this list!

Hello, I'm facing the following issue: We have a common storage space available through 2 linux servers running samba.linux: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) samba: samba-3.0.10-1.4E.12.2 My customer has an exetrnal system accessing the storage through samba. It creates, modify and deletes a lot of files. All access are done through only one linux server (the second is a

I am curious as to why I quite often receive responses to questions on the help before receiving the actual question. For example Mr Graves has responded to Mr Lumley's response to Mr Wegelin yet I ave not received Mr. Lumley's post while I have received the other two. Cheers, Jim [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I've two files server on Solaris 2.8 on which i've samba 2.2.8a fonctionnal I've try samba 3 on one server and now my users from windows NT can't mount there unix home via samba here a copy of smb.conf # Global parameters [global] # Definitions des parametres globaux workgroup = grovsdma netbios name = grovss01 server string = Samba sur %L security = share # Demande a

> That is what I did. But it fails even when mounting manually: > 1. Connect on the desktop using domain user "yvan.masson" (either > graphically / TTY / SSH). Kerberos ticket is properly created. > 2. Running "sudo mount -t cifs //ad.FOO.BAR.LOCAL/Echange /mnt -o > user=yvan.masson,cruid=yvan.masson,sec=krb5" fails with "Required key > not

On 10/03/2020 10:47, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Le 10/03/2020 ? 11:21, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >> On 10/03/2020 10:10, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>> Le 10/03/2020 ? 10:37, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>>> On 10/03/2020 09:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>>> If think I did not properly explain my setup, sorry for that:

Le 10/03/2020 ? 12:22, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/03/2020 10:47, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Le 10/03/2020 ? 11:21, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 10/03/2020 10:10, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> Le 10/03/2020 ? 10:37, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>>>> On 10/03/2020 09:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote:

Le 10/03/2020 ? 11:21, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/03/2020 10:10, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Le 10/03/2020 ? 10:37, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 10/03/2020 09:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> If think I did not properly explain my setup, sorry for that: Samba >>>> here is not sharing anything. It is just used for

Le 10/07/2019 ? 12:33, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/07/2019 10:37, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> >> OK thanks. However I still want to clarify what is wrong with my >> original setup, where "Partage" directory is shared on a standalone >> Samba 4.9.5 server: >> /home/yvan/Partage/ >> ??? Consultation/ >> ??? Echange/ >

I have 12 binary (raster) files https://echange-fichiers.inra.fr/get?k=k3M2jatJyHy65Cs99G4 . I would like to calculate the moving average for the 12 values for each pixel in the 12 files. For a simple vector we can get a moving average by using this : x <- c(1,2,3,NA,NA,4,6,5,6,4,2,5) movingmean <- rollapply(x, 3, FUN = mean, na.rm = T,fill=NA) now

Le 10/07/2019 ? 14:28, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/07/2019 13:16, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> >> >> Le 10/07/2019 ? 12:33, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 10/07/2019 10:37, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> OK thanks. However I still want to clarify what is wrong with my >>>> original setup, where

Hi ! My system is RH7.2 with Adaptec/DPT/I2O drivers (http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/dpt/). There is a 2 disk RAID 1 array which had no disk fail. Several partition on it: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 1.9G 435M 1.4G 24% / /dev/sda2 13G 3.2G 9.1G 26% /home none 504M 0 503M 0% /dev/shm At this time, all

Stephen et al, You may remember me raising the point that the new e2fsprogs (1.25 as I remember) griped about old journals not having all the appropriate fields zeroed. I've just discovered that the RH 7.2 installer produces journals (ie on partitions created as ext3 from within the installer) that flag these warnings with a modified 1.25 e2fsck (the mods being to clear the errors rather

hi all, the system is a red hat 7.2+all_upgrades. when the system is booting, to make the fsck of a ext[2-3] fs get too much time to see if the fs is clean or no. The kernel is 2.4.9-13, but with a linus kernel 2.4.15p-pre6 the system boot ok. any idea? regards,

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-01-07 15:18

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44 ------- Additional Comments From jan.iven at cern.ch 2002-07-05 01:11 ------- Update: I have reported this to the glibc people, who say that they will not modify their mkstemp(). (http://bugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?debug=&database=default&cmd=view+audit-trail&cmd=view&pr=3573) Attached is a patch to configure{ac,in} to