similar to: Oops in 2.6.8.1 at __journal_drop_transaction

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches similar to: "Oops in 2.6.8.1 at __journal_drop_transaction"

2005 Nov 16
0
(large, external) data journal BUG (Assertion failure in __journal_drop_transaction() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:626: "transaction->t_forget == NULL")
Hi, A couple of our important servers, both running FC4 but one i386 and one x86_64, have been crashing recently. They both are running ext3 data=journal with large external journals and high commit intervals. Both machines use the gdth driver for their hardware RAID sets, if that's of any use. I think the hardware is good in both cases. I hope someone finds this data useful enough to be
2007 May 14
0
Assertion failure in __journal_drop_transaction()
Hello all, Last night a server of mine went belly up with my remote log server telling me this log entry: kernel: Assertion failure in __journal_drop_transaction() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:615: "transaction->t_forget == NULL" During this time, we had high email loads and I have my 2 /var/spool/postfix_1 and /var/spool/postfix_2 partitions mounted with "data=journal" option.
2005 May 03
0
several ext3 and mysql kernel crashes
Hi Ext3! I'm running about 30 dedicated MySQL machines under quite decent loads, and they are occassionally crashing. I've been logging console messages recently in an effort to find the cause, and some appear to be related to I perused your lists and found the message I'm replying to. If you don't mind, I've included messages and ksymoops from two crashes that I had
2005 Oct 14
0
how to build Xen for 2.6.8.1?
I''m looking at: http://wiki.blitzed.org/User:grifferz/Xen#Xen_kernel_patch and would like to get a sparse tree for 2.6.8.1 to build both the domU and dom0 for linux kernel 2.6.8.1. Could someone point me in the right direction? thanks, dan _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2004 Jan 24
1
1000''s of classes and filters
Hi, More than 1000''s of classes and filters gets created/deleted in run time. Are we doing it correctly( as our requirement is such). Since few days we are facing lots of problems, like the server gets hanged, we get some junk messages in our logs. we have to reboot our server every now and then. What is the max limit of classes/filters can be created. we are using redhat 7.3.
2004 Nov 01
1
samba 3.0.7 on linux 2.6.8.1 with gigabit = very slow upload speed
Here's the problem in a nutshell: One samba-server (stand alone) A couple of Windows XP (sp2) clients All connected through a gigabit network Transfers between two of the windows computers works just fine and the speed is about 20-30MB/s. Transfers from the server to any windows computer also works fine and has the same speed. Transfers TO the server from any windows computer is horribly
2004 Nov 01
0
samba 3.0.7 on linux 2.6.8.1 with gigabit = very slowupload speed
lower your debug level. High debug level lowers performance... Mit freundlichem Gru?, Dirk Laurenz Systems Engineer Fujitsu Siemens Computers Sales Central Europe Deutschland Professional Service Organisation Nord / Ost Hildesheimer Strasse 25 30880 Laatzen Germany Telephone: +49 (511) 84 89 - 18 08 Telefax: +49 (511) 84 89 - 25 18 08 Mobile: +49 (170) 22 10 781 Email:
2005 Jun 07
0
transaction->t_forget == NULL assertion failure with data=journal
It appears that this bug in data=journal mode, https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2005-February/msg00045.html isn't fixed in 2.6.11.11. Andrew, I've CC'd you since you have previously looked at this specific issue. I'm seeing this problem on dual-Opteron x86-64 boxes serving NFS + Samba3 to a few dozen clients; it takes several hours at high load to reproduce. We
2001 Oct 07
2
"DRQ after issuing write" error
While writing a file to an ext3 filesystem, i get some drive errors on the console. I guess is a drive/ide related problem more that a ext3 one, but anyway the debug output is here if you want to take a look. And, by the way, what means that DRQ thing?? Oct 7 20:31:36 fargo kernel: (journal.c, 218): kjournald: kjournald wakes Oct 7 20:31:36 fargo kernel: (journal.c, 202): kjournald:
2005 Sep 09
7
[PATCH 0/6] jbd cleanup
The following 6 patches cleanup the jbd code and kill about 200 lines. First of 4 patches can apply to 2.6.13-git8 and 2.6.13-mm2. The rest of them can apply to 2.6.13-mm2. fs/jbd/checkpoint.c | 179 +++++++++++-------------------------------- fs/jbd/commit.c | 101 ++++++++++-------------- fs/jbd/journal.c | 11 +- fs/jbd/revoke.c | 158