similar to: SAMBA Installation and Configuration

Hello everyone, Thank you nouveau developers as it seems you may almost of a solution to my lack of good graphics options for my aging sun system. I saw here before back in early December of 2011 a most of someone saying that it seemed that the nouveau drivers almost worked with him and is Sun Ultra 10. I am someone who is very fond of my Sun systems, I have two "SunBlade 100"s,

I have a test cluster running HA-NFS that shares both ufs and zfs based file systems. However, the behavior that I am seeing is a little perplexing. The Setup: I have Sun Cluster 3.2 on a pair of SunBlade 1000''s connecting to two T3B partner groups through a QLogic switch. All four bricks of the T3B are configured as RAID-5 with a hot spare. One brick from each pair is mirrored with VxVM

Hi We have installed and configured Samba 2.2.8 on a Solaris (Sparc) 8 server recently. This server is to replace an existing member server in a NT4 domain and will act as a file server. We want to perform as little user maintenance on the Solaris side as possible so that most of the user setup and maintenance for the domain is controlled through a NT4 server using usrmgr and want to use NT

I have upgraded my openssh version from 2.2.0.p1 to 3.0.2p1. 3.0.2 was compile on a sunblade 100 running Solaris 8. Is it possible for my to use my existing DSA key? Thanks, David Higdon UNIX System Administrator (503) 450-4800 (Office) (503) 701-5558 (Cell Phone) higdon.david at cnf.com

I have compiled and installed NUT-2.2.1 on Solaris 10 on my Sunblade 2000 and it seems to work very well, except that the behaviour of 'wall', which upsmon uses to report significant events, may differ on Solaris from other systems. On Sol10, wall writes the message *only* on the console, unless the "-a" switch is used. On a standard JDS (GNOME) system, there isn't normally a

Hi, I'm running kernel 2.6.8-15, lvm2 v2.01.04-5 and acl v2.2.23-1 on a Sunblade 100 (sparc). In a few months we have experienced for several times that an ext3 filesystem is remounted as read-only (this is due to the option "errors=remount-ro" in /etc/fstab). Sometimes there is no error in log files but sometimes we see: kernel: init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (3016) kernel:

Hi all, i compiled Samba 2.2.5 with gcc on a Sunblade with Solaris 2.8. Last month i compiled Samba 2.2.4 on the same machine without problems. The following options i used: ./configure --with-winbind --with-pam --with-quotas I got the following warnings: Linking bin/wbinfo Compiling nsswitch/winbindd.c Compiling nsswitch/winbindd_user.c Compiling nsswitch/winbindd_group.c Compiling

Today I attempted to upgrade to S10_U2 and migrate some mirrored UFS SVM partitions to ZFS. I used Live Upgrade to migrate from U1 to U2 and that went without a hitch on my SunBlade 2000. And the initial conversion of one side of the UFS mirrors to a ZFS pool and subsequent data migration went fine. However, when I attempted to attach the second side mirrors as a mirror of the ZFS pool, all

Is there a card for OpenSolaris 2009.06 SPARC that will do SATA correctly yet? Need it for a super cheapie, low expectations, SunBlade 100 filer, so I think it has to be notched for 5v PCI slot, iirc. I''m OK with slow -- main goals here are power saving (sleep all 4 disks) and 1TB+ space. Oh, and I hate to be an old head, but I don''t want a peecee. They still scare me :)

In R 1.9.0 running under Solaris 2.9 on a SunBlade 100, with "Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C++ 5.3 2001/05/15" as the C++ compiler, I just did > install.packages("e1071") The output includes these lines, which I have wrapped to fit nicely in mail: ** libs cc -I/users/local/lib/R/include -I/usr/local/include -KPIC -xlibmil \ -dalign -xO4 -c cmeans.c -o cmeans.o cc

I'm trying to build NUT 2.2.1 on a SunBlade 2000 running Solaris 10 (Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC) It won't compile. I'm not a programmer, so I'm afraid I don't know why... [huge at anubis ~/Prog/nut/nut-2.2.1]: ./configure --with-user=ups --with-group=nutNetwork UPS Tools version 2.2.1 checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10 checking host system type...

We use some Samba servers running SuSE 7.1 and samba 2.2.1a. These servers are sometimes very slow while delivering data over the network. It is like a short sleep-mode followed by a wake up. We use Win 95, 98 and 98SE Clients. Any ideas? Thanks from germany, Andre Klocke -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

I have R 1.9.0 running under Solaris 2.9 ona SunBlade 100, and am very happy with it. I heard about the stuff at www.rmetrics.org and thought it might be worth looking at. However, what I found there is a bunch of .zip files. The entry page suggests that there is some way to install packages from .zip files in R, but I have searched all the documentation I have and cannot find it. _Is_ there

Thanks Kristof. Sounds like we'll need to investigate though I'd say it is not blocking the switch. At this point I think everybody is on board to flip the switch. @Eric, how does that sound to you? Thanks, Q > Le 1 juin 2017 à 07:46, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com> a écrit : > > >> On 31 May 2017, at 17:07, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at

Hi all, I added a buildbot [1] running the test-suite with -O0 -global-isel. It runs into the same 2 timeouts that I reported previously on this thread (paq8p and scimark2). It would be nice to make it green before flipping the switch. At the moment, it lives in an internal buildmaster that I've setup for this purpose. If we fix it and it proves to be stable for a week or two, I'll move

I'm running R2.0.1 under Solaris 2.9 on a SunBlade 100. When I installed it, I set things up to use the Sun compilers cc, CC, f95 with the options recommended in the installation and administration guide. Until today, no worries. With all this discussion about R GUIs I thought I'd give R Commander a go. The web page said to install a bunch of packages first, so I did >

Does anyone have any log analysis tools? I'm currently configured with "log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m", which makes identifying issues with any one client easy, but doesn't provide me with an overall picture of what has been happening. What I'd like to be able to produce is a report showing, for a given unit time, the total number of clients that have connected,

On 10/25/2017 12:10 PM, Evgeny Astigeevich via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi Chandler, > > I ran the LNT benchmarks and SPEC2k6.train on AArch64 Cortex-A57. I > used revisions: Clang 316561, LLVM 316563. > > Options: -O3 -mcpu=cortex-a57 -fomit-frame-pointer > -fexperimental-new-pass-manager > > Regressions: execution time increase > > LNT > >

On 10/25/2017 12:32 PM, Evgeny Astigeevich wrote: > > Hi Hal, > > I quickly checked the execution profile. It is real. The code changed > significantly. A number of the hottest regions changed. I’ll compare IRs. > Thanks. Obviously a 1000% execution performance regression seems problematic. -Hal > JFYI FreeBench/fourinarow time graph: >

On 12 June 2017 at 18:54, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I added a buildbot [1] running the test-suite with -O0 -global-isel. It > runs into the same 2 timeouts that I reported previously on this thread > (paq8p and scimark2). It would be nice to make it green before flipping the > switch. > > I did some more investigations on a machine